Literature DB >> 27688055

Proteomic analysis of pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) ripening process provides new evidence for the sugar/acid metabolism difference between core and mesocarp.

Zhen Gao1, Chengjun Zhang1, Meng Luo1, Yusen Wu1, Shuyan Duan1, Jiefa Li1, Lei Wang1, Shiren Song1, Wenping Xu1, Shiping Wang1, Caixi Zhang1, Chao Ma1.   

Abstract

Pears are one of the most popular nutrient-rich fruits in the world. The pear core and mesocarp have significantly different metabolism, although they display similar profiles. Most strikingly, the core is more acidic in taste. Our results showed that there is more titrated acid but lower total soluble solids in the core compared to the mesocarp, and the content of citric acid was more than 17-fold higher in the core compared to the mesocarp at the ripening stage. Proteomics was used to investigate the difference between core and mesocarp tissues during "Cuiguan" pear ripening. Fifty-four different protein expression patterns were identified in the core and mesocarp. In general, common variably expressed proteins between the core and mesocarp were associated with important physiological processes, such as glycolysis, pyruvate metabolic processes, and oxidative stress. Further, protein level associated qRT-PCR verification revealed a higher abundance of fructose-bisphosphate aldolase and NADP-dependent malic enzymes, which may play a role in the low acid content in the mesocarp, whereas a higher abundance of disulfide isomerase-like 2-2 and calcium-dependent lipid-binding in the core may explain why it is less prone to accumulate sugar. The different levels of a few typical ROS scavenger enzymes suggested that oxidative stress is higher in the core than in the mesocarp. This study provides the first characterization of the pear core proteome and a description of its variation compared to the mesocarp during ripening.
© 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Core; Mesocarp; Plant proteomics; qRT-PCR; “Cuiguan” pear

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27688055     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201600108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  5 in total

1.  Analysis of the Fruit Quality of Pear (Pyrus spp.) Using Widely Targeted Metabolomics.

Authors:  Pufan Zheng; Mei Zhang; Xin Fang; Lili Tang; Zhixue Wang; Fuchen Shi
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-05-16

2.  Quantitative proteomic analysis of pear (Pyrus pyrifolia cv. "Hosui") flesh provides novel insights about development and quality characteristics of fruit.

Authors:  Hu Ping Zhang; Ying Su; Qing Yu; Gai Hua Qin
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.116

Review 3.  Modifications in Organic Acid Profiles During Fruit Development and Ripening: Correlation or Causation?

Authors:  Willian Batista-Silva; Vitor L Nascimento; David B Medeiros; Adriano Nunes-Nesi; Dimas M Ribeiro; Agustín Zsögön; Wagner L Araújo
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Packham's Triumph Pears (Pyrus communis L.) Post-Harvest Treatment during Cold Storage Based on Chitosan and Rue Essential Oil.

Authors:  Yeimmy Peralta-Ruiz; Carlos David Grande-Tovar; Diana Paola Navia Porras; Angie Sinning-Mangonez; Johannes Delgado-Ospina; María González-Locarno; Yarley Maza Pautt; Clemencia Chaves-López
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Carbohydrate regulation response to cold during rhizome bud dormancy release in Polygonatum kingianum.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Tao Liu; Changjian Ma; Guoqing Li; Xinhong Wang; Jianghui Wang; Jin Chang; Cong Guan; Huimin Yao; Xuehui Dong
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.215

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.