Literature DB >> 27687175

DNA damage responses and stress resistance: Concepts from bacterial SOS to metazoan immunity.

Ashley B Williams1, Björn Schumacher2.   

Abstract

The critical need for species preservation has driven the evolution of mechanisms that integrate stress signals from both exogenous and endogenous sources. Past research has been largely focused on cell-autonomous stress responses; however, recently their systemic outcomes within an organism and their implications at the ecological and species levels have emerged. Maintenance of species depends on the high fidelity transmission of the genome over infinite generations; thus, many pathways exist to monitor and restore the integrity of the genome and to coordinate DNA repair with other cellular processes, such as cell division and growth. The specifics of these DNA damage responses (DDRs) vary vastly but some general themes are conserved from ancient organisms, such as bacteria and archaea, to humans. Despite decades of research, however, DDRs still have many layers of complexity and some surprises left to be discovered. One of the most interesting current research topics is the link between DNA damage and stress resistance: the outcomes of DDRs can protect the organism from other secondary challenges. At this time, these types of responses are best characterized in bacteria and the simple metazoan model, Caenorhabditis elegans, but it is becoming clear that similar processes also exist in higher organisms.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caenorhabditis elegans; DNA damage response; Escherichia coli; Immunity; SOS response

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27687175      PMCID: PMC5479470          DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2016.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev        ISSN: 0047-6374            Impact factor:   5.432


  65 in total

Review 1.  Ultraviolet mutagenesis and inducible DNA repair in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  E M Witkin
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1976-12

2.  DNA topoisomerase targets of the fluoroquinolones: a strategy for avoiding bacterial resistance.

Authors:  X Zhao; C Xu; J Domagala; K Drlica
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  An essential role for XBP-1 in host protection against immune activation in C. elegans.

Authors:  Claire E Richardson; Tristan Kooistra; Dennis H Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Aeons of distress: an evolutionary perspective on the bacterial SOS response.

Authors:  Ivan Erill; Susana Campoy; Jordi Barbé
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 16.408

5.  RPN-6 determines C. elegans longevity under proteotoxic stress conditions.

Authors:  David Vilchez; Ianessa Morantte; Zheng Liu; Peter M Douglas; Carsten Merkwirth; Ana P C Rodrigues; Gerard Manning; Andrew Dillin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The TFEB orthologue HLH-30 regulates autophagy and modulates longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Louis R Lapierre; C Daniel De Magalhaes Filho; Philip R McQuary; Chu-Chiao Chu; Orane Visvikis; Jessica T Chang; Sara Gelino; Binnan Ong; Andrew E Davis; Javier E Irazoqui; Andrew Dillin; Malene Hansen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 7.  Insights from the worm: the C. elegans model for innate immunity.

Authors:  Maria A Ermolaeva; Björn Schumacher
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 11.130

8.  Ce-Duox1/BLI-3 generated reactive oxygen species trigger protective SKN-1 activity via p38 MAPK signaling during infection in C. elegans.

Authors:  Ransome van der Hoeven; Katie C McCallum; Melissa R Cruz; Danielle A Garsin
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  Germline signals deploy NHR-49 to modulate fatty-acid β-oxidation and desaturation in somatic tissues of C. elegans.

Authors:  Ramesh Ratnappan; Francis R G Amrit; Shaw-Wen Chen; Hasreet Gill; Kyle Holden; Jordan Ward; Keith R Yamamoto; Carissa P Olsen; Arjumand Ghazi
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  The SOS response increases bacterial fitness, but not evolvability, under a sublethal dose of antibiotic.

Authors:  Clara Torres-Barceló; Mila Kojadinovic; Richard Moxon; R Craig MacLean
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  7 in total

1.  Editorial: DNA damage & immunity.

Authors:  George A Garinis; Bjoern Schwer; Björn Schumacher
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 5.432

Review 2.  Stem Cell DNA Damage and Genome Mutation in the Context of Aging and Cancer Initiation.

Authors:  Lara Al Zouabi; Allison J Bardin
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 9.708

3.  Increasing genomic instability during cancer therapy in a patient with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Authors:  Nadine Schuler; Jan Palm; Sabine Schmitz; Yvonne Lorat; Claudia E Rübe
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-11-02

Review 4.  The SOS system: A complex and tightly regulated response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Katarzyna H Maslowska; Karolina Makiela-Dzbenska; Iwona J Fijalkowska
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  Expression of different ParE toxins results in conserved phenotypes with distinguishable classes of toxicity.

Authors:  Jessica R Ames; Meenakumari Muthuramalingam; Tamiko Murphy; Fares Z Najar; Christina R Bourne
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Self-DNA Exposure Induces Developmental Defects and Germline DNA Damage Response in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Marcello Germoglio; Adele Adamo; Guido Incerti; Fabrizio Cartenì; Silvia Gigliotti; Aurora Storlazzi; Stefano Mazzoleni
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-08

Review 7.  Drugging the Cancers Addicted to DNA Repair.

Authors:  Jac A Nickoloff; Dennie Jones; Suk-Hee Lee; Elizabeth A Williamson; Robert Hromas
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 11.816

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.