J Cebral1, E Ollikainen2, B J Chung1, F Mut1, V Sippola2, B R Jahromi2, R Tulamo2,3, J Hernesniemi2, M Niemelä2, A Robertson4, J Frösen5,6. 1. From the Bioengineering Department (J.C., B.J.C., F.M.), Volgenau School of Engineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia. 2. Neurosurgery Research Group (E.O., V.S., B.R.J., R.T., J.H., M.N., J.F.), Biomedicum Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. 3. Department of Vascular Surgery (R.T.), Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. 4. Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Department of Bioengineering (A.R.), Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. Neurosurgery Research Group (E.O., V.S., B.R.J., R.T., J.H., M.N., J.F.), Biomedicum Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland juhana.frosen@kuh.fi. 6. Department of Neurosurgery and Hemorrhagic Brain Pathology Research Group (J.F.), Neurocenter, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Saccular intracranial aneurysm is a common disease that may cause devastating intracranial hemorrhage. Hemodynamics, wall remodeling, and wall inflammation have been associated with saccular intracranial aneurysm rupture. We investigated how saccular intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics is associated with wall remodeling and inflammation of the saccular intracranial aneurysm wall. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tissue samples resected during a saccular intracranial aneurysm operation (11 unruptured, 9 ruptured) were studied with histology and immunohistochemistry. Patient-specific computational models of hemodynamics were created from preoperative CT angiographies. RESULTS: More stable and less complex flows were associated with thick, hyperplastic saccular intracranial aneurysm walls, while slower flows with more diffuse inflow were associated with degenerated and decellularized saccular intracranial aneurysm walls. Wall degeneration (P = .041) and rupture were associated with increased inflammation (CD45+, P = .031). High wall shear stress (P = .018), higher vorticity (P = .046), higher viscous dissipation (P = .046), and high shear rate (P = .046) were associated with increased inflammation. Inflammation was also associated with lack of an intact endothelium (P = .034) and the presence of organized luminal thrombosis (P = .018), though overall organized thrombosis was associated with low minimum wall shear stress (P = .034) and not with the flow conditions associated with inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Flow conditions in the saccular intracranial aneurysm are associated with wall remodeling. Inflammation, which is associated with degenerative wall remodeling and rupture, is related to high flow activity, including elevated wall shear stress. Endothelial injury may be a mechanism by which flow induces inflammation in the saccular intracranial aneurysm wall. Hemodynamic simulations might prove useful in identifying saccular intracranial aneurysms at risk of developing inflammation, a potential biomarker for rupture.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Saccular intracranial aneurysm is a common disease that may cause devastating intracranial hemorrhage. Hemodynamics, wall remodeling, and wall inflammation have been associated with saccular intracranial aneurysm rupture. We investigated how saccular intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics is associated with wall remodeling and inflammation of the saccular intracranial aneurysm wall. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tissue samples resected during a saccular intracranial aneurysm operation (11 unruptured, 9 ruptured) were studied with histology and immunohistochemistry. Patient-specific computational models of hemodynamics were created from preoperative CT angiographies. RESULTS: More stable and less complex flows were associated with thick, hyperplastic saccular intracranial aneurysm walls, while slower flows with more diffuse inflow were associated with degenerated and decellularized saccular intracranial aneurysm walls. Wall degeneration (P = .041) and rupture were associated with increased inflammation (CD45+, P = .031). High wall shear stress (P = .018), higher vorticity (P = .046), higher viscous dissipation (P = .046), and high shear rate (P = .046) were associated with increased inflammation. Inflammation was also associated with lack of an intact endothelium (P = .034) and the presence of organized luminal thrombosis (P = .018), though overall organized thrombosis was associated with low minimum wall shear stress (P = .034) and not with the flow conditions associated with inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Flow conditions in the saccular intracranial aneurysm are associated with wall remodeling. Inflammation, which is associated with degenerative wall remodeling and rupture, is related to high flow activity, including elevated wall shear stress. Endothelial injury may be a mechanism by which flow induces inflammation in the saccular intracranial aneurysm wall. Hemodynamic simulations might prove useful in identifying saccular intracranial aneurysms at risk of developing inflammation, a potential biomarker for rupture.
Authors: Juan R Cebral; Xinjie Duan; Piyusha S Gade; Bong Jae Chung; Fernando Mut; Khaled Aziz; Anne M Robertson Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Juan R Cebral; Marcelo A Castro; Sunil Appanaboyina; Christopher M Putman; Daniel Millan; Alejandro F Frangi Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Juhana Frösen; Anna Piippo; Anders Paetau; Marko Kangasniemi; Mika Niemelä; Juha Hernesniemi; Juha Jääskeläinen Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-08-19 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: David Hasan; Nohra Chalouhi; Pascal Jabbour; Aaron S Dumont; David K Kung; Vincent A Magnotta; William L Young; Tomoki Hashimoto; H Richard Winn; Donald Heistad Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Rafael Medero; Katrina Ruedinger; David Rutkowski; Kevin Johnson; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: J R Cebral; F Detmer; B J Chung; J Choque-Velasquez; B Rezai; H Lehto; R Tulamo; J Hernesniemi; M Niemela; A Yu; R Williamson; K Aziz; S Shakur; S Amin-Hanjani; F Charbel; Y Tobe; A Robertson; J Frösen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Paolo Machi; Rafik Ouared; Olivier Brina; Pierre Bouillot; Hasan Yilmaz; Maria I Vargas; Renato Gondar; Philippe Bijlenga; Karl O Lovblad; Zsolt Kulcsár Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: B J Chung; R Doddasomayajula; F Mut; F Detmer; M B Pritz; F Hamzei-Sichani; W Brinjikji; D F Kallmes; C M Jimenez; C M Putman; J R Cebral Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Philipp Berg; Samuel Voß; Gábor Janiga; Sylvia Saalfeld; Aslak W Bergersen; Kristian Valen-Sendstad; Jan Bruening; Leonid Goubergrits; Andreas Spuler; Tin Lok Chiu; Anderson Chun On Tsang; Gabriele Copelli; Benjamin Csippa; György Paál; Gábor Závodszky; Felicitas J Detmer; Bong J Chung; Juan R Cebral; Soichiro Fujimura; Hiroyuki Takao; Christof Karmonik; Saba Elias; Nicole M Cancelliere; Mehdi Najafi; David A Steinman; Vitor M Pereira; Senol Piskin; Ender A Finol; Mariya Pravdivtseva; Prasanth Velvaluri; Hamidreza Rajabzadeh-Oghaz; Nikhil Paliwal; Hui Meng; Santhosh Seshadhri; Sreenivas Venguru; Masaaki Shojima; Sergey Sindeev; Sergey Frolov; Yi Qian; Yu-An Wu; Kent D Carlson; David F Kallmes; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Oliver Beuing Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2019-05-03 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: K H Narsinh; K Mueller; J Nelson; J Massachi; D C Murph; A Z Copelan; S W Hetts; V V Halbach; R T Higashida; A A Abla; M R Amans; C F Dowd; H Kim; D L Cooke Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 3.825