Literature DB >> 27686356

Prone position and VAP incidence in the PROSEVA trial: attention to the causal question when interpreting competing risk analysis-response to comments by Ranzani et al.

Muriel Rabilloud1, Claude Guérin2,3.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27686356     DOI： 10.1007/s00134-016-4548-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN： 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Ventilator-associated pneumonia in ARDS patients: the impact of prone positioning. A secondary analysis of the PROSEVA trial.

Authors:  L Ayzac; R Girard; L Baboi; P Beuret; M Rabilloud; J C Richard; C Guérin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  A competing risks analysis should report results on all cause-specific hazards and cumulative incidence functions.

Authors:  Aurelien Latouche; Arthur Allignol; Jan Beyersmann; Myriam Labopin; Jason P Fine
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Prone position and VAP incidence in the PROSEVA trial: attention to the causal question when interpreting competing risk analysis.

Authors:  Otavio T Ranzani; Gianluigi Li Bassi; Antoni Torres
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 17.440
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.