Literature DB >> 27685779

A framework for cumulative risk assessment in the 21st century.

Angelo Moretto1, Ammie Bachman2, Alan Boobis3, Keith R Solomon4, Timothy P Pastoor5, Martin F Wilks6, Michelle R Embry7.   

Abstract

The ILSI Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) has developed a framework to support a transition in the way in which information for chemical risk assessment is obtained and used (RISK21). The approach is based on detailed problem formulation, where exposure drives the data acquisition process in order to enable informed decision-making on human health safety as soon as sufficient evidence is available. Information is evaluated in a transparent and consistent way with the aim of optimizing available resources. In the context of risk assessment, cumulative risk assessment (CRA) poses additional problems and questions that can be addressed using the RISK21 approach. The focus in CRA to date has generally been on chemicals that have common mechanisms of action. Recently, concern has also been expressed about chemicals acting on multiple pathways that lead to a common health outcome, and non-chemical other conditions (non-chemical stressors) that can lead to or modify a common outcome. Acknowledging that CRAs, as described above, are more conceptually, methodologically and computationally complex than traditional single-stressor risk assessments, RISK21 further developed the framework for implementation of workable processes and procedures for conducting assessments of combined effects from exposure to multiple chemicals and non-chemical stressors. As part of the problem formulation process, this evidence-based framework allows the identification of the circumstances in which it is appropriate to conduct a CRA for a group of compounds. A tiered approach is then proposed, where additional chemical stressors and/or non-chemical modulating factors (ModFs) are considered sequentially. Criteria are provided to facilitate the decision on whether or not to include ModFs in the formal quantitative assessment, with the intention to help focus the use of available resources to have the greatest potential to protect public health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical stressors; RISK21; cumulative risk assessment; non-chemical stressors; risk assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27685779     DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2016.1211618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  15 in total

1.  Characterizing Risk for Cumulative Risk Assessments.

Authors:  Margaret M MacDonell; Richard C Hertzberg; Glenn E Rice; J Michael Wright; Linda K Teuschler
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  A Case Study Application of the Aggregate Exposure Pathway (AEP) and Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) Frameworks to Facilitate the Integration of Human Health and Ecological End Points for Cumulative Risk Assessment (CRA).

Authors:  David E Hines; Stephen W Edwards; Rory B Conolly; Annie M Jarabek
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Influence of exposure to pesticide mixtures on the metabolomic profile in post-metamorphic green frogs (Lithobates clamitans).

Authors:  Robin J Van Meter; Donna A Glinski; S Thomas Purucker; W Matthew Henderson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Aggregate Exposure Pathways in Support of Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Yu-Mei Tan; Jeremy A Leonard; Stephen Edwards; Justin Teeguarden; Alicia Paini; Peter Egeghy
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2018-03-29

5.  Independent and joint contributions of economic, social and physical environmental characteristics to mortality in the Detroit Metropolitan Area: A study of cumulative effects and pathways.

Authors:  Amy J Schulz; Amel Omari; Melanie Ward; Graciela B Mentz; Ricardo Demajo; Natalie Sampson; Barbara A Israel; Angela G Reyes; Donele Wilkins
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.078

Review 6.  Assessing health risks from multiple environmental stressors: Moving from G×E to I×E.

Authors:  Cliona M McHale; Gwendolyn Osborne; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Andrew G Salmon; Martha S Sandy; Gina Solomon; Luoping Zhang; Martyn T Smith; Lauren Zeise
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 5.657

Review 7.  Implications of applying cumulative risk assessment to the workplace.

Authors:  Mary A Fox; Kristen Spicer; L Casey Chosewood; Pam Susi; Douglas O Johns; G Scott Dotson
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 9.621

8.  Evolving Science and Practice of Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Katherine von Stackelberg; Pamela R D Williams
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.000

9.  Public and private tapwater: Comparative analysis of contaminant exposure and potential risk, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA.

Authors:  Paul M Bradley; Denis R LeBlanc; Kristin M Romanok; Kelly L Smalling; Michael J Focazio; Mary C Cardon; Jimmy M Clark; Justin M Conley; Nicola Evans; Carrie E Givens; James L Gray; L Earl Gray; Phillip C Hartig; Christopher P Higgins; Michelle L Hladik; Luke R Iwanowicz; Keith A Loftin; R Blaine McCleskey; Carrie A McDonough; Elizabeth K Medlock-Kakaley; Christopher P Weis; Vickie S Wilson
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 13.352

10.  Integration of novel approaches demonstrates simultaneous metabolic inactivation and CAR-mediated hepatocarcinogenesis of a nitrification inhibitor.

Authors:  Jessica L LaRocca; Reza J Rasoulpour; B Bhaskar Gollapudi; David L Eisenbrandt; Lynea A Murphy; Matthew J LeBaron
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2017-10-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.