Literature DB >> 27683362

Male courtship decisions are influenced by light environment and female receptivity.

Gemma L Cole1, John A Endler2.   

Abstract

The appearance of animal colour signals depends jointly upon the ambient light spectrum and the signal's reflectance spectra. Light environment heterogeneity might, therefore, allow individuals to enhance their signal by signalling in an environment that increases signal efficacy. We tested this hypothesis by providing male guppies (Poecilia reticulata), a choice of three light environments in which to display their colour signal to females: green, lilac, and clear. We paired males with both receptive and non-receptive females to test whether female response might affect male behavioural decisions. Males preferred the clear environment in all trials and this environment also resulted in males having the highest average visual contrast. Sexual behaviour was influenced by complex interactions between female receptivity, light environment, and male colour pattern contrast. Males spent significantly more time in the environment in which their colour signal had the highest contrast, but only when paired with receptive females. Significant interactions between light environment and individual male colour components were also seen only in receptive trials. Our results suggest that males use light environment to enhance their colour pattern, but only in the presence of receptive females.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  colour signals; light environment; receptivity; sexual selection; vision; visual contrast

Year:  2016        PMID: 27683362      PMCID: PMC5046890          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  19 in total

1.  Sensory drive in cichlid speciation.

Authors:  Martine E Maan; Kees D Hofker; Jacques J M van Alphen; Ole Seehausen
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Light habitats and the role of polarized iridescence in the sensory ecology of neotropical nymphalid butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae).

Authors:  Jonathan M Douglas; Thomas W Cronin; Tsyr-Huei Chiou; Nathaniel J Dominy
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Animal visual systems and the evolution of color patterns: sensory processing illuminates signal evolution.

Authors:  John A Endler; David A Westcott; Joah R Madden; Tim Robson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Exploring complex fitness surfaces: multiple ornamentation and polymorphism in male guppies.

Authors:  Mark W Blows; Robert Brooks; Peter G Kraft
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Variable environmental effects on a multicomponent sexually selected trait.

Authors:  Gemma L Cole; John A Endler
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Carotenoid modulation of immune function and sexual attractiveness in zebra finches.

Authors:  Jonathan D Blount; Neil B Metcalfe; Tim R Birkhead; Peter F Surai
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Artificial selection for food colour preferences.

Authors:  Gemma L Cole; John A Endler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Male displays adjusted to female's response.

Authors:  Gail L Patricelli; J Albert C Uy; Gregory Walsh; Gerald Borgia
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Genetic and environmental variation in the visual properties of bluefin killifish, Lucania goodei.

Authors:  R C Fuller; K L Carleton; J M Fadool; T C Spady; J Travis
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Lighting environment predicts the relative abundance of male colour morphs in bluefin killifish (Lucania goodei) populations.

Authors:  Rebecca C Fuller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  6 in total

1.  Male courtship decisions are influenced by light environment and female receptivity.

Authors:  Gemma L Cole; John A Endler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evolutionary history limits species' ability to match colour sensitivity to available habitat light.

Authors:  Matthew J Murphy; Erica L Westerman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  The evolution of male mate choice and female ornamentation: a review of mathematical models.

Authors:  Courtney L Fitzpatrick; Maria R Servedio
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.624

4.  Differences in signal contrast and camouflage among different colour variations of a stomatopod crustacean, Neogonodactylus oerstedii.

Authors:  Amanda M Franklin; Justin Marshall; Adina D Feinstein; Michael J Bok; Anya D Byrd; Sara M Lewis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  25 Years of sensory drive: the evidence and its watery bias.

Authors:  Molly E Cummings; John A Endler
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.624

Review 6.  Environmental Correlates of Sexual Signaling in the Heteroptera: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Eleanor H Z Gourevitch; David M Shuker
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.769

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.