Literature DB >> 27682203

Considering sex as a biological variable in preclinical research.

Leah R Miller1, Cheryl Marks2, Jill B Becker3, Patricia D Hurn4, Wei-Jung Chen5, Teresa Woodruff6, Margaret M McCarthy7, Farida Sohrabji5, Londa Schiebinger8, Cora Lee Wetherington9, Susan Makris10, Arthur P Arnold11,12, Gillian Einstein13,14,15, Virginia M Miller16,17, Kathryn Sandberg18,19, Susan Maier20, Terri L Cornelison20, Janine A Clayton20.   

Abstract

In June 2015, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) released a Guide notice (NOT-OD-15-102) that highlighted the expectation of the NIH that the possible role of sex as a biologic variable be factored into research design, analyses, and reporting of vertebrate animal and human studies. Anticipating these guidelines, the NIH Office of Research on Women's Health, in October 2014, convened key stakeholders to discuss methods and techniques for integrating sex as a biologic variable in preclinical research. The workshop focused on practical methods, experimental design, and approaches to statistical analyses in the use of both male and female animals, cells, and tissues in preclinical research. Workshop participants also considered gender as a modifier of biology. This article builds on the workshop and is meant as a guide to preclinical investigators as they consider methods and techniques for inclusion of both sexes in preclinical research and is not intended to prescribe exhaustive/specific approaches for compliance with the new NIH policy.-Miller, L. R., Marks, C., Becker, J. B., Hurn, P. D., Chen, W.-J., Woodruff, T., McCarthy, M. M., Sohrabji, F., Schiebinger, L., Wetherington, C. L., Makris, S., Arnold, A. P., Einstein, G., Miller, V. M., Sandberg, K., Maier, S., Cornelison, T. L., Clayton, J. A. Considering sex as a biological variable in preclinical research. © FASEB.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gender; methods; sex differences; sex influences

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27682203      PMCID: PMC6191005          DOI: 10.1096/fj.201600781R

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FASEB J        ISSN: 0892-6638            Impact factor:   5.191


  18 in total

Review 1.  Estrogen actions in the central nervous system.

Authors:  B S McEwen; S E Alves
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Males still dominate animal studies.

Authors:  Irving Zucker; Annaliese K Beery
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Strategies and methods for research on sex differences in brain and behavior.

Authors:  Jill B Becker; Arthur P Arnold; Karen J Berkley; Jeffrey D Blaustein; Lisa A Eckel; Elizabeth Hampson; James P Herman; Sherry Marts; Wolfgang Sadee; Meir Steiner; Jane Taylor; Elizabeth Young
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.736

4.  The number of X chromosomes influences protection from cardiac ischaemia/reperfusion injury in mice: one X is better than two.

Authors:  Jingyuan Li; Xuqi Chen; Rebecca McClusky; Maureen Ruiz-Sundstrom; Yuichiro Itoh; Soban Umar; Arthur P Arnold; Mansoureh Eghbali
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 5.  Refinement of experimental design and conduct in laboratory animal research.

Authors:  Jeremy D Bailoo; Thomas S Reichlin; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2014

6.  Studying both sexes: a guiding principle for biomedicine.

Authors:  Janine Austin Clayton
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Reframing sexual differentiation of the brain.

Authors:  Margaret M McCarthy; Arthur P Arnold
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 8.  Mouse models of advanced spontaneous metastasis for experimental therapeutics.

Authors:  Giulio Francia; William Cruz-Munoz; Shan Man; Ping Xu; Robert S Kerbel
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Comparative impact of trastuzumab and cyclophosphamide on HER-2-positive human breast cancer xenografts.

Authors:  Giulio Francia; Shan Man; Chyan-Jang Lee; Christina R Lee; Ping Xu; Miriam E Mossoba; Urban Emmenegger; Jeffrey A Medin; Robert S Kerbel
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Lawrence A Tabak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  117 in total

1.  Age and ischemia differentially impact mitochondrial ultrastructure and function in a novel model of age-associated estrogen deficiency in the female rat heart.

Authors:  Alexandra M Garvin; Nicole C Aurigemma; Jenna L Hackenberger; Donna H Korzick
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 2.  Synthesizing Views to Understand Sex Differences in Response to Early Life Adversity.

Authors:  Kevin G Bath
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Sex differences in the effectiveness of buprenorphine to decrease rates of responding in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Kathryn L Schwienteck; S Stevens Negus; Matthew L Banks
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 4.  Sex differences in neurodevelopmental abnormalities caused by early-life anaesthesia exposure: a narrative review.

Authors:  Omar H Cabrera; Thomas Gulvezan; Breanna Symmes; Nidia Quillinan; Vesna Jevtovic-Todorovic
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 5.  Pregnancy, postpartum and parity: Resilience and vulnerability in brain health and disease.

Authors:  Nicholas P Deems; Benedetta Leuner
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 8.606

6.  Collateral Development and Arteriogenesis in Hindlimbs of Swine After Ligation of Arterial Inflow.

Authors:  Yue Gao; Shruthi Aravind; Neesha S Patel; Matthew A Fuglestad; Joshua S Ungar; Constance J Mietus; Shuai Li; George P Casale; Iraklis I Pipinos; Mark A Carlson
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 7.  Consideration of Sex Differences in Design and Reporting of Experimental Arterial Pathology Studies-Statement From ATVB Council.

Authors:  Peggy Robinet; Dianna M Milewicz; Lisa A Cassis; Nicholas J Leeper; Hong S Lu; Jonathan D Smith
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 8.  Sex bias and omission in neuroscience research is influenced by research model and journal, but not reported NIH funding.

Authors:  Gabriella M Mamlouk; David M Dorris; Lily R Barrett; John Meitzen
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 8.606

9.  Encouraging Community Engagement in the Performance of Research at the Intersection of HIV and Aging.

Authors:  Maile Y Karris; Dorcas Baker; Jeffrey Berry; Brandon Brown; Stephen Karpiak; Jules Levin; Melanie Reese; Matthew Sharp; Jeff Taylor
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 2.205

10.  Quantity and Reporting Quality of Kidney Research.

Authors:  Markos Kyriakos Tomidis Chatzimanouil; Louise Wilkens; Hans-Joachim Anders
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.