| Literature DB >> 27682121 |
Romina P Pizzolitto1,2, Jimena M Herrera3,4, Yesica P Zaio5,6, Jose S Dambolena7,8, Maria P Zunino9,10, Mauro N Gallucci11, Julio A Zygadlo12,13.
Abstract
Maize is one the most important staple foods in the world. However, numerous pests, such as fungal pathogens, e.g., Fusarium verticillioides, and insects, such as Sitophlilus zeamais, attack maize grains during storage. Many F. verticillioides strains produce fumonisins, one of the most important mycotoxin that causes toxic effects on human and animal health. This situation is aggravated by the insect fungal vector, Sitophlilus zeamais, which contributes to the dispersal of fungal spores, and through feeding damage, provide entry points for fungal infections. The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro bioassays, the antifungal activity on F. verticillioides M3125 and repellent effects against S. zeamais of ketone terpenes. In addition, we performed Quantitative structure-activity relationship (Q-SAR) studies between physico-chemical properties of ketone terpenes and the antifungal effect. Thymoquinone was the most active compound against F. verticillioides (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration, MIC: 0.87) affecting the lag phase and the growth rate showing a total inhibition of growth at concentration higher than 2 mM (p < 0.05). The Q-SAR model revealed that the antifungal activity of ketone compounds is related to the electronic descriptor, Pi energy. Thymoquinone showed a strong repellent effect (-77.8 ± 8.5, p < 0.001) against S. zeamais. These findings make an important contribution to the search for new compounds to control two stored pests of maize.Entities:
Keywords: F. verticillioides; Q-SAR; S. zeamais; α,β-unsaturated ketones
Year: 2015 PMID: 27682121 PMCID: PMC5023262 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms3040851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Chemical structures of ketones compounds studied in the present work.
Antifungal activity of ketone compounds against Fusarium verticillioides M3125 strain.
| Compounds | MIC A | LD25 B | Inhibition (%) ± SD C | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration (mM) | |||||||||
| 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.75 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 3 | |||
| thymoquinone | 0.87 | 0.23 | 23.7 ± 18.1 *,d | 60.7 ± 41.1 * c | 89.7 ± 11.9 *,a | 75.2 ± 18.6 *,a | 85.3 ± 18.7 *,a | 100 ± 0 *,a | 99.4 ± 1.2 *,a |
| 4.56 | 1.02 | 7.6 ± 10.0 e | 13.7 ± 9.3 e | 21.0 ± 5.5 *,d | 22.3 ± 13.2 *,d | 38.4 ± 7.6 *,c | 45.3 ± 7.5 *,c | 66.2 ± 8.3 *,d | |
| 3.84 | 1.48 | 0 f | 1.5 ± 2.9 f | 7.3 ± 8.9 f | 13.1 ± 11.3 e | 38.6 ± 12.1 *,c | 58.8 ± 7.4 *,b | 42.0 ± 11.1 *,c | |
| pulegone | 6.38 | 1.57 | 1.2 ± 1.4 f | 13.8 ± 5.3 * e | 10.9 ± 11.4 e | 15.7 ± 7.0 *,e | 21.6 ± 10.0 *,d | 34.5 ± 4.5 *,c | 46.6 ± 5.8 *,c |
| dihydrocarvone | 13.57 | 4.19 | 0 f | 0 f | 0 f | 0.6 ± 1.2 f | 1.2 ± 1.4 f | 8.6 ± 4.6 e | 2.3 ± 2.7 f |
| menthone | ND | ND | 0 f | 0 f | 0 f | 0 f | 1.5 ± 2.9 f | 0 f | 0 f |
| verbenone | 4.90 | 2.43 | 0 f | 1.2 ± 2.3 f | 1.8 ± 2.2 f | 0.6 ± 1.2 f | 1.5 ± 1.8 f | 4.9 ± 6.1 f | 44.6 ± 11.7 *,c |
| α-thujone | ND | ND | 0 f | 0 f | 0.6 ± 1.2 f | 0 f | 0 f | 0 f | 0 f |
| camphor | 26.64 | 7.94 | 0 f | 0 f | 0 f | 0 f | 0 f | 0 f | 4.3 ± 5.0 f |
A Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC); B The lethal doses25 (LD25). The LD25 values were used in multiple linear regression analyses (MLR); ND: No determinate; C Inhibition of fungal growth was determined after 7 days of incubation. Values are expressed as means ± SD; * Indicate significant difference with the control and values having different letters are significantly different from each treatment according to DGC test of multiple range (p < 0.05). The experiments were performed twice in triplicate.
Figure 2Effects of ketone compounds on the growth rate (A) and lag phase (B) of F. verticillioides M3125 strain.
Physicochemical descriptors used in the QSAR study.
| Compounds | Dreiding Energy kcal/mol | Dipolo (Debye) | Molar Refractivity | Surface Tension (dyne/cm) | Volume (A3) | Minimal Projection Area (A2) | Maximal Projection Area (A2) | Molar Volume (cm3) | Log P | Pi Energy | Boiling Point C HectoPascal | Polarizability ×10−24 cm3) | Enthalpy of Vaporization (Kj/mol) | Polar Surface Area (A2) | Solvent Accessible Surface Area | pKa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| thymoquinone | 34.46 | 0.12 | 48.89 | 35.8 | 159 | 32.29 | 53.09 | 154.1 | 2.33 | 12.42 | 309 | 18.1 | 46.9 | 34.14 | 245.95 | −7.75 |
| carvone | 35 | 3.2 | 47.17 | 29.8 | 156.9 | 31.02 | 50.97 | 159.8 | 2.27 | 7.81 | 307 | 18 | 46.7 | 17.07 | 248.75 | −4.66 |
| pulegone | 40.89 | 2.88 | 47.13 | 29.5 | 164.5 | 31.96 | 53.06 | 164.8 | 2.56 | 5.81 | 298 | 18.2 | 46 | 17.07 | 277.53 | −4.43 |
| dihydrocarvone | 27.07 | 2.79 | 46.3 | 27.98 | 164.9 | 31.45 | 51.84 | 168.47 | 3.22 | 5.3 | 294 | 18.19 | 45.79 | 17.07 | 274.86 | −7.42 |
| menthone | 27.39 | 2.73 | 46.52 | 27.3 | 172.6 | 30.28 | 57.81 | 175.1 | 2.63 | 3.3 | 273 | 18.4 | 44.1 | 17.07 | 300.97 | −7.42 |
| verbenone | 92.48 | 3.79 | 45.37 | 29.46 | 154.3 | 34.84 | 46.84 | 151.4 | 2.14 | 5.81 | 302 | 17.48 | 46.41 | 17.07 | 253.13 | −4.73 |
| thujone | 146.8 | 2.76 | 44.54 | 35 | 160.1 | 34.23 | 47.95 | 150.8 | 1.9 | 3.3 | 266 | 17.6 | 43.7 | 17.07 | 283.79 | −7.42 |
| camphor | 51.95 | 3.02 | 44.49 | 31.6 | 161.3 | 37.48 | 42.7 | 154.9 | 2.13 | 3.3 | 275 | 17.6 | 44.4 | 17.07 | 284.25 | −7.49 |
The descriptors were obtained by [20].
Topological descriptors used in the QSAR study.
| Compounds | Platt Index | Randic Index | Balaban Index | Harary Index | Wiener Index | Hyper Wiener Index | Wiener Polarity | Szeged Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| thymoquinone | 34 | 5.52 | 2.55 | 30.7 | 187 | 417 | 17 | 292 |
| Carvone * | 30 | 5.11 | 2.18 | 26.5 | 152 | 337 | 17 | 240 |
| pulegone | 30 | 5.11 | 2.22 | 26.6 | 150 | 327 | 14 | 236 |
| dihydrocarvone | 30 | 5.11 | 2.18 | 26.5 | 152 | 337 | 14 | 240 |
| menthone | 30 | 5.11 | 2.22 | 26.6 | 150 | 327 | 14 | 236 |
| verbenone | 40 | 5.03 | 2.2 | 28.58 | 132 | 252 | 16 | 272 |
| thujone | 40 | 5.08 | 2.13 | 28.05 | 139 | 283 | 15 | 169 |
| camphor | 42 | 4.98 | 2.4 | 29.58 | 123 | 219 | 19 | 174 |
The descriptors were obtained by [20]; * the chirality was not taken into account.
Figure 3Plot of observed values (1/LD25) vs. the descriptor Pi Energy. The observed values of the ketones compounds are shown in black circle, and the predicted values (according to Equation (1)) are shown in grey circle.
Figure 4Plot of observed values (1/LD25) vs. the descriptor Pi Energy. The observed values of the ketones compounds are shown in black circle, and the predicted values (according to Equation (2)) are shown in grey circle.
Figure 5Behavioural responses of S. zeamais adults to ketone terpenes. * p ≤ 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 (significant response to experimental stimulus; paired-sample T test). Values having different letters are significantly different from each treatment according to Duncan’s multiple range test at p ≤ 0.05 (n = 5); (−) values of RI indicate repellence; (+) values of RI indicate attraction.