Johnson W McRorie1, William D Chey2. 1. Global Clinical Sciences, Procter & Gamble, Mason Business Center, 8700 Mason-Montgomery Road, Mason, OH, 45040, USA. mcrorie.jw@pg.com. 2. University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Misconceptions about the effects of dietary fiber and 'functional' fiber on stool parameters and constipation persist in the literature. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted with the use of the Scopus and PubMed scientific databases to identify and objectively assess well-controlled clinical studies that evaluated the effects of fiber on stool parameters and constipation. RESULTS: The totality of well-controlled randomized clinical studies show that, to exert a laxative effect, fiber must: (1) resist fermentation to remain intact throughout the large bowel and present in stool, and (2) significantly increase stool water content and stool output, resulting in soft/bulky/easy-to-pass stools. Poorly fermented insoluble fiber (e.g., wheat bran) remains as discreet particles which can mechanically irritate the gut mucosa, stimulating water & mucous secretion if the particles are sufficiently large/coarse. For soluble fibers, some have no effect on viscosity (e.g., inulin, wheat dextrin) while others form high viscosity gels (e.g., β-glucan, psyllium). If the soluble fiber is readily fermented, whether non-viscous or gel-forming, it has no effect on stool output or stool water content, and has no laxative effect. In contrast, a non-fermented, gel-forming soluble fiber (e.g., psyllium) retains its gelled nature and high water-holding capacity throughout the large bowel, resulting in soft/bulky/easy-to-pass stools. CONCLUSION: When considering a recommendation for a fiber supplement regimen to treat and/or prevent constipation, it is important to consider which fibers have the physical characteristics to exert a laxative effect, and which fiber supplements have rigorous clinical evidence of a significant benefit in patients with constipation.
BACKGROUND: Misconceptions about the effects of dietary fiber and 'functional' fiber on stool parameters and constipation persist in the literature. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted with the use of the Scopus and PubMed scientific databases to identify and objectively assess well-controlled clinical studies that evaluated the effects of fiber on stool parameters and constipation. RESULTS: The totality of well-controlled randomized clinical studies show that, to exert a laxative effect, fiber must: (1) resist fermentation to remain intact throughout the large bowel and present in stool, and (2) significantly increase stool water content and stool output, resulting in soft/bulky/easy-to-pass stools. Poorly fermented insoluble fiber (e.g., wheat bran) remains as discreet particles which can mechanically irritate the gut mucosa, stimulating water & mucous secretion if the particles are sufficiently large/coarse. For soluble fibers, some have no effect on viscosity (e.g., inulin, wheat dextrin) while others form high viscosity gels (e.g., β-glucan, psyllium). If the soluble fiber is readily fermented, whether non-viscous or gel-forming, it has no effect on stool output or stool water content, and has no laxative effect. In contrast, a non-fermented, gel-forming soluble fiber (e.g., psyllium) retains its gelled nature and high water-holding capacity throughout the large bowel, resulting in soft/bulky/easy-to-pass stools. CONCLUSION: When considering a recommendation for a fiber supplement regimen to treat and/or prevent constipation, it is important to consider which fibers have the physical characteristics to exert a laxative effect, and which fiber supplements have rigorous clinical evidence of a significant benefit in patients with constipation.
Authors: Nathaniel D Fastinger; Lisa K Karr-Lilienthal; Julie K Spears; Kelly S Swanson; Krista E Zinn; Gerardo M Nava; Kazuhiro Ohkuma; Sumiko Kanahori; Dennis T Gordon; George C Fahey Journal: J Am Coll Nutr Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: C Molis; B Flourié; F Ouarne; M F Gailing; S Lartigue; A Guibert; F Bornet; J P Galmiche Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 1996-09 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: J McRorie; J Kesler; L Bishop; T Filloon; G Allgood; M Sutton; T Hunt; A Laurent; C Rudolph Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Peter I Duncan; Catherine F Enters-Weijnen; Nashmil Emami; Peter McLean; Tiago Nunes; Maurice Beaumont; Rafael Crabbe; Kevin Whelan; S Mark Scott; Niek J deWit; Teunis Weits; Gabriela Bergonzelli; Diederick E Grobbee Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Hyoung Il Choi; Jae Myung Cha; In-Kyung Jeong; In-Jin Cho; Jin Young Yoon; Min Seob Kwak; Jung Won Jeon; Soo Jin Kim Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Ramon Estruch; Eulàlia Vendrell; Ana María Ruiz-León; Rosa Casas; Sara Castro-Barquero; Xavier Alvarez Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-06-07 Impact factor: 5.717