Literature DB >> 27680524

Solid Implants in Facial Plastic Surgery: Potential Complications and How to Prevent Them.

Krishna Patel1, Kathleyn Brandstetter1.   

Abstract

Allogenic implants are an effective alternative to autologous grafts in the reconstruction of facial defects. These implants are used to reconstruct a variety of bony and soft-tissue defects, including the frontal and temporal regions; internal orbit; infraorbital rim; malar, paranasal, and nasal regions; mandible; and chin. In comparison to their autologous counterparts, alloplastic materials are more readily available, lack donor-site morbidity, decrease surgical time and cost, and still have relatively good postoperative tissue tolerance. However, these implants are not without their own spectrum of complications. Common solid implant materials include silicone, GoreTex (expanded polytetrafluorethylene; W. L. Gore & Associates Inc., Flagstaff, AZ), MedPor (high-density porous polyethylene; Porex Industries, Fairburn, GA), and Mersilene mesh (nonresorbable polyester fiber; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). Each of these materials poses certain complication risks based on their surface contour (smooth vs. porous), pliability, and reactivity with surrounding tissue. In addition, certain implant locations within the head and neck are at risk for different postoperative complications. Although there are no evidence-based guidelines for implant reconstruction to help avoid common complications, there are several principles and techniques that are commonly employed by surgeons to help reduce complication rates. These include careful patient selection, proper choice of operative procedure, infection control practices (including pre/intraoperative systemic antibiotics, meticulous aseptic technique, impregnation/soaking of implant in antibiotic, irrigation of implant pocket with antibiotic, careful closure of tissue layers, and postoperative oral antibiotics), preoperative implant shaping, choice of surgical approach, and intraoperative surgical techniques. Larger, controlled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of the aforementioned techniques in the reduction of postoperative complications. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27680524     DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1586497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 0736-6825            Impact factor:   1.446


  8 in total

1.  In vitro maturation and in vivo stability of bioprinted human nasal cartilage.

Authors:  Xiaoyi Lan; Yan Liang; Margaret Vyhlidal; Esra Jn Erkut; Melanie Kunze; Aillette Mulet-Sierra; Martin Osswald; Khalid Ansari; Hadi Seikaly; Yaman Boluk; Adetola B Adesida
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 7.940

2.  Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Correlation Between Practice and Evidence.

Authors:  Peter Mankowski; Abhiram Cherukupalli; Karen Slater; Nick Carr
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  Nasolabial Sulcus Rejuvenation: Paranasal Augmentation Using a Folded Dermal Graft.

Authors:  Soo Hyang Lee; Ki Pyo Sung; Sean Kim; Heung-Kyu Kim
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 4.  Computational technology for nasal cartilage-related clinical research and application.

Authors:  Bing Shi; Hanyao Huang
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 6.344

Review 5.  Review of Plastic Surgery Biomaterials and Current Progress in Their 3D Manufacturing Technology.

Authors:  Wei Peng; Zhiyu Peng; Pei Tang; Huan Sun; Haoyuan Lei; Zhengyong Li; Didi Hui; Colin Du; Changchun Zhou; Yongwei Wang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Unusual complication after augmentation genioplasty: Odontogenic infection requiring implant removal.

Authors:  Tania Hassanzadeh; Arnold S Lee
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-08-24

7.  Adverse Events in Facial Implant Surgery and Associated Malpractice Litigation.

Authors:  Hani M Rayess; Peter Svider; Curtis Hanba; Vivek Sagar Patel; Michael Carron; Giancarlo Zuliani
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.611

8.  Improvement of biohistological response of facial implant materials by tantalum surface treatment.

Authors:  Mohammed Mousa Bakri; Sung Ho Lee; Jong Ho Lee
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-11-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.