Literature DB >> 27677490

Diagnostic utility of invasive EEG for epilepsy surgery: Indications, modalities, and techniques.

Prasanna Jayakar1, Jean Gotman2, A Simon Harvey3, André Palmini4, Laura Tassi5, Donald Schomer6, Francois Dubeau2, Fabrice Bartolomei7, Alice Yu8, Pavel Kršek9, Demetrios Velis10, Philippe Kahane11.   

Abstract

Many patients with medically refractory epilepsy now undergo successful surgery based on noninvasive diagnostic information, but intracranial electroencephalography (IEEG) continues to be used as increasingly complex cases are considered surgical candidates. The indications for IEEG and the modalities employed vary across epilepsy surgical centers; each modality has its advantages and limitations. IEEG can be performed in the same intraoperative setting, that is, intraoperative electrocorticography, or through an independent implantation procedure with chronic extraoperative recordings; the latter are not only resource intensive but also carry risk. A lack of understanding of IEEG limitations predisposes to data misinterpretation that can lead to denying surgery when indicated or, worse yet, incorrect resection with adverse outcomes. Given the lack of class 1 or 2 evidence on IEEG, a consensus-based expert recommendation on the diagnostic utility of IEEG is presented, with emphasis on the application of various modalities in specific substrates or locations, taking into account their relative efficacy, safety, ease, and incremental cost-benefit. These recommendations aim to curtail outlying indications that risk the over- or underutilization of IEEG, while retaining substantial flexibility in keeping with most standard practices at epilepsy centers and addressing some of the needs of resource-poor regions around the world. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
© 2016 International League Against Epilepsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epilepsy surgery; Indications; Intracranial EEG; Utility

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27677490     DOI: 10.1111/epi.13515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  33 in total

1.  Illusory own body perceptions mapped in the cingulate cortex-An intracranial stimulation study.

Authors:  Irina Popa; Andrei Barborica; Julia Scholly; Cristian Donos; Fabrice Bartolomei; Stanislas Lagarde; Edouard Hirsch; Maria-Paola Valenti-Hirsch; Mihai Dragos Maliia; Anca Adriana Arbune; Andrei Daneasa; Jean Ciurea; Ovidiu-Alexandru Bajenaru; Ioana Mindruta
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Using 3D-Printed Mesh-Like Brain Cortex with Deep Structures for Planning Intracranial EEG Electrode Placement.

Authors:  Ramin Javan; Maureen Schickel; Yuanlong Zhao; Terry Agbo; Cullen Fleming; Parisa Heidari; Taha Gholipour; Donald C Shields; Mohamad Koubeissi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Stereoelectroencephalography Versus Subdural Electrodes for Localization of the Epileptogenic Zone: What Is the Evidence?

Authors:  Joel S Katz; Taylor J Abel
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Intraoperative fast ripples independently predict postsurgical epilepsy outcome: Comparison with other electrocorticographic phenomena.

Authors:  Shaun A Hussain; Gary W Mathern; Phoebe Hung; Julius Weng; Raman Sankar; Joyce Y Wu
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.045

Review 5.  UltraHigh Field MR Imaging in Epilepsy.

Authors:  Gaurav Verma; Bradley N Delman; Priti Balchandani
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.266

6.  Underutilization of advanced presurgical studies and high rates of vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: a single-center experience and recommendations.

Authors:  Elena Solli; Nicole A Colwell; Christopher Markosian; Anmol S Johal; Rebecca Houston; M Omar Iqbal; Irene Say; Joseph I Petrsoric; Luke D Tomycz
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Comparative Effectiveness of Stereotactic Electroencephalography Versus Subdural Grids in Epilepsy Surgery.

Authors:  Lara Jehi; Marcia Morita-Sherman; Thomas E Love; Fabrice Bartolomei; William Bingaman; Kees Braun; Robyn M Busch; John Duncan; Walter J Hader; Guoming Luan; John D Rolston; Stephan Schuele; Laura Tassi; Sumeet Vadera; Shehryar Sheikh; Imad Najm; Amir Arain; Justin Bingaman; Beate Diehl; Jane de Tisi; Matea Rados; Pieter Van Eijsden; Sandra Wahby; Xiongfei Wang; Samuel Wiebe
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 11.274

8.  Can histologically normal epileptogenic zone share common electrophysiological phenotypes with focal cortical dysplasia? SEEG-based study in MRI-negative epileptic patients.

Authors:  Stanislas Lagarde; Julia Scholly; Irina Popa; Maria Paola Valenti-Hirsch; Agnès Trebuchon; Aileen McGonigal; Mathieu Milh; Anke M Staack; Béatrice Lannes; Benoît Lhermitte; François Proust; Mustapha Benmekhbi; Didier Scavarda; Romain Carron; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Edouard Hirsch; Fabrice Bartolomei
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Data-driven method to infer the seizure propagation patterns in an epileptic brain from intracranial electroencephalography.

Authors:  Viktor Sip; Meysam Hashemi; Anirudh N Vattikonda; Marmaduke M Woodman; Huifang Wang; Julia Scholly; Samuel Medina Villalon; Maxime Guye; Fabrice Bartolomei; Viktor K Jirsa
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Contribution of Ictal Source Imaging for Localizing Seizure Onset Zone in Patients With Focal Epilepsy.

Authors:  Shuai Ye; Lin Yang; Yunfeng Lu; Michal T Kucewicz; Benjamin Brinkmann; Cindy Nelson; Abbas Sohrabpour; Gregory A Worrell; Bin He
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.