Nita Khandelwal1, David Benkeser2, Norma B Coe3, Ruth A Engelberg4, J Randall Curtis4. 1. 1 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and. 2. 2 Department of Biostatistics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California. 3. 3 Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and. 4. 4 Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, and.
Abstract
RATIONALE: In the intensive care unit (ICU), complex decision making by clinicians and families requires good communication to ensure that care is consistent with the patients' values and goals. OBJECTIVES: To assess the economic feasibility of staffing ICUs with a communication facilitator. METHODS: Data were from a randomized trial of an "ICU communication facilitator" linked to hospital financial records; eligible patients (n = 135) were admitted to the ICU at a single hospital with predicted mortality ≥30% and a surrogate decision maker. Adjusted regression analyses assessed differences in ICU total and direct variable costs between intervention and control patients. A bootstrap-based simulation assessed the cost efficiency of a facilitator while varying the full-time equivalent of the facilitator and the ICU mortality risk. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Total ICU costs (mean 22.8k; 95% CI, -42.0k to -3.6k; P = 0.02) and average daily ICU costs (mean, -0.38k; 95% CI, -0.65k to -0.11k; P = 0.006)] were reduced significantly with the intervention. Despite more contacts, families of survivors spent less time per encounter with facilitators than did families of decedents (mean, 25 [SD, 11] min vs. 36 [SD, 14] min). Simulation demonstrated maximal weekly savings with a 1.0 full-time equivalent facilitator and a predicted ICU mortality of 15% (total weekly ICU cost savings, $58.4k [95% CI, $57.7k-59.2k]; weekly direct variable savings, $5.7k [95% CI, $5.5k-5.8k]) after incorporating facilitator costs. CONCLUSIONS: Adding a full-time trained communication facilitator in the ICU may improve the quality of care while simultaneously reducing short-term (direct variable) and long-term (total) health care costs. This intervention is likely to be more cost effective in a lower-mortality population.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: In the intensive care unit (ICU), complex decision making by clinicians and families requires good communication to ensure that care is consistent with the patients' values and goals. OBJECTIVES: To assess the economic feasibility of staffing ICUs with a communication facilitator. METHODS: Data were from a randomized trial of an "ICU communication facilitator" linked to hospital financial records; eligible patients (n = 135) were admitted to the ICU at a single hospital with predicted mortality ≥30% and a surrogate decision maker. Adjusted regression analyses assessed differences in ICU total and direct variable costs between intervention and control patients. A bootstrap-based simulation assessed the cost efficiency of a facilitator while varying the full-time equivalent of the facilitator and the ICU mortality risk. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Total ICU costs (mean 22.8k; 95% CI, -42.0k to -3.6k; P = 0.02) and average daily ICU costs (mean, -0.38k; 95% CI, -0.65k to -0.11k; P = 0.006)] were reduced significantly with the intervention. Despite more contacts, families of survivors spent less time per encounter with facilitators than did families of decedents (mean, 25 [SD, 11] min vs. 36 [SD, 14] min). Simulation demonstrated maximal weekly savings with a 1.0 full-time equivalent facilitator and a predicted ICU mortality of 15% (total weekly ICU cost savings, $58.4k [95% CI, $57.7k-59.2k]; weekly direct variable savings, $5.7k [95% CI, $5.5k-5.8k]) after incorporating facilitator costs. CONCLUSIONS: Adding a full-time trained communication facilitator in the ICU may improve the quality of care while simultaneously reducing short-term (direct variable) and long-term (total) health care costs. This intervention is likely to be more cost effective in a lower-mortality population.
Entities:
Keywords:
communication; critical care; intensive care unit costs; palliative care
Authors: Daliana Peres Bota; Christian Melot; Flavio Lopes Ferreira; Vinh Nguyen Ba; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2002-09-06 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: J Randall Curtis; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Patsy D Treece; Lois Downey; Danae Dotolo; Sarah E Shannon; Anthony L Back; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Ruth A Engelberg Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-09-10 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Lawrence J Schneiderman; Todd Gilmer; Holly D Teetzel; Daniel O Dugan; Jeffrey Blustein; Ronald Cranford; Kathleen B Briggs; Glen I Komatsu; Paula Goodman-Crews; Felicia Cohn; Ernlé W D Young Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-09-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Christopher E Cox; Deepshikha Charan Ashana; Nita Khandelwal; Arif H Kamal; Ruth A Engelberg Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 5.576
Authors: Lior Bibas; Maude Peretz-Larochelle; Neill K Adhikari; Michael J Goldfarb; Adriana Luk; Marina Englesakis; Michael E Detsky; Patrick R Lawler Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-07-03
Authors: Leopoldo M Amendola; Alessandro Galazzi; Irene Zainaghi; Ivan Cortinovis; Anna Zolin; Rik T Gerritsen; Ileana Adamini; Maura Lusignani; Dario Laquintana Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-28 Impact factor: 3.390