Literature DB >> 27670287

Incremental validity of the PID-5 in relation to the five factor model and traditional polythetic personality criteria of the DSM-5.

J Christopher Fowler1,2, Michelle A Patriquin1,2, Alok Madan1,2, Jon G Allen1,2, B Christopher Frueh1,2,3, John M Oldham1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the incremental validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) beyond the impact of demographic, burden of illness, five-factor model of personality, and DSM-5 personality disorder criteria with respect to associations with admission psychiatric symptoms and functional disability.
METHODS: Psychiatric inpatients (N = 927) were administered the Big Five Inventory, PID-5, and personality disorder criteria counts. Prior treatment utilization, as well as baseline depression, anxiety, emotion regulation, and functional disability were administered within two days of the personality measures. Hierarchical regression models were used to explore the association of personality functioning with symptom functioning, emotion regulation and disability.
RESULTS: Neuroticism was associated with all symptom measures, providing further support for its relevance in clinical populations. Personality trait domains (negative affect, detachment, and psychoticism) from the PID-5 demonstrated incremental validity in predicting baseline symptom and disability functioning over and above demographic, burden of illness, and psychiatric comorbidity and five-factor model (FFM) personality traits.
CONCLUSIONS: Dimensional measures of personality functioning were consistently associated with baseline symptom functioning, supporting the relevance of personality functioning as it relates to psychiatric symptoms. The PID-5 uniquely contributed to the prediction of baseline symptom functioning, thus providing incremental validity over gold-standard personality trait measures.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  incremental validity; methodology; personality traits; psychometrics; scale validation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27670287      PMCID: PMC6877239          DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 1049-8931            Impact factor:   4.035


  59 in total

1.  Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5 Part I: Description and rationale.

Authors:  Andrew E Skodol; Lee Anna Clark; Donna S Bender; Robert F Krueger; Leslie C Morey; Roel Verheul; Renato D Alarcon; Carl C Bell; Larry J Siever; John M Oldham
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2011-01

2.  Linking "big" personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roman Kotov; Wakiza Gamez; Frank Schmidt; David Watson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Reliability and validity of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults.

Authors:  Andrea Fossati; Robert F Krueger; Kristian E Markon; Serena Borroni; Cesare Maffei
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2013-09-24

4.  Interrelations between psychosocial functioning and adaptive- and maladaptive-range personality traits.

Authors:  Eunyoe Ro; Lee Anna Clark
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2013-08

5.  A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7.

Authors:  Robert L Spitzer; Kurt Kroenke; Janet B W Williams; Bernd Löwe
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-05-22

6.  Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Robert L Spitzer; Janet B W Williams; Patrick O Monahan; Bernd Löwe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  DSM-5 personality traits and DSM-IV personality disorders.

Authors:  Christopher J Hopwood; Katherine M Thomas; Kristian E Markon; Aidan G C Wright; Robert F Krueger
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2012-01-16

8.  A longitudinal twin study of personality and major depression in women.

Authors:  K S Kendler; M C Neale; R C Kessler; A C Heath; L J Eaves
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1993-11

9.  Examination of the Section III DSM-5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample.

Authors:  Lauren R Few; Joshua D Miller; Alex O Rothbaum; Suzanne Meller; Jessica Maples; Douglas P Terry; Brittany Collins; James MacKillop
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2013-11

10.  Common and unique associated factors for medically unexplained chronic widespread pain and chronic fatigue.

Authors:  J McBeth; B Tomenson; C A Chew-Graham; G J Macfarlane; J Jackson; A Littlewood; F H Creed
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.006

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.

Authors:  Johannes Zimmermann; André Kerber; Katharina Rek; Christopher J Hopwood; Robert F Krueger
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Incremental validity of the PID-5 in relation to the five factor model and traditional polythetic personality criteria of the DSM-5.

Authors:  J Christopher Fowler; Michelle A Patriquin; Alok Madan; Jon G Allen; B Christopher Frueh; John M Oldham
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Psychometric study of the brazilian version of the personality inventory for DSM-5-paper-and-pencil version.

Authors:  Ana Maria Barchi-Ferreira; Flávia de Lima Osório
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 5.435

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.