| Literature DB >> 27670261 |
Nienke Zwakman1, Rafli van de Laar1,2, Toon Van Gorp1,3, Petra L M Zusterzeel2, Marc P M L Snijders4, Isabel Ferreira5, Leon F A G Massuger2, Roy F P M Kruitwagen1,6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) the volume of residual tumor after debulking is known as prognostic factor for survival. We wanted to examine the relationship between postoperative decline in serum CA125 and residual disease after cytoreductive surgery and evaluate perioperative changes in serum CA125 levels as predictor for disease-specific survival.Entities:
Keywords: CA-125 Antigen; Neoplasm, Residual; Ovarian Neoplasms; Prognosis; Survival
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27670261 PMCID: PMC5165075 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Gynecol Oncol ISSN: 2005-0380 Impact factor: 4.401
Fig. 1Flowchart describing the study sample selection.
Characteristics of the study population
| Variable | Patients included (n=123) | Patients excluded (n=108)* | p-value† | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr)‡ | 61.3 (52.1-68.5) | 61.4 (51.1-70.1) | 0.950 | |
| Histology | 0.030 | |||
| Serous | 83 (67.5%) | 64 (59.3%) | ||
| Mucinous | 9 (7.3%) | 7 (6.5%) | ||
| Endometrioid | 9 (7.3%) | 10 (9.2%) | ||
| Clear cell | 5 (4.1%) | 6 (5.6%) | ||
| Adenocarcinoma NOS | 13 (10.6%) | 10 (9.2%) | ||
| Carcinosarcoma | 3 (2.4%) | 9 (0%) | ||
| Other | 1 (0.8%) | 11 (10.2%) | ||
| Tumor grade | 0.280 | |||
| 1 | 7 (5.7%) | 11 (10.2%) | ||
| 2 | 26 (21.2%) | 25 (23.1%) | ||
| 3 | 65 (52.8%) | 47 (43.5%) | ||
| Unknown | 25 (20.3%) | 25 (23.2%) | ||
| FIGO stage | 0.050 | |||
| II | 10 (8.1%) | 19 (17.6%) | ||
| III | 89 (72.4%) | 76 (70.4%) | ||
| IV | 24 (19.5%) | 13 (12.0%) | ||
| Ascites | 0.010 | |||
| None | 34 (27.6%) | 13 (12.0%) | ||
| 0–1,000 mL | 27 (22.0%) | 35 (32.4%) | ||
| >1,000 mL | 51 (41.5%) | 45 (41.7%) | ||
| Unknown | 11 (8.9%) | 15 (13.9%) | ||
| Residual tumor size after debulking | 0.320 | |||
| Complete | 33 (26.8%) | 37 (34.2%) | ||
| Optimal | 47 (38.2%) | 42 (38.9%) | ||
| Suboptimal | 43 (35.0%) | 29 (26.9%) | ||
| Extensive surgery | 0.030 | |||
| Yes | 48 (39.0%) | 28 (25.9%) | ||
| No | 75 (61.0%) | 80 (74.1%) | ||
| CA125, U/mL | ||||
| Preoperative | 650 (504–837) | |||
| Postoperative | 197 (159–243) | |||
| Perioperative decline | 427 (310–588) | |||
| Follow-up time (mo)§ | 31 (18–49) | |||
FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
*Excluded due to a lack of data regarding CA125 levels; †Unpaired t test (age) and χ2 test (other characteristics); ‡Mean (interquartile range); §Geometric means (95% confidence interval).
Comparisons of levels of perioperative CA125 by category of surgery outcome
| CA125 by category of surgery outcome | Descriptive | Comparisons | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA125, in U/mL | Loge CA125 | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||||||
| Geometric mean (95% CI) | Mean (SD) | ß | 95% CI | p-value | ß | 95% CI | p-value | ||
| Preoperative | |||||||||
| Inadequate (n=43) | 908 (569–1,450) | 6.81 (1.52) | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Optimal (n=47) | 610 (433–859) | 6.41 (1.52) | −0.40 | −0.98, 0.18 | 0.181 | −0.36 | −0.93, 0.24 | 0.226 | |
| Complete (n=33) | 460 (264–800) | 6.13 (1.57) | −0.68 | −1.32, −0.04 | 0.037 | −0.68 | −1.31, −0.05 | 0.035 | |
| Linear trend | 0.034 | Linear trend | 0.033 | ||||||
| Postoperative | |||||||||
| Inadequate (n=43) | 341 (229–508) | 5.83 (1.29) | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Optimal (n=47) | 170 (133–219) | 5.14 (0.56) | −0.70 | −1.17, −0.24 | 0.003 | −0.69 | −1.16, −0.23 | 0.004 | |
| Complete (n=33) | 118 (76–182) | 4.76 (1.28) | −1.06 | −1.57, −0.55 | <0.001 | −1.06 | −1.57, −0.55 | <0.001 | |
| Linear trend | <0.001 | Linear trend | <0.001 | ||||||
| Decline (pre-postoperative) | |||||||||
| Inadequate (n=43) | 522 (283–508) | 6.26 (1.89) | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Optimal (n=47) | 420 (271–650) | 6.04 (1.44) | −0.18 | −0.91, 0.57 | 0.652 | −0.17 | −0.92, 0.58 | 0.654 | |
| Complete (n=33) | 335 (166–678) | 5.82 (1.88) | −0.44 | −1.26, 0.37 | 0.287 | −0.44 | −1.27, 0.39 | 0.301 | |
| Linear trend | 0.289 | Linear trend | 0.303 | ||||||
Model 1, crude (i.e. unadjusted); Model 2, adjusted for potential confounders (i.e. patient’s age and time elapsed between preoperative CA125 assessment and surgery in comparisons of preoperative CA125; time between surgery and postoperative CA125 assessment in comparisons of postoperative CA125; both times in comparisons of perioperative decline in CA125). ß is the regression coefficient indicating the difference in preoperative CA125, postoperative CA125 and perioperative decline in (pre-post) CA125 in complete or optimal versus inadequate (referent) groups; note that because comparisons were performed on loge CA125 data the regression coefficient may need to be back transformed (by taking the anti-log of ß) for a more direct interpretation of the magnitude of the differences, which will then be expressed in percentage difference, i.e. (eß-1)*100; for instance, a ß of −0.40 indicates that the preoperative CA levels were 33% lower in the optimal vs. the inadequate groups.
SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval.
Fig. 2Decline in CA125 by categories of surgery outcome. (A) Absolute levels; (B) Relative levels (categorized and cross-tabulated).
Fig. 3Kaplan-Meier survival curves by categories of % perioperative decline in CA125.
Determinants of disease specific mortality
| Determinants | Events/N | Model 1 (unadjusted) | Model 2 (age-adjusted) | Model 3 (fully adjusted) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | p-value | HR | 95% CI | p-value | HR | 95% CI | p-value | |||
| Age (per 10 yr) | - | 1.04 | 0.83, 1.30 | 0.742 | - | - | - | 1.08 | 0.83, 1.40 | 0.568 | |
| Decline in CA125 | <0.001 | ||||||||||
| <50%* | 30/41 | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | - | - | |
| 50%–79% | 22/42 | 0.59 | 0.34, 1.05 | 0.071 | 0.58 | 0.33, 1.02 | 0.059 | 0.52 | 0.28, 0.96 | 0.036 | |
| ≥80% | 15/40 | 0.35 | 0.19, 0.67 | 0.001 | 0.34 | 0.18, 0.65 | 0.001 | 0.26 | 0.13, 0.54 | 0.001 | |
| Histology | |||||||||||
| Other | 26/40 | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | - | - | |
| Serous | 41/83 | 0.62 | 0.37, 1.02 | 0.062 | 0.61 | 0.37, 1.02 | 0.061 | 0.46 | 0.26, 0.81 | 0.007 | |
| Tumor grade | 0.687 | ||||||||||
| 1 or 2 | 19/33 | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | - | - | |
| 3 | 33/65 | 0.96 | 0.53, 1.75 | 0.896 | 0.94 | 0.52, 1.72 | 0.851 | 1.11 | 0.59, 2.08 | 0.810 | |
| Unknown | 15/25 | 0.85 | 0.43, 1.69 | 0.644 | 0.81 | 0.40, 1.66 | 0.568 | 1.01 | 0.53, 1.94 | 0.972 | |
| FIGO | |||||||||||
| IV | 17/24 | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | - | - | |
| III | 49/89 | 0.71 | 0.40, 1.26 | 0.240 | 0.71 | 0.40, 1.25 | 0.236 | 1.01 | 0.53, 1.94 | 0.972 | |
| II | 1/10 | 0.09 | 0.01, 0.72 | 0.022 | 0.09 | 0.01, 0.72 | 0.023 | 0.17 | 0.02, 1.44 | 0.104 | |
| Ascites | 0.710 | ||||||||||
| None | 16/34 | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | - | - | |
| 0–1,000 | 10/27 | 0.80 | 0.35, 1.80 | 0.586 | 0.80 | 0.35, 1.81 | 0.792 | 0.75 | 0.32, 1.77 | 0.509 | |
| >1,000 | 34/51 | 1.41 | 0.76, 2.60 | 0.277 | 1.41 | 0.76, 2.60 | 0.277 | 1.33 | 0.67, 2.64 | 0.413 | |
| Unknown | 7/11 | 1.10 | 0.45, 2.70 | 0.747 | 1.10 | 0.45, 2.60 | 0.828 | 0.81 | 0.31, 2.15 | 0.675 | |
| Extensive surgery | |||||||||||
| No | 41/75 | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | - | - | |
| Yes | 26/48 | 0.98 | 0.59, 1.62 | 0.927 | 0.98 | 0.59, 1.62 | 0.924 | 0.80 | 0.47, 1.38 | 0.427 | |
| Surgery outcome | |||||||||||
| Inadequate | 30/43 | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | - | - | 1.00 | - | - | |
| Optimal | 26/47 | 0.70 | 0.41, 1.20 | 0.201 | 0.72 | 0.42, 1.23 | 0.225 | 0.81 | 0.44, 1.50 | 0.509 | |
| Complete | 11/33 | 0.35 | 0.17, 0.71 | 0.003 | 0.34 | 0.17, 0.69 | 0.003 | 0.52 | 0.23, 1.22 | 0.133 | |
Model 1, crude (i.e. unadjusted); Model 2, adjusted for age; Model 3, fully adjusted model (i.e. model 2 + all determinants considered).
HR, hazard ratio (vs. referent category as indicated by HR=1.00); CI, confidence interval; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
*Includes 10 patients in whom no changes or slight increases in CA125 were observed between pre- and postoperative.
Determinants of disease specific mortality
| Determinants | Fully adjusted model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | p-value | ||
| Age (per 10 yr) | 1.12 | 0.86, 1.46 | 0.410 | |
| Decline in CA125 | ||||
| Loge[CA125pre-post] | 0.74 | 0.60, 0.90 | 0.003 | |
| Histology | ||||
| Other | 1.00 | - | - | |
| Serous | 0.50 | 0.29, 0.88 | 0.013 | |
| Tumor grade | ||||
| 1 or 2 | 1.00 | - | - | |
| 3 | 1.02 | 0.54, 1.96 | 0.940 | |
| Unknown | 0.97 | 0.44, 2.14 | 0.932 | |
| FIGO | ||||
| IV | 1.00 | - | - | |
| III | 0.80 | 0.42, 1.54 | 0.504 | |
| II | 0.12 | 0.01, 1.00 | 0.050 | |
| Ascites | ||||
| None | 1.00 | - | - | |
| 0–1,000 | 0.63 | 0.27, 1.50 | 0.301 | |
| >1,000 | 1.17 | 0.59, 2.30 | 0.652 | |
| Unknown | 0.89 | 0.34, 2.33 | 0.815 | |
| Extensive surgery | ||||
| No | 1.00 | - | - | |
| Yes | 0.88 | 0.51, 1.52 | 0.655 | |
| Surgery outcome | ||||
| Inadequate | 1.00 | - | - | |
| Optimal | 0.72 | 0.40, 1.30 | 0.281 | |
| Complete | 0.47 | 0.21, 1.05 | 0.066 | |
Crude and age-adjusted values of HR (95% CI) for perioperative decline in CA125 were 0.91 (0.78, 1.06) and 0.82 (0.66, 1.02), respectively; All analyses were conducted within hospital strata to account for the clustering of patients within hospitals (n=3).
HR, hazard ratio (vs. referent category as indicated by HR=1.00); CI, confidence interval; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.