Literature DB >> 27670259

Surgical manual of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group: classification of hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy.

Maria Lee1, Chel Hun Choi2, Yi Kyeong Chun3, Yun Hwan Kim4, Kwang Beom Lee5, Shin Wha Lee6, Seung Hyuk Shim7, Yong Jung Song8, Ju Won Roh9, Suk Joon Chang10, Jong Min Lee11.   

Abstract

The Surgery Treatment Modality Committee of the Korean Gynecologic Oncologic Group (KGOG) has determined to develop a surgical manual to facilitate clinical trials and to improve communication between investigators by standardizing and precisely describing operating procedures. The literature on anatomic terminology, identification of surgical components, and surgical techniques were reviewed and discussed in depth to develop a surgical manual for gynecologic oncology. The surgical procedures provided here represent the minimum requirements for participating in a clinical trial. These procedures should be described in the operation record form, and the pathologic findings obtained from the procedures should be recorded in the pathologic report form. Here, we focused on radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy, and we developed a KGOG classification for those conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Hysterectomy, Lymph Node Excision; Manuals as Topic

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27670259      PMCID: PMC5165073          DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 2005-0380            Impact factor:   4.401


INTRODUCTION

To date, no surgical manual or standardized anatomical description of gynecologic oncology has been developed by the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG). The members of the Surgery Treatment Modality Committee (Surgery TMC) of the KGOG identified a need for a surgical manual to facilitate clinical trials and to improve communication between investigators by standardizing and precisely describing operating procedures. We reviewed the current literature on anatomic terminology, identification of surgical components, and surgical techniques, and discussed them in depth in order to create a surgical manual for gynecologic oncology. Here, we focused on radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy, and we developed a KGOG classification for those conditions.

ANATOMICAL NOMENCLATURE

To simplify the anatomical terms for classification, we will consistently use the terminology ‘paracervix,’ ‘vesicouterine ligament,’ and ‘uterosacral ligament’ for the structures usually referred to by surgeons as the cardinal ligament (or lateral parametrium), anterior parametrium, and posterior parametrium, respectively [1]. The term ‘paracervix’ (cardinal ligament, Mackenrodt’s ligament, or parametrium) refers to the dorsolateral attachment of the cervix, tissues that surround the uterine artery between the uterine corpus and pelvic sidewall cranial to the ureter, connective tissue, and lymph channels. The term ‘vesicouterine ligament’ (ventral parametrium) includes the anterior and posterior leaflets. The connective tissue of the anterior leaflet of the vesicouterine ligament; that is, the anterior portion of the so-called ureteral tunnel, can be identified following the complete separation of the uterine artery and superficial uterine vein from the ureter. The posterior leaflet of the vesicouterine ligament is the tissue that resides under the ureter and connects the posterior wall of the bladder and the lateral cervix/upper lateral vagina [2]. The term ‘uterosacral ligament’ (dorsal parametrium) refers to the fibrous tissue and non-striated muscular fibres that are attached to the front of the sacrum and travel from the uterus to the anterior aspect of the sacrum. Throughout this classification, the term ‘nerve preservation’ refers to identify the hypogastric nerves, the inferior hypogastric nerve plexus (pelvic plexus), and its bladder branches, and indicates allowing the resection of oncologically relevant pericervical structures while preserving the sympathetic and parasympathetic innervations of the pelvic organs [3].

KGOG CLASSIFICATION OF HYSTERECTOMY

The Piver-Rutlege-Smith classification published in 1974 has achieved popularity [45]. However, several limitations, including inconsistencies in terminology, drawbacks associated with a uterocentric concept, exclusion of nerve-sparing and fertility-preserving techniques, and difficulties adapting the guidelines to advances in vaginal, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery, makes continued use of the classification challenging. To overcome these limitations, Querleu and Morrow [1] proposed a new classification consisting of four types of radical hysterectomy, the Kyoto classification. We decided to create a KGOG classification of hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy based on the Kyoto classification, because it is considered contemporary and adequate for worldwide communication. The classification has been modified and adapted to Korean circumstances by the Surgery TMC of the KGOG. There are two major changes. One is the deletion of the type B subclassification (B1 and B2), and the other is the inclusion of a fertility-preserving procedure, trachelectomy (cervicectomy), as a subclassification of types C and D. The reasons for the elimination of the type B subclassification are as follows: (1) It is not easy and is sometimes impossible to differentiate the paracervical lymph nodes from the pelvic lymph nodes. (2) The basic reason for developing this classification is to provide separate descriptions of hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy. (3) Separate clinical indications for each operation have not been identified. (4) The clinical significance of the differentiation within type B is considered minimal. Table 1 summarises the four types of KGOG classification of hysterectomy.
Table 1

Korean Gynecologic Oncologic Group classification of hysterectomy*

Extent of resectionUreter
A: Minimum resection of the paracervixParacervix: transected medial to the ureter but lateral to the cervixPalpation or direct visualization without freeing from its bed
Uterosacral and vesicouterine ligaments: transected closely to the uterus
Vaginal resection: generally less than 10 mm, without removal of the paracervix
A (T)Simple trachelectomy (cervicectomy)
Surgical removal of the uterine cervix without removal of the paracervix or vagina, very large conization
B: Transection of paracervix at the ureter§Paracervix: transected at the level of the ureteral tunnelUnroofed and rolled laterally
Uterosacral and vesicouterine ligaments: partial resection
Neural component of the paracervix: no resection
Vaginal resection: at least 10 mm of the vagina from the cervix or tumor
B (T)Radical trachelectomy (cervicectomy)
Surgical removal of the uterine cervix with the paracervix and vagina
C: Transection of the paracervix at its junction with the internal iliac vascular systemTransection of the uterosacral ligaments at the rectumCompletely mobilized
Transection of the vesicouterine ligaments at the bladder
Resection: 15–20 mm of the vagina from the tumor or cervix and corresponding paracervix
C1With autonomic nerve sparing/preservation
C2Without autonomic nerve sparing/preservation
D: Entire resection of paracervix with vesselsUltra-radical procedures, mostly indicated at the time of pelvic exenterationCompletely mobilized
D1Resection of the paracervix at the pelvic side, with vessels arising from the internal iliac system, exposing the roots of the sciatic nerve
D2Resection of the paracervix at the pelvic side, with the internal iliac vessels plus the adjacent fascial or muscular structures

*Modification of the new classification of radical hysterectomy by Querleu et al. [1]. †It is similar to type I of the “Piver-Rutledge-Smith (PRS) classification” [45]. ‡(T) means trachelectomy (cervicectomy). §This is similar to type II under the PRS classification. ǁThis is similar to type III under the PRS classification.

*Modification of the new classification of radical hysterectomy by Querleu et al. [1]. †It is similar to type I of the “Piver-Rutledge-Smith (PRS) classification” [45]. ‡(T) means trachelectomy (cervicectomy). §This is similar to type II under the PRS classification. ǁThis is similar to type III under the PRS classification.

1. Type A: minimum resection of the paracervix

This is an extrafascial hysterectomy. The paracervix is transected medial to the ureter and lateral to the cervix. The ureter does not need to be unroofed. The uterosacral and vesicouterine ligaments are transected close to the uterus. The length of the vaginal resection is generally less than 10 mm, and the vaginal part of the paracervix is not removed.

2. Type B: transection of the paracervix at the ureter

Partial resection of the uterosacral and vesicouterine ligaments is the key element of this category. The ureter is unroofed and rolled laterally, permitting transection of the paracervix at the level of the ureteral tunnel. The neural component of the paracervix caudal to the deep uterine vein is not resected. At least 10 mm of the vagina from the cervix or tumor is resected.

3. Type C: transection of the paracervix at the junction with the internal iliac vascular system

Following complete mobilization of the ureter, transection of the uterosacral ligament at the rectum and transection of the vesicouterine ligament at the bladder are characteristics of type C. In addition, 15 to 20 mm of the vagina from the tumor or cervix and the corresponding paracolpos is resected, depending on the extent of vaginal and paracervical involvement and the surgeon’s preference. Type C is divided into two types: C1, with autonomic nerve preservation; C2, without autonomic nerve preservation. In type C1, the uterosacral ligament is transected after separation of the hypogastric nerves. The bladder branches of the pelvic plexus are preserved in the lateral ligament of the bladder (i.e., the lateral part of the bladder pillar). If the caudal part of the paracervix is transected, careful identification of bladder nerves is subsequently required. In type C2, the paracervix is transected completely, including the part caudal to the deep uterine vein.

4. Type D: entire resection of paracervix with vessels

This rare type of surgery is characterised by additional ultraradical procedures, primarily indicated at the time of pelvic exenteration. In this type of surgery, the entire paracervix is resected. Type D is divided into two types: D1, resection of the entire paracervix along with the internal iliac vessels; D2, resection of the entire paracervix, with the internal iliac vessels and adjacent fascial or muscular structures. Type D1 is a resection of the entire paracervix at the pelvic sidewall along with the internal iliac vessels, exposing the roots of the sciatic nerve. The procedure involves a total resection of the vessels of the lateral part of the paracervix. These vessels (i.e., inferior gluteal, internal pudendal, and obturator vessels) arise from the internal iliac vessel system. Type D2 is the same as D1 plus resection of the entire paracervix with the internal iliac vessels and adjacent fascial or muscular structures (i.e., pubococcygeus, iliococcygeus, coccygeus, and obturator muscles).

LYMPHADENECTOMY

We classified lymphadenectomy by its level and radicality. Anatomically, arteries are the most stable landmarks for lymphadenectomy. Four areas or levels are defined according to the corresponding arterial anatomy: (1) level 1, external and internal iliac (including obturator), (2) level 2, common iliac (including presacral), (3) level 3, para-aortic infra-inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), and (4) level 4, para-aortic infrarenal. If other lymph nodes are resected, specification of the procedure is necessary. Although lymph nodes can cross borders, the limits between levels 1 and 2, levels 2 and 3, and levels 3 and 4 are the bifurcation of the common iliac artery, the bifurcation of the aorta, and the IMA, respectively. We also defined types of lymphadenectomy by radicality, lymph node sampling (LNS), systematic lymph node dissection (LND), and debulking. LNS is defined as sampling of a sentinel node, suspicious nodes, or random sampling [6]. In a systematic pelvic LND (PLND), all lymph nodes and fatty tissues between the external and internal iliac arteries, from the bifurcation of the common iliac artery up to the circumflex vein and above the obturator nerve, are removed. A systematic para-aortic LND includes resection of all lymph nodes and fatty tissue surrounding the aorta, inferior vena cava, and renal vessels from the renal vein cranially to the midpoint of the common iliac vessels caudally, and extending laterally to the edge of the psoas major muscle. The range of the minimum number of lymph nodes for an adequate systematic PLND has been previously found to be 10 to 25 [67891011]. The number of LNs required can be modified according to the characteristics of a clinical trial. Debulking of lymph nodes is defined as resection of bulky nodes [912].

OPERATION RECORD FORM

An operation record form (ORF) for cervical cancer has been established on the basis of the Synoptic Operative Template for Ovarian Cancer of the National Cancer Center of Korea. A standardized ORF will encourage keeping of full and accurate records with all required information and surgical procedures for clinical trials on cervical cancer. The ORF for cervical cancer includes the following information (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Operation record form for cervical cancer. CA-125, cancer antigen 125; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; CIS, cervical carcinoma in situ; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; IMA, inferior mesenteric artery; KGOG, Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group; LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; LLETZ, large loop excision of the transformation zone; LLQ, left lower quadrant; LN, lymph node; LND, lymph node dissection; LNS, lymph node sampling; Lt, left; LUQ, left upper quadrant; Plt conc, platelet concentration; p-RBC, packed-red blood cell; RLQ, right lower quadrant; Rt, right; RUQ, right upper quadrant; SCC-Ag, squamous cell carcinoma antigen; WB, whole blood.

Operation record form for cervical cancer. CA-125, cancer antigen 125; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; CIS, cervical carcinoma in situ; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; IMA, inferior mesenteric artery; KGOG, Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group; LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; LLETZ, large loop excision of the transformation zone; LLQ, left lower quadrant; LN, lymph node; LND, lymph node dissection; LNS, lymph node sampling; Lt, left; LUQ, left upper quadrant; Plt conc, platelet concentration; p-RBC, packed-red blood cell; RLQ, right lower quadrant; Rt, right; RUQ, right upper quadrant; SCC-Ag, squamous cell carcinoma antigen; WB, whole blood.

PATHOLOGIC REPORT FORM

The surgery TMC of the KGOG, in conjunction with the Gynecological Pathology Study Group, reviewed and analyzed several pathologic report forms (PRFs) for cervical cancer from domestic and international institutes. Finally, two kinds of PRF for cervical cancer were developed; one is for excision, and the other is for trachelectomy, hysterectomy, and pelvic exenteration. PRFs for cervical cancer include the following information (Figs. 2, 3, Supplementary Figs. 2, 3).
Fig. 2

Pathologic report form for cervical cancer managed by local excision. AIS, adenocarcinoma in situ; HSIL, high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; LSIL, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.

Fig. 3

Pathologic report form for cervical cancer managed by trachelectomy, hysterectomy, or pelvic exenteration. AIS, adenocarcinoma in situ; HSIL, high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; LSIL, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.

Pathologic report form for cervical cancer managed by local excision. AIS, adenocarcinoma in situ; HSIL, high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; LSIL, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Pathologic report form for cervical cancer managed by trachelectomy, hysterectomy, or pelvic exenteration. AIS, adenocarcinoma in situ; HSIL, high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; LSIL, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

The purpose of this surgical manual is to facilitate future clinical trials and to improve communication between investigators by standardizing and describing operative procedures. The surgical procedures provided here represent the minimum requirements for participating in a clinical trial. These procedures should be systematically and properly described in the ORF, and the pathologic findings obtained from the procedures should be recorded in the PRF. This manual will be updated as necessary to include various clinical trials and to reflect the latest trends.
  12 in total

1.  Precise anatomy of the vesico-uterine ligament for radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Shingo Fujii; Kenji Takakura; Noriomi Matsumura; Toshihiro Higuchi; Shigeo Yura; Masaki Mandai; Tsukasa Baba
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Classification of radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Denis Querleu; C Paul Morrow
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  The twenty-first century role of Piver-Rutledge type III radical hysterectomy and FIGO stage IA, IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer in the era of robotic surgery: a personal perspective.

Authors:  M Steven Piver; Ali Ghomi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.401

4.  Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer.

Authors:  M S Piver; F Rutledge; J P Smith
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Anatomical study of para-aortic and pelvic lymph nodes in gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  P B Panici; G Scambia; G Baiocchi; G Matonti; A Capelli; S Mancuso
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Angelo Maggioni; Neville Hacker; Fabio Landoni; Sven Ackermann; Elio Campagnutta; Karl Tamussino; Raimund Winter; Antonio Pellegrino; Stefano Greggi; Roberto Angioli; Natalina Manci; Giovanni Scambia; Tiziana Dell'Anna; Roldano Fossati; Irene Floriani; Rita S Rossi; Roberto Grassi; Giuseppe Favalli; Francesco Raspagliesi; Diana Giannarelli; Luca Martella; Costantino Mangioni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Resection of bulky positive lymph nodes in patients with cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  N.F. Hacker; G.V. Wain; J.L. Nicklin
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.437

8.  Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Stefano Basile; Francesco Maneschi; Andrea Alberto Lissoni; Mauro Signorelli; Giovanni Scambia; Roberto Angioli; Saverio Tateo; Giorgia Mangili; Dionyssios Katsaros; Gaetano Garozzo; Elio Campagnutta; Nicoletta Donadello; Stefano Greggi; Mauro Melpignano; Francesco Raspagliesi; Nicola Ragni; Gennaro Cormio; Roberto Grassi; Massimo Franchi; Diana Giannarelli; Roldano Fossati; Valter Torri; Mariangela Amoroso; Clara Crocè; Costantino Mangioni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Randomised study of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer macroscopically confined to the pelvis.

Authors:  A Maggioni; P Benedetti Panici; T Dell'Anna; F Landoni; A Lissoni; A Pellegrino; R S Rossi; S Chiari; E Campagnutta; S Greggi; R Angioli; N Manci; M Calcagno; G Scambia; R Fossati; I Floriani; V Torri; R Grassi; C Mangioni
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ju Won Roh; Dong Ock Lee; Dong Hoon Suh; Myong Cheol Lim; Sang Soo Seo; Jinsoo Chung; Sun Lee; Sang Yoon Park
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.401

View more
  6 in total

1.  Suprarenal lymphadenectomy with nephrectomy for refractory ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Soo Jin Park; Hee Seung Kim
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-03

2.  Evaluation of the distance from the anterior cervicovaginal junction to the anterior peritoneal reflection for anterior colpotomy during vaginal hysterectomy in Korean women.

Authors:  Ji Hye Lee; Su Hyun Chae; A Jin Lee; Yoon Jung Min; Kyeong A So; Sun Joo Lee; Tae Jin Kim; Seung-Hyuk Shim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  A retrospective comparison of outcome in IB2 and IIA cervical cancer patients treated with primary concurrent chemoradiation versus radical hysterectomy with or without tailored adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Tae-Kyu Jang; So-Jin Shin; Hyewon Chung; Sang-Hoon Kwon; Soon-Do Cha; Eunbi Lee; Changmin Shin; Chi-Heum Cho
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2017-10-17

4.  Comparison of Laparoscopy and Laparotomy for Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Women With Presumed Stage I-II High-Risk Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  E Sun Paik; Seung Hun Baek; Jun Hyeok Kang; Soo Young Jeong; Myeong Seon Kim; Woo Young Kim; Yoo-Young Lee; Chel Hun Choi; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae; Tae-Joong Kim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Informed consent forms for gynecologic cancer surgery: recommendations from the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology.

Authors:  Ha Kyun Chang; Seung-Hyuk Shim; Maria Lee; Won Moo Lee; Kyung Jin Eoh; Heon Jong Yoo; Mi Kyung Kim; Min Kyu Kim; Kwang-Beom Lee; Kyeong A So; Young Tae Kim; Dae Woo Lee; Doo-Yoon Hyun; Jong-Min Lee
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Informed consent forms for gynecologic cancer surgery: recommendations from the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology.

Authors:  Ha Kyun Chang; Seung-Hyuk Shim; Maria Lee; Won Moo Lee; Kyung Jin Eoh; Heon Jong Yoo; Mi Kyung Kim; Min Kyu Kim; Kwang-Beom Lee; Kyeong A So; Young Tae Kim; Dae Woo Lee; Doo-Yoon Hyun; Jong-Min Lee
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2022-03-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.