| Literature DB >> 27669227 |
Adriana Ferreira Souza1,2, Dayana M Rodriguez3,4, Daylin R Ribeaux5,6, Marcos A C Luna7,8, Thayse A Lima E Silva9,10, Rosileide F Silva Andrade11,12, Norma B Gusmão13, Galba M Campos-Takaki14.
Abstract
Almost all oleaginous microorganisms are available for biodiesel production, and for the mechanism of oil accumulation, which is what makes a microbial approach economically competitive. This study investigated the potential that the yeast Candida lipolytica UCP0988, in an anamorphous state, has to produce simultaneously a bioemulsifier and to accumulate lipids using inexpensive and alternative substrates. Cultivation was carried out using waste soybean oil and corn steep liquor in accordance with 2² experimental designs with 1% inoculums (10⁷ cells/mL). The bioemulsifier was produced in the cell-free metabolic liquid in the late exponential phase (96 h), at Assay 4 (corn steep liquor 5% and waste soybean oil 8%), with 6.704 UEA, IE24 of 96.66%, and showed an anionic profile. The emulsion formed consisted of compact small and stable droplets (size 0.2-5 µm), stable at all temperatures, at pH 2 and 4, and 2% salinity, and showed an ability to remove 93.74% of diesel oil from sand. The displacement oil (ODA) showed 45.34 cm² of dispersion (central point of the factorial design). The biomass obtained from Assay 4 was able to accumulate lipids of 0.425 g/g biomass (corresponding to 42.5%), which consisted of Palmitic acid (28.4%), Stearic acid (7.7%), Oleic acid (42.8%), Linoleic acid (19.0%), and γ-Linolenic acid (2.1%). The results showed the ability of C. lipopytica to produce both bioemulsifier and biodiesel using the metabolic conversion of waste soybean oil and corn steep liquor, which are economic renewable sources.Entities:
Keywords: Candida lipolytica; agro-industrial waste; bioemulsifier; biofuel; lipids; renewable sources
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27669227 PMCID: PMC5085641 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17101608
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Bioemulsifier production by C. lipolytica using factorial design.
| Assays | Emulsification Index (%) | Emulsification Activity (UEA) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burned Engine Oil | Corn Oil | |||
| 1 | 64.00 | Negative | 35.00 | 0.945 |
| 2 | 91.40 | 14.70 | 50.00 | 5.693 |
| 3 | 93.33 | 60.00 | 55.00 | 6.281 |
| 4 | 96.66 | 63.63 | 58.00 | 6.704 |
| 5 | 66.66 | Negative | 50.00 | 4.233 |
| 6 | 70.96 | Negative | 47.00 | 4.335 |
| 7 | 72.85 | Negative | 50.00 | 4.370 |
| 8 | 74.28 | Negative | 50.00 | 4.379 |
Independent variables : (−1): corn steep liquor 1% (v/v) and 2% (v/v) of waste soybean oil; Central point (0): 3% (v/v) corn steep liquor and 5% (v/v) of waste soybean oil; (+1): 5% (v/v) corn steep liquor and 8% (v/v) of waste soybean oil.
Figure 1Pareto chart for 22 factorial design of culture after 96 h, where (1) corn steep liquor and (2) waste soybean oil are the independent variables and emulsifying activity is the response variable. The point at which the effect estimates were statistically significant is shown.
Figure 2Comparison with the microstructural characteristics of the emulsions droplets formed from bioemulsifier produced by C. lipolytica UCP 0988, Assay 4 of the factorial design 22 (5% (v/v) corn steep liquor and 8% (v/v) waste soybean oil) using light microscopy: (A) liquid without inoculum; (B) culture at 24 h; (C) culture at 48 h; (D) culture at 72 h; (E) culture at 96 h; and (F) Control (Sodium dodecyl sulfate-SDS).
Evaluation of the bioemulsifier produced by Candida lipolytica properties regarding droplet size, Emulsification index (E24), Units of Emulsification Activity (UEA) and characterization of emulsification *.
| Time of Growth (h) | Droplet Size Measurement (µm) | Emulsification Index (E24 (%)) | Units of Emulsification Activity (UEA) | Emulsification Properties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1–30 | Not formed | 0.018 | No emulsification. Drops without globular form and large size. Droplets unstable. | |
| 0.5–10 | 28.57 | 0.891 | Turbid with sedimentation, globular droplets and large flocculation. Droplets unstable. | |
| 0.3–10 | 47.06 | 5.648 | Homogeneous with smaller and large oil droplets. Droplets unstable. | |
| 0.1–10 | 76.47 | 5.812 | Droplets were homogeneous, smaller and stable. | |
| 0.1–5 | 96.66 | 6.101 | Droplets were homogeneous, compact, smaller and stable. | |
| 2.5–12 | 100 | 6.933 | Droplets were homogeneous, compact smaller and stable. |
* Assay 4 (5% (v/v) corn steep liquor and 8% (v/v) waste soybean oil).
Figure 3Emulsification index of bioemulsifier produced by Candida lipolytica UCP 0988 against burnt engine oil when NaCl concentrations, pH and temperature were varied.
Figure 4Dispersion of burnt engine oil in seawater by bioemulsifier produced by C. lipolytica UCP 0988 in accordance with the factorial design: (A) Assay 1; (B) Assay 2; (C) Assay 3; (D) Assay 4; (E) central point; (F) SDS; and (G) water.
Production of biomass and total lipids by Candida lipolytica using 22 factorial design.
| Assays | pH | Biomass (g/L) | Lipids (g/L Biomass) | Lipids (g/g Biomass) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | 1.96 | 0.696 | 0.355 | |
| 4.2 | 4.41 | 1.87 | 0.425 | |
| 4.1 | 10.02 | 3.15 | 0.314 | |
| 4.2 | 12.71 | 4.96 | 0.390 | |
| 4.1 | 6.71 | 2.17 | 0.323 | |
| 4.1 | 6.25 | 2.25 | 0.360 | |
| 4.2 | 6.73 | 2.47 | 0.367 | |
| 4.2 | 7.16 | 2.20 | 0.307 |
Independent variables : (−1): corn steep liquor 1% (v/v) and 2% (v/v) of waste soybean oil; Central point (0): 3% ( v/v) corn steep liquor and 5% (v/v) of waste soybean oil; (+1): 5% (v/v) corn steep liquor and 8% (v/v) of waste soybean oil.
Figure 5Cytochemistry staining of cells of Candida lipolytica UCP 0988 by Sudan Black method. Assay 4 of 22 factorial design: (A) 0 and (B) 24 h no lipid accumulation ; (C) 48 h and (D) 72 h low lipid accumulation; and (E) 96 h higher lipid accumulation.
Figure 6Pareto chart for 22 factorial design of culture of 96 h, where (1) corn steep liquor and (2) waste soybean oil are the independent variables and biomass is the response variable. The point at which the estimates of the effect were statistically significant (p = 0.05) is indicated by the dotted red vertical line.
Figure 7Pareto chart for 22 factorial design of culture of 96 h, where (1) corn steep liquor and (2) waste soybean oil are the independent variables and the total of lipids is the response variable. The point at which the effect estimates were statistically significant (p = 0.05) is indicated by the dotted red vertical line.
Fatty acid profile of total lipids from biomass of Candida lipolytica in Assay 4 after 96 h.
| Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (%) | |
|---|---|
| Capric acid (C10:0) | – |
| Myristic acid (C14:0) | – |
| Palmitic acid (C16:0) | 28.4 |
| Palmitoleic acid (C16:1) | – |
| Stearic acid (C18:0) | 7.7 |
| Oleic acid (C18:1) | 42.8 |
| Linoleic acid (C18:2) | 19.0 |
| α-Linolenic acid (C18:3–ω-3) | – |
| γ-Linolenic acid (C18:3–ω-6) | 2.1 |
| Arachidic acid (C20:0) | – |
| Gadoleic acid (C20:1) | – |
| Behenic acid (C22:0) | – |
Not detected: –.
Comparison of lipid production by yeasts using different substrates with Candida lipolytica UCP 0988 in this study.
| Microorganism | Carbon Source (Substrates) | Lipids (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Waste soybean oil (8%) | 42.5 | Present study | |
| Molasses at 8% | 59.9 | Karatay and Donmez [ | |
| Industrial glycerol at 50% | 43.0 | Papanikolaou and Aggelis [ | |
| Acetate (15.9%) | 73.4 | Gong et al. [ | |
| Crude glycerol 10% and Tween 20 at 1% | 35.2 | Saenge et al. [ | |
| Corn steep solids 2% and Yeast extract (0.1%) | 52.1 | Galafassi et al. [ | |
| Crude glycerol at 10% | 40.6 | Kitcha and Cheirsilp [ | |
| Glucose (40%) | 43.5 | Areesirisuk et al. [ |