Katherine G Elliston1, Stuart G Ferguson2, Natalie Schüz3, Benjamin Schüz1. 1. Division of Psychology, School of Medicine. 2. Division of Medicine and Pharmacy, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania. 3. School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Individual eating behavior is a risk factor for obesity and highly dependent on internal and external cues. Many studies also suggest that the food environment (i.e., food outlets) influences eating behavior. This study therefore examines the momentary food environment (at the time of eating) and the role of cues simultaneously in predicting everyday eating behavior in adults with overweight and obesity. METHOD: Intensive longitudinal study using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) over 14 days in 51 adults with overweight and obesity (average body mass index = 30.77; SD = 4.85) with a total of 745 participant days of data. Multiple daily assessments of eating (meals, high- or low-energy snacks) and randomly timed assessments. Cues and the momentary food environment were assessed during both assessment types. RESULTS: Random effects multinomial logistic regression shows that both internal (affect) and external (food availability, social situation, observing others eat) cues were associated with increased likelihood of eating. The momentary food environment predicted meals and snacking on top of cues, with a higher likelihood of high-energy snacks when fast food restaurants were close by (odds ratio [OR] = 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.22, 2.93) and a higher likelihood of low-energy snacks in proximity to supermarkets (OR = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.38, 3.82). CONCLUSIONS: Real-time eating behavior, both in terms of main meals and snacks, is associated with internal and external cues in adults with overweight and obesity. In addition, perceptions of the momentary food environment influence eating choices, emphasizing the importance of an integrated perspective on eating behavior and obesity prevention. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVES: Individual eating behavior is a risk factor for obesity and highly dependent on internal and external cues. Many studies also suggest that the food environment (i.e., food outlets) influences eating behavior. This study therefore examines the momentary food environment (at the time of eating) and the role of cues simultaneously in predicting everyday eating behavior in adults with overweight and obesity. METHOD: Intensive longitudinal study using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) over 14 days in 51 adults with overweight and obesity (average body mass index = 30.77; SD = 4.85) with a total of 745 participant days of data. Multiple daily assessments of eating (meals, high- or low-energy snacks) and randomly timed assessments. Cues and the momentary food environment were assessed during both assessment types. RESULTS: Random effects multinomial logistic regression shows that both internal (affect) and external (food availability, social situation, observing others eat) cues were associated with increased likelihood of eating. The momentary food environment predicted meals and snacking on top of cues, with a higher likelihood of high-energy snacks when fast food restaurants were close by (odds ratio [OR] = 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.22, 2.93) and a higher likelihood of low-energy snacks in proximity to supermarkets (OR = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.38, 3.82). CONCLUSIONS: Real-time eating behavior, both in terms of main meals and snacks, is associated with internal and external cues in adults with overweight and obesity. In addition, perceptions of the momentary food environment influence eating choices, emphasizing the importance of an integrated perspective on eating behavior and obesity prevention. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Andrea B Goldschmidt; Kathryn E Smith; Ross D Crosby; Hope K Boyd; Elizabeth Dougherty; Scott G Engel; Alissa Haedt-Matt Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Jenna R Cummings; Emma T Schiestl; A Janet Tomiyama; Tanvi Mamtora; Ashley N Gearhardt Journal: Appetite Date: 2021-12-13 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Preeti Dhuria; Wendy Lawrence; Sarah Crozier; Cyrus Cooper; Janis Baird; Christina Vogel Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-06-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Deborah R Wahl; Karoline Villinger; Laura M König; Katrin Ziesemer; Harald T Schupp; Britta Renner Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Susan M Schembre; Yue Liao; Sydney G O'Connor; Melanie D Hingle; Shu-En Shen; Katarina G Hamoy; Jimi Huh; Genevieve F Dunton; Rick Weiss; Cynthia A Thomson; Carol J Boushey Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 4.773