Literature DB >> 27667959

A bias in the "mass-normalized" DTT response - an effect of non-linear concentration-response curves for copper and manganese.

Jessica G Charrier1, Alexander S McFall1, Kennedy K-T Vu2, James Baroi2, Catalina Olea2, Alam Hasson2, Cort Anastasio1.   

Abstract

The dithiothreitol (DTT) assay is widely used to measure the oxidative potential of particulate matter. Results are typically presented in mass-normalized units (e.g., pmols DTT lost per minute per microgram PM) to allow for comparison among samples. Use of this unit assumes that the mass-normalized DTT response is constant and independent of the mass concentration of PM added to the DTT assay. However, based on previous work that identified non-linear DTT responses for copper and manganese, this basic assumption (that the mass-normalized DTT response is independent of the concentration of PM added to the assay) should not be true for samples where Cu and Mn contribute significantly to the DTT signal. To test this we measured the DTT response at multiple PM concentrations for eight ambient particulate samples collected at two locations in California. The results confirm that for samples with significant contributions from Cu and Mn, the mass-normalized DTT response can strongly depend on the concentration of PM added to the assay, varying by up to an order of magnitude for PM concentrations between 2 and 34 μg mL-1. This mass dependence confounds useful interpretation of DTT assay data in samples with significant contributions from Cu and Mn, requiring additional quality control steps to check for this bias. To minimize this problem, we discuss two methods to correct the mass-normalized DTT result and we apply those methods to our samples. We find that it is possible to correct the mass-normalized DTT result, although the correction methods have some drawbacks and add uncertainty to DTT analyses. More broadly, other DTT-active species might also have non-linear concentration-responses in the assay and cause a bias. In addition, the same problem of Cu- and Mn-mediated bias in mass-normalized DTT results might affect other measures of acellular redox activity in PM and needs to be addressed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dithiothreitol; copper; manganese; oxidative potential; particulate matter; quinones

Year:  2016        PMID: 27667959      PMCID: PMC5031483          DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)        ISSN: 1352-2310            Impact factor:   4.798


  26 in total

1.  Organic aerosols associated with the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by water-soluble PM2.5.

Authors:  Vishal Verma; Ting Fang; Lu Xu; Richard E Peltier; Armistead G Russell; Nga Lee Ng; Rodney J Weber
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Impacts of Antioxidants on Hydroxyl Radical Production from Individual and Mixed Transition Metals in a Surrogate Lung Fluid.

Authors:  Jessica G Charrier; Cort Anastasio
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Cytotoxic and proinflammatory effects of ambient and source-related particulate matter (PM) in relation to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cytokine adsorption by particles.

Authors:  Umme S Akhtar; Robert D McWhinney; Neeraj Rastogi; Jonathan P D Abbatt; Greg J Evans; Jeremy A Scott
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Microfluidic electrochemical sensor for on-line monitoring of aerosol oxidative activity.

Authors:  Yupaporn Sameenoi; Kirsten Koehler; Jeff Shapiro; Kanokporn Boonsong; Yele Sun; Jeffrey Collett; John Volckens; Charles S Henry
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Microfluidic paper-based analytical device for aerosol oxidative activity.

Authors:  Yupaporn Sameenoi; Pantila Panymeesamer; Natcha Supalakorn; Kirsten Koehler; Orawon Chailapakul; Charles S Henry; John Volckens
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Airway inflammation and oxidative potential of air pollutant particles in a pediatric asthma panel.

Authors:  Ralph J Delfino; Norbert Staimer; Thomas Tjoa; Daniel L Gillen; James J Schauer; Martin M Shafer
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.563

7.  On dithiothreitol (DTT) as a measure of oxidative potential for ambient particles: evidence for the importance of soluble transition metals.

Authors:  J G Charrier; C Anastasio
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 6.133

8.  Oxidative potential of semi-volatile and non volatile particulate matter (PM) from heavy-duty vehicles retrofitted with emission control technologies.

Authors:  Subhasis Biswas; Vishal Verma; James J Schauer; Flemming R Cassee; Arthur K Cho; Constantinos Sioutas
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  In vitro toxicity of particulate matter (PM) collected at different sites in the Netherlands is associated with PM composition, size fraction and oxidative potential--the RAPTES project.

Authors:  Maaike Steenhof; Ilse Gosens; Maciej Strak; Krystal J Godri; Gerard Hoek; Flemming R Cassee; Ian S Mudway; Frank J Kelly; Roy M Harrison; Erik Lebret; Bert Brunekreef; Nicole A H Janssen; Raymond H H Pieters
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 9.400

10.  Hydrogen peroxide formation in a surrogate lung fluid by transition metals and quinones present in particulate matter.

Authors:  Jessica G Charrier; Alexander S McFall; Nicole K Richards-Henderson; Cort Anastasio
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  5 in total

1.  Atmospheric conditions and composition that influence PM2.5 oxidative potential in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Steven J Campbell; Kate Wolfer; Battist Utinger; Joe Westwood; Zhi-Hui Zhang; Nicolas Bukowiecki; Sarah S Steimer; Tuan V Vu; Jingsha Xu; Nicholas Straw; Steven Thomson; Atallah Elzein; Yele Sun; Di Liu; Linjie Li; Pingqing Fu; Alastair C Lewis; Roy M Harrison; William J Bloss; Miranda Loh; Mark R Miller; Zongbo Shi; Markus Kalberer
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 6.133

2.  Electrochemical Dithiothreitol Assay for Large-Scale Particulate Matter Studies.

Authors:  Kathleen E Berg; Laurelle R Turner; Megan L Benka-Coker; Sarah Rajkumar; Bonnie N Young; Jennifer L Peel; Maggie L Clark; John Volckens; Charles S Henry
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.908

3.  Personal Exposure to PM2.5 Black Carbon and Aerosol Oxidative Potential using an Automated Microenvironmental Aerosol Sampler (AMAS).

Authors:  Casey Quinn; Daniel D Miller-Lionberg; Kevin J Klunder; Jaymin Kwon; Elizabeth M Noth; John Mehaffy; David Leith; Sheryl Magzamen; S Katharine Hammond; Charles S Henry; John Volckens
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Synergistic and Antagonistic Effects of Aerosol Components on Its Oxidative Potential as Predictor of Particle Toxicity.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Pietrogrande; Luisa Romanato; Mara Russo
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-04-16

5.  Seasonal and Spatial Variations of PM10 and PM2.5 Oxidative Potential in Five Urban and Rural Sites across Lombardia Region, Italy.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Pietrogrande; Giorgia Demaria; Cristina Colombi; Eleonora Cuccia; Umberto Dal Santo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.