Literature DB >> 27667836

The Effect of Prerequisite Pharmacodynamics Course Timing on Student Performance in Pharmacotherapy Courses.

Michael P Kelsch1, Robert K Sylvester1.   

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the impact that decreasing the time from 12 to three months between prerequisite pharmacodynamics courses and their corresponding pharmacotherapy courses had on overall student performance in the pharmacotherapy courses measured by course examination scores. Methods. Two cohorts of second-professional year (P2) and third professional year (P3) classes, respectively, following different curriculum plans, simultaneously took two pharmacotherapy courses (infectious disease and neoplastic disease). Admission data (age, gender, prior bachelor's degree status, grade point average (GPA), Pharmacy College Admission Test (PCAT) score, and interview score) were collected to establish baseline characteristics between the two cohorts. Examination scores in the corresponding prerequisite pharmacodynamics and pharmacotherapy courses were also collected. The variable was the difference in time each cohort experienced between the prerequisite pharmacodynamics courses and the subsequent pharmacotherapy courses. Results. No difference was found in baseline admission characteristics between the two cohorts, except for increased average age, which favored the P2 cohort. In the infectious disease pharmacotherapy course, the P3 cohort performed better than the P2 cohort as measured by average examination scores. In the neoplastic disease pharmacotherapy course, the P3 cohort also achieved significant higher average examination scores than the P2 cohort. The P3 cohort achieved higher overall scores than the P2 cohort in both courses despite a longer interval between the applicable pharmacodynamic and pharmacotherapy courses (12 months vs 3 months, respectively). Conclusion. Shortening the time interval from 12 months to three months between prerequisite and requisite courses did not result in improved, or even equivalent, academic performance relative to the P2 cohort that had only a 3-month interval between courses. Placing like content closer together, as the only intervention, is not enough to ensure improved student performance measured by examination scores in corresponding requisite courses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  course timing; curricular design; curriculum

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27667836      PMCID: PMC5023991          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe80699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of an interview process for admission into a school of pharmacy.

Authors:  Michael P Kelsch; Daniel L Friesner
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  The relevance of prior knowledge in learning and instructional design.

Authors:  Telle Hailikari; Nina Katajavuori; Sari Lindblom-Ylanne
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Integrating science and practice in pharmacy curricula.

Authors:  Andrew K Husband; Adam Todd; John Fulton
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Problem-based learning: rationale and description.

Authors:  H G Schmidt
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 6.251

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of a prerequisite course of histology implementation for Chinese students of eight-year medical programme: a mixed quantitative survey.

Authors:  Yan Ruan; Junlei Zhang; Qiyan Cai; Jiali Wang; Gaoke Liu; Yunlai Liu; Feng Mei; Jianqin Niu; Lan Xiao; Yanping Tian; Hongli Li
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.263

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.