Literature DB >> 27667831

Debating the Effectiveness and Necessity of Tenure in Pharmacy Education.

Scott Asbill1, Aisha Morris Moultry2, Anne Policastri3, Carrie A Sincak4, Lisa S Smith5, Timothy R Ulbrich6.   

Abstract

Academic tenure is a controversial and highly debated topic. Is tenure truly outdated or does it simply need to be reformed? On one hand, the tenure system has shortcomings including deincentivizing productive faculty members, inconsistent application of tenure policies and procedures, and the potential for discrimination during tenure decisions. On the other hand, the tenure system is a long held tradition in the academy, essential in higher education to ensure academic standards and values are upheld in the best interest of students. It provides faculty members with the academic freedom to try innovative teaching strategies and conduct research and assists with faculty retention and recruitment. Regardless of one's opinion, the tenure debate is not going away and warrants further discussion. This paper represents the work of a group of academic leaders participating in the 2014-2015 AACP Academic Leadership Fellowship Program. This work was presented as a debate at the 2015 AACP Interim Meeting in Austin, TX in February 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  debate; pharmacy education; promotion; tenure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27667831      PMCID: PMC5023986          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe80694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  9 in total

1.  How a faculty group's peer mentoring of each other's scholarship can enhance retention and recruitment.

Authors:  Kathleen T Heinrich; Melinda G Oberleitner
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Scholarly activities of the most productive CLS faculty and schools in the U.S.A.

Authors:  Kathy V Waller; Karen R Karni
Journal:  Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2010

3.  Is tenure justified? An experimental study of faculty beliefs about tenure, promotion, and academic freedom.

Authors:  Stephen J Ceci; Wendy M Williams; Katrin Mueller-Johnson
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  Post-tenure review at the University Of Louisville School Of Medicine: a faculty development and revitalization tool.

Authors:  Laura Schweitzer; Tracy D Eells
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Knowledge and perceptions of tenure guidelines and criteria among allied health faculty: case study.

Authors:  Marnie L Epple Calvert; Courtney A Vaughn; Carole A Sullivan; Gregg Garn
Journal:  J Allied Health       Date:  2007

6.  Faculty appointment and tenure policies in medical schools: a 1997 status report.

Authors:  R F Jones; J S Gold
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Report of the 2011-2012 Academic Affairs Standing Committee: the evolving role of scholarly teaching in teaching excellence for current and future faculty.

Authors:  Melissa S Medina; Alicia S Bouldin; Michael Gonyeau; Julie C Kissack; Wanda T Maldonado; Russell B Melchert; Oussayma Moukhachen; Cecilia M Plaza
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Essential elements for a pharmacy practice mentoring program.

Authors:  Anne H Metzger; Yolanda M Hardy; Courtney Jarvis; Steven C Stoner; Matthew Pitlick; Michelle L Hilaire; Scott Hanes; Jack Burke; Nicole M Lodise
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Perceptions of tenure and tenure reform in academic pharmacy.

Authors:  Jill A Pfeiffenberger; Denise H Rhoney; Stephen J Cutler; Marcos A Oliveira; Karen L Whalen; Rajan Radhakrishnan; Ronald P Jordan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.047

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.