Literature DB >> 27664963

Where does TMS Stimulate the Motor Cortex? Combining Electrophysiological Measurements and Realistic Field Estimates to Reveal the Affected Cortex Position.

Andreas Bungert1, André Antunes1, Svenja Espenhahn1,2, Axel Thielscher3,1,4.   

Abstract

Much of our knowledge on the physiological mechanisms of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) stems from studies which targeted the human motor cortex. However, it is still unclear which part of the motor cortex is predominantly affected by TMS. Considering that the motor cortex consists of functionally and histologically distinct subareas, this also renders the hypotheses on the physiological TMS effects uncertain. We use the finite element method (FEM) and magnetic resonance image-based individual head models to get realistic estimates of the electric field induced by TMS. The field changes in different subparts of the motor cortex are compared with electrophysiological threshold changes of 2 hand muscles when systematically varying the coil orientation in measurements. We demonstrate that TMS stimulates the region around the gyral crown and that the maximal electric field strength in this region is significantly related to the electrophysiological response. Our study is one of the most extensive comparisons between FEM-based field calculations and physiological TMS effects so far, being based on data for 2 hand muscles in 9 subjects. The results help to improve our understanding of the basic mechanisms of TMS. They also pave the way for a systematic exploration of realistic field estimates for dosage control in TMS.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  field calculations; finite element method; motor cortex; spatial targeting; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27664963     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  26 in total

1.  Simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation in head model with morphologically-realistic cortical neurons.

Authors:  Aman S Aberra; Boshuo Wang; Warren M Grill; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Design of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils with optimal trade-off between depth, focality, and energy.

Authors:  Luis J Gomez; Stefan M Goetz; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Structural and functional motor cortex asymmetry in unilateral lower limb amputation with phantom limb pain.

Authors:  K Pacheco-Barrios; C B Pinto; F G Saleh Velez; D Duarte; M E Gunduz; M Simis; A C Lepesteur Gianlorenco; J L Barouh; D Crandell; M Guidetti; L Battistella; F Fregni
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Conditions for numerically accurate TMS electric field simulation.

Authors:  Luis J Gomez; Moritz Dannhauer; Lari M Koponen; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Phase Synchronicity of μ-Rhythm Determines Efficacy of Interhemispheric Communication Between Human Motor Cortices.

Authors:  Maria-Ioanna Stefanou; Debora Desideri; Paolo Belardinelli; Christoph Zrenner; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Impact of non-brain anatomy and coil orientation on inter- and intra-subject variability in TMS at midline.

Authors:  Erik G Lee; Priyam Rastogi; Ravi L Hadimani; David C Jiles; Joan A Camprodon
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Understanding intracortical excitability in phantom limb pain: A multivariate analysis from a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Paulo E P Teixeira; Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Muhammed Enes Gunduz; Anna Carolyna Gianlorenço; Luis Castelo-Branco; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.734

Review 8.  Precise Modulation Strategies for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Advances and Future Directions.

Authors:  Gangliang Zhong; Zhengyi Yang; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 5.203

9.  Multi-scale modeling toolbox for single neuron and subcellular activity under Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Sina Shirinpour; Nicholas Hananeia; James Rosado; Harry Tran; Christos Galanis; Andreas Vlachos; Peter Jedlicka; Gillian Queisser; Alexander Opitz
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Lifting the veil on the dynamics of neuronal activities evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Bingshuo Li; Juha P Virtanen; Axel Oeltermann; Cornelius Schwarz; Martin A Giese; Ulf Ziemann; Alia Benali
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.