| Literature DB >> 27663794 |
Jian Yu1, Di-Sha Zou2, Meng-Ting Xie2, Yao Ye2, Tian-Peng Zheng1, Su-Xian Zhou1, Li-Li Huang1, Xiao-Ling Liu1, Jing-Qiong Xun1, Yan Zhou3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of hypertension in adults is increasing each year and has become a main public health issue worldwide. We must consider the impact of both individual factors and interactions among these factors on hypertension in adults. This study was designed to elucidate the clinical and metabolic characteristics of the prevalence of hypertension in adults and to explore the risk factors and interactions among these factors in adults with hypertension.Entities:
Keywords: Hypertension in adults; Interaction; Risk factor
Year: 2016 PMID: 27663794 PMCID: PMC5035478 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-016-0358-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
The clinical and metabolic characteristics of two groups
| Variables | Cases | Controls |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 1623 | 5037 | - | - |
| Age (years) | 57.70 ± 11.32 | 44.97 ± 12.53 | 36.410 | 0.000 |
| Sex (male/female) | 940/683 | 2540/2497 | 27.605 | 0.000 |
| NAFLD (%) | 31.10 | 15.30 | 197.863 | 0.000 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 150.17 ± 13.83 | 118.77 ± 12.18 | 87.299 | 0.000 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 91.45 ± 9.47 | 73.86 ± 8.78 | 68.837 | 0.000 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.52 ± 2.96 | 23.71 ± 3.09 | 20.773 | 0.000 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 5.84 ± 1.22 | 5.38 ± 0.91 | 16.332 | 0.000 |
| 2hPG (mmol/L) | 7.15 ± 1.40 | 7.08 ± 1.96 | 1.531 | 0.126 |
| UA (μmol/L) | 351.31 ± 87.18 | 318.60 ± 84.52 | 13.456 | 0.000 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.93 ± 1.38 | 1.47 ± 1.10 | 13.613 | 0.000 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.18 ± 0.89 | 4.86 ± 0.87 | 12.954 | 0.000 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.47 ± 0.85 | 3.11 ± 0.85 | 14.793 | 0.000 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.38 ± 0.37 | 1.46 ± 0.40 | −7.078 | 0.000 |
Variables are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD), number (n) or percentage (%). The cases were referring to the adult hypertensive patients, and the controls were referring to the normotensives
Abbreviations: N number, NAFLD non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, BMI body mass index, FPG fasting plasma glucose, 2hPG 2-h plasma glucose, UA uric acid, TG triglyceride, TC total cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
a P-values compare clinical and metabolic characteristics between 1623 cases and 5037 controls, using either Independent-Samples t-test or χ -test
Fig. 1The classification tree model for hypertension in adults. Data are shown in the percentage (%) and number (n). Continuous variables were divided into categorical variables after the classification tree was grown and pruned based on the restriction of the minimum sample size of the root (100) and child (50) nodes. The figure showed only variables with close associations with hypertension in adults. Abbreviations: n, number; BMI, body mass index; UA, uric acid; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol
Fig. 2The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of CRT model for hypertension. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) value was 81.6 %, the optimal cut-off point of 0.2 marked with a sensitivity of 84.4 % and a specificity of 64.5 %
Cut-off criterion, sensitivity, specificity, AUC and Youden index of ROC curve for CRT model
| Parameters | ROC curve of CRT model |
|---|---|
| Cut-off criterion | 0.2 |
| Sensitivity % (95 % | 84.41 (82.6 ~ 86.1) |
| Specificity % (95 % | 64.54 (63.2 ~ 65.9) |
| AUC % (95 % | 81.6 (80.6 ~ 82.5)* |
| Youden index % | 48.95 |
Sensitivity, specificity, AUC and Youden index of ROC curve are shown as percentages (%), and numbers in parentheses are 95 % CI
Abbreviations: ROC receiver operating characteristic, CRT classification and regression tree, CI confidence interval, AUC area under the curve
* P < 0.01
Variables and assignments in non-conditional logistic regression model
| Variables | Assignments |
|---|---|
| Hypertension | No = 0; Yes = 1 |
| Age (years) | ≤47.5 = 0; > 47.5 = 1 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | ≤24.115 = 0; > 24.115 = 1 |
| UA (μmol/L) | Male ≤ 420, Female ≤ 360 = 0; Male > 420, Female > 360 = 1 |
| TG (mmol/L) | <1.70 = 0; ≥ 1.70 = 1 |
| TC (mmol/L) | <5.18 = 0; ≥ 5.18 = 1 |
Abbreviations: BMI body mass index, UA uric acid, TG triglyceride, TC total cholesterol
Non-conditional logistic regression analysis for hypertension in adults
| Variablesa | Controls (%) | Cases (%) |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Unadjusted | Adjustedb | ||
| BMI: (−) | age: (−) | 1927 (38.3) | 94 (5.8) | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) |
| (−) | (+) | 1085 (21.5) | 409 (25.2) | 7.728 (6.102 ~ 9.787)* | 6.891 (5.429 ~ 8.748)* |
| (+) | (−) | 1175 (23.3) | 239 (14.7) | 4.170 (3.249 ~ 5.351)* | 3.301 (2.556 ~ 4.264)* |
| (+) | (+) | 850 (16.9) | 881 (54.3) | 21.248 (16.925 ~ 26.675)* | 17.548 (13.931 ~ 22.103)* |
| Hyperuricemia: no | 4453 (88.4) | 1300 (80.1) | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | |
| Yes | 584 (11.6) | 323 (19.9) | 1.895 (1.632 ~ 2.200)* | 1.478 (1.246 ~ 1.752)* | |
| High TG: no | 3717 (73.8) | 933 (57.5) | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | |
| Yes | 1320 (26.2) | 690 (42.5) | 2.083 (1.853 ~ 2.340)* | 1.365 (1.191 ~ 1.564)* | |
| High TC: no | 3414 (67.8) | 824 (50.8) | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | |
| Yes | 1623 (32.2) | 799 (49.2) | 2.040 (1.820 ~ 2.286)* | 1.411 (1.241 ~ 1.604)* | |
Abbreviations: BMI body mass index, TG triglyceride, TC total cholesterol, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
aCut-offs for high BMI = 24.115 kg/m2, advanced age = 47.5 years, hyperuricemia = 420 μmol/L and 360 μmol/L in male and in female respectively, high TC = 5.18 mmol/L and high TG =1.7 mmol/L. Those with normal values were considered as the reference group
bMultivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for all other variables in the Table 4
* P < 0.001 compared with the reference group
Interactions between advanced age and high BMI
| Univariate logistic regression | Multivariate logistic regressiona | |
|---|---|---|
| I (AB) | 10.35 | 8.36 |
| AP | 48.71 % | 47.62 % |
| AP*(AB) | 51.12 % | 50.50 % |
| S | 2.05 | 2.02 |
Abbreviations: I (AB) attributed interaction, AP percentage of attributed interaction, AP*(AB) percentage of attributed interaction between pure factors, S synergy index
aThe multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for age, BMI, UA, TG, and TC