Literature DB >> 27663676

The Slav-cleft: A three-center study of the outcome of treatment of cleft lip and palate. Part 1: Craniofacial morphology.

Wanda Urbanova1, Irena Klimova2, Andrzej Brudnicki3, Petra Polackova1, Daniela Kroupova2, Ivana Dubovska4, Martin Rachwalski5, Piotr Stanislaw Fudalej6.   

Abstract

Results of a comparison of the outcomes of treatment of cleft lip and palate can be affected by growth characteristics of populations from which subjects with the clefts are derived. Moreover, conventional cephalometric techniques used in cleft studies for analysis of facial morphology provide only a partial description of shape and are confounded by biases regarding the reference structures. In this retrospective comparison, craniofacial morphology of preadolescent patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated in Warsaw (n = 35, age = 10.6 years, SD = 1.2), Prague (n = 38, age = 11.6 years, SD = 1.4), and Bratislava (n = 26, age = 10.5 years, SD = 1.6) were evaluated on cephalograms with the cephalometric method used in the Eurocleft study and geometric morphometrics. We found that patients treated in Warsaw showed slightly more favorable outcomes than in Prague and Bratislava. The differences were related primarily to the position of maxillary alveolar process, cranial base, mandibular angle, and soft tissues. Although no association between a component of treatment protocol and the outcome was found, it is possible that organizational factors such as participation of high-volume, experienced surgeons contributed to these results.
Copyright © 2016 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cephalometrics; Cleft lip; Cleft palate; Geometric morphometrics; Morphology; Slavs

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27663676     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  5 in total

1.  Coverage, reporting degree and design of the Swedish quality registry for patients born with cleft lip and/or palate.

Authors:  Kristina Klintö; Agneta Karsten; Agneta Marcusson; Anna Paganini; Sara Rizell; Jenny Cajander; Karin Brunnegård; Malin Hakelius; Åsa Okhiria; Petra Peterson; Avni Abdiu; Christina Havstam; Hans Mark; Emilie Hagberg; Lena Björnström; Anna-Paulina Wiedel; Magnus Becker
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Pattern of Morphological Variability in Unrepaired Unilateral Clefts With and Without Cleft Palate May Suggest Intrinsic Growth Deficiency.

Authors:  Benny S Latief; Mette A R Kuijpers; Adam Stebel; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Piotr S Fudalej
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-12-11

3.  Utilization of a 3D Printed Orthodontic Distalizer for Tooth-Borne Hybrid Treatment in Class II Unilateral Malocclusions.

Authors:  Andrej Thurzo; Wanda Urbanová; Bohuslav Novák; Iveta Waczulíková; Ivan Varga
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Craniofacial Growth at Age 6-11 Years after One-Stage Cleft Lip and Palate Repair: A Retrospective Comparative Study with Historical Controls.

Authors:  Benito K Benitez; Seraina K Weibel; Florian S Halbeisen; Yoriko Lill; Prasad Nalabothu; Ana Tache; Andreas A Mueller
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-13

5.  The Slavcleft: a three-center study of the outcome of treatment of cleft lip and palate. Nasolabial appearance.

Authors:  Adam Stebel; Wanda Urbanová; Irena Klimova; Andrzej Brudnicki; Ivana Dubovska; Petra Polackova; Daniela Kroupová; Magdalena Koťová; Piotr S Fudalej
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.