Literature DB >> 27663264

Surgical Results of Pure Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery for 331 Pituitary Adenomas: A 15-Year Experience from a Single Institution.

Ji Hwan Jang1, Kyu Hong Kim1, Young Min Lee1, Joon Soo Kim1, Young Zoon Kim2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to report the results of pure endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETSS) for pituitary adenomas (PAs) and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure. In addition, we tried to determine the predicting factors for progression of PAs.
METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 331 consecutive patients who underwent pure EETSS of newly diagnosed PAs between April 1998 and December 2014. Demographic, endocrinologic, and radiologic features and their outcomes, complications, and hospital stay durations were retrospectively assessed in these patients.
RESULTS: There were 157 (47.4%) nonfunctioning adenomas and 174 (52.6%) hormone-secreting adenomas. Fifty-one (15.4%) complications were present in 39 patients postoperatively. The frequent complications were temporary and permanent diabetes insipidus (14 and 3 cases, respectively), syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (9 cases), and cerebrospinal fluid leaks (6 cases). There was only 1 death (0.3%) related to the procedure in this series. The patient's age (P = 0.047), the tumor size (P = 0.003), and the parasellar growth (P <0.001) were associated with the occurrence of complications on multivariate analysis. Progression occurred in 92 (27.8%) patients and the mean time-to-progression was 23.7 months (range, 3.7-52.4 months) after a mean follow-up period of 68.5 months. In the multivariate analysis, the tumor size (P = 0.021), the extent of surgery (P = 0.012), the Knosp classification (P = 0.002), and the MIB-1 index (P = 0.019) were associated with progression-free survival. The mean duration of hospitalization was 4.4 (±1.6) days.
CONCLUSIONS: The pure EETSS of PA provides acceptable and reasonable results representing a safe alternative procedure to the traditional transsphenoidal microscopic approach. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Efficacy; Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery; Pituitary adenoma; Progression; Risk

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27663264     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  16 in total

Review 1.  Gross total resection of pituitary adenomas after endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Reem D Almutairi; Ivo S Muskens; David J Cote; Mark D Dijkman; Vasileios K Kavouridis; Erin Crocker; Kholoud Ghazawi; Marike L D Broekman; Timothy R Smith; Rania A Mekary; Hasan A Zaidi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 2.  The experience with transsphenoidal surgery and its importance to outcomes.

Authors:  Jürgen Honegger; Florian Grimm
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 3.  The incidence of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage after elective cranial surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Birgit Coucke; Laura Van Gerven; Steven De Vleeschouwer; Frank Van Calenbergh; Johannes van Loon; Tom Theys
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak after Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma M H Slot; Rengin Sabaoglu; Eduard H J Voormolen; Eelco W Hoving; Tristan P C van Doormaal
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-08-20

5.  Microsurgical therapy of pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Pietro Mortini; Lina Raffaella Barzaghi; Luigi Albano; Pietro Panni; Marco Losa
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 6.  Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: a model for neuroendocrine tumor classification.

Authors:  Ashley B Grossman; Shereen Ezzat; Sylvia L Asa; Ozgur Mete; Michael D Cusimano; Ian E McCutcheon; Arie Perry; Shozo Yamada; Hiroshi Nishioka; Olivera Casar-Borota; Silvia Uccella; Stefano La Rosa
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Surgical complications of endoscopic approach to skull base: analysis of 584 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Mohammad Taghvaei; Sara Fallah; Shokufeh Sadaghiani; Seyed Mousa Sadrhosseini; Azin Tabari; Mohammadreza Fathi; Mehdi Zeinalizadeh
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Preoperative risk factors for postoperative complications in endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel J Lobatto; Friso de Vries; Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; Alberto M Pereira; Wilco C Peul; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Nienke R Biermasz; Wouter R van Furth
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.107

9.  Ambulatory Surgery Protocol for Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Pituitary Adenomas: A Prospective Single-arm Trial with Initial Implementation Experience.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Tao Zheng; Wenhai Lv; Long Chen; Binfang Zhao; Xue Jiang; Lin Ye; Liang Qu; Lanfu Zhao; Yufu Zhang; Yafei Xue; Lei Chen; Bolin Liu; Yingxi Wu; Zhengmin Li; Jiangtao Niu; Ruigang Li; Yan Qu; Guodong Gao; Yuan Wang; Shiming He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Predictors of Postoperative Diabetes Insipidus Following Endoscopic Resection of Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  Pratima Nayak; Alaa S Montaser; Jie Hu; Daniel M Prevedello; Lawrence S Kirschner; Luma Ghalib
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2018-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.