Literature DB >> 27662532

Complication rates, lengths of stay, and readmission rates in "awake" and "asleep" deep brain simulation.

Tsinsue Chen1, Zaman Mirzadeh1, Kristina Chapple1, Margaret Lambert1, Francisco A Ponce1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE As the number of deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedures performed under general anesthesia ("asleep" DBS) increases, it is more important to assess the rates of adverse events, inpatient lengths of stay (LOS), and 30-day readmission rates in patients undergoing these procedures compared with those in patients undergoing traditional "awake" DBS without general anesthesia. METHODS All patients in an institutional database who had undergone awake or asleep DBS procedures performed by a single surgeon between August 2011 and August 2014 were reviewed. Adverse events, inpatient LOS, and 30-day readmissions were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 490 electrodes were placed in 284 patients, of whom 126 (44.4%) underwent awake surgery and 158 (55.6%) underwent asleep surgery. The most frequent overall complication for the cohort was postoperative mental status change (13 patients [4.6%]), followed by hemorrhage (4 patients [1.4%]), seizure (4 patients [1.4%]), and hardware-related infection (3 patients [1.1%]). Mean LOS for all 284 patients was 1.19 ± 1.29 days (awake: 1.06 ± 0.46 days; asleep: 1.30 ± 1.67 days; p = 0.08). Overall, the 30-day readmission rate was 1.4% (1 awake patient, 3 asleep patients). There were no significant differences in complications, LOS, and 30-day readmissions between awake and asleep groups. CONCLUSIONS Both awake and asleep DBS can be performed safely with low complication rates. The authors found no significant differences between the 2 procedure groups in adverse events, inpatient LOS, and 30-day readmission rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DBS = deep brain stimulation; GPi = globus pallidus interna; LOS = length of stay; MRSA = methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; PDQ-39 = 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire; STN = subthalamic nucleus; VIM = ventralis intermedius nucleus; adverse events; asleep deep brain stimulation; complications; deep brain stimulation; functional neurosurgery; iCT = intraoperative CT; intraoperative imaging; length of stay; readmission

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27662532     DOI: 10.3171/2016.6.JNS152946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  13 in total

1.  Combination of CT angiography and MRI in surgical planning of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Marie T Krüger; Volker A Coenen; Carolin Jenkner; Horst Urbach; Karl Egger; Peter C Reinacher
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Efficacy and Safety of Deep Brain Stimulation in Tourette Syndrome: The International Tourette Syndrome Deep Brain Stimulation Public Database and Registry.

Authors:  Daniel Martinez-Ramirez; Joohi Jimenez-Shahed; James Frederick Leckman; Mauro Porta; Domenico Servello; Fan-Gang Meng; Jens Kuhn; Daniel Huys; Juan Carlos Baldermann; Thomas Foltynie; Marwan I Hariz; Eileen M Joyce; Ludvic Zrinzo; Zinovia Kefalopoulou; Peter Silburn; Terry Coyne; Alon Y Mogilner; Michael H Pourfar; Suketu M Khandhar; Man Auyeung; Jill Louise Ostrem; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle; Marie-Laure Welter; Luc Mallet; Carine Karachi; Jean Luc Houeto; Bryan Timothy Klassen; Linda Ackermans; Takanobu Kaido; Yasin Temel; Robert E Gross; Harrison C Walker; Andres M Lozano; Benjamin L Walter; Zoltan Mari; William S Anderson; Barbara Kelly Changizi; Elena Moro; Sarah Elizabeth Zauber; Lauren E Schrock; Jian-Guo Zhang; Wei Hu; Kyle Rizer; Erin H Monari; Kelly D Foote; Irene A Malaty; Wissam Deeb; Aysegul Gunduz; Michael S Okun
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 18.302

3.  Deep Brain Stimulation of the Hypothalamus Leads to Increased Metabolic Rate in Refractory Obesity.

Authors:  Alexander C Whiting; Elizabeth F Sutton; Corey T Walker; Jakub Godzik; Joshua S Catapano; Michael Y Oh; Nestor D Tomycz; Eric Ravussin; Donald M Whiting
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.210

Review 4.  Awake versus Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: Technical Considerations and Critical Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ryan B Kochanski; Sepehr Sani
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2018-01-19

Review 5.  Comparison of Globus Pallidus Interna and Subthalamic Nucleus in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease: An Institutional Experience and Review.

Authors:  Shazia Mirza; Umar Yazdani; Richard Dewey Iii; Neepa Patel; Richard B Dewey; Svjetlana Miocinovic; Shilpa Chitnis
Journal:  Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2017-06-19

Review 6.  The role of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: an overview and update on new developments.

Authors:  John Y Fang; Christopher Tolleson
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.570

7.  Accuracy of Intraoperative Computed Tomography in Deep Brain Stimulation-A Prospective Noninferiority Study.

Authors:  Naomi I Kremer; D L Marinus Oterdoom; Peter Jan van Laar; Dan Piña-Fuentes; Teus van Laar; Gea Drost; Arjen L J van Hulzen; J Marc C van Dijk
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-01-10

8.  Single-Stage Deep Brain Stimulator Placement for Movement Disorders: A Case Series.

Authors:  Arrin Brooks; Alastair T Hoyt
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-03

9.  Passive limb movement test facilitates subthalamic deep brain stimulation under general anesthesia without influencing awareness.

Authors:  Sheng-Tzung Tsai; Shee-Ping Chen; Sheng-Huang Lin; Shinn-Zong Lin; Shin-Yuan Chen
Journal:  Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

10.  Five-Year Clinical Outcomes of Local versus General Anesthesia Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Sheng-Tzung Tsai; Tsung-Ying Chen; Sheng-Huang Lin; Shin-Yuan Chen
Journal:  Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2019-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.