Literature DB >> 27662483

In shoe pressure measurements during different motor tasks while wearing safety shoes: The effect of custom made insoles vs. prefabricated and off-the-shelf.

Paolo Caravaggi1, Alessia Giangrande2, Giada Lullini3, Giuseppe Padula4, Lisa Berti5, Alberto Leardini6.   

Abstract

Health and safety regulations in many countries require workers at risk to wear safety shoes in a factory environment. These shoes are often heavy, rigid, and uncomfortable. Wearing safety shoes daily leads to foot problems, discomfort and fatigue, resulting also in the loss of numerous working days. Currently, knowledge of the biomechanical effects of insoles in safety shoes, during working activities, is very limited. Seventeen workers from a metalworking factory were selected and clinically examined for any foot conditions. Workers feet were 3D scanned, with regards to their plantar view, and the images used to design 34 custom-insoles, based on foot and safety shoe models. Three insoles were blind-tested by each worker: custom (CUS); prefabricated with the safety-shoe (PSS), and off-the-shelf (OTS). Foot-to-insole pressure distribution was measured in seven motor tasks replicating typical working activities: single and double-leg standing; weight lifting; stair ascending and descending; normal and fast walking. Wearing CUS within safety shoes resulted in a greater uniform pressure distribution across plantar regions for most of the working activities. Peak pressure at the forefoot during normal walking was the lowest in the custom insole (CUS 275.9±55.3kPa; OTS 332.7±75.5kPa; PSS 304.5±54.2kPa). Normal and fast walking were found to be the most demanding activities in terms of peak pressure. Wearing safety shoes results in high pedobarographic parameters in several foot regions. The use of custom insoles designed on the foot morphology helps decrease peak pressure and pressure-time integral compared to prefabricated featureless insoles.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D foot scan; Custom insole; Plantar pressure; Safety shoe; Working activities

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27662483     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  5 in total

1.  Development and evaluation of a dual density insole for people standing for long periods of time at work.

Authors:  Jennifer Anderson; Anita E Williams; Chris Nester
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Evaluation of orthotic insoles for people with diabetes who are at-risk of first ulceration.

Authors:  Ana Martinez-Santos; Stephen Preece; Christopher J Nester
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Semi-automatic measurements of foot morphological parameters from 3D plantar foot scans.

Authors:  Giulia Rogati; Alberto Leardini; Maurizio Ortolani; Paolo Caravaggi
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Foot orthoses for people with rheumatoid arthritis, involving quantitative and qualitative outcomes: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Laura Ramos-Petersen; Christoper J Nester; Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron; Ana Belen Ortega-Avila
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Validation of a novel Kinect-based device for 3D scanning of the foot plantar surface in weight-bearing.

Authors:  Giulia Rogati; Alberto Leardini; Maurizio Ortolani; Paolo Caravaggi
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 2.303

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.