Literature DB >> 2766180

Should we tell them when their blood pressure is up?

W Linden1, C P Herbert, A Jenkins, V Raffle.   

Abstract

We carried out two studies to determine the effects of feedback on subsequent blood pressure and heart rate readings in subjects without significant cardiovascular abnormalities. In both studies the subjects were randomly assigned to be told that their blood pressure was normal or was high or to receive no feedback at all; 3 minutes later another reading was taken and correct feedback provided. Study 1 was done in 114 patients who attended a family practice teaching unit for an office visit; subjects taking cardioactive medication or with chronically elevated blood pressure (diastolic pressure more than 95 mm Hg) or known low pressure (diastolic pressure less than 60 mm Hg) were excluded. Half of the subjects received feedback from a nurse and the other half from a physician. We found no effect of type of feedback or type of practitioner on subsequent readings. No adaptation of diastolic blood pressure or heart rate took place, whereas a similar rest period in the laboratory consistently triggers cardiovascular adaptation. Given the field nature of the study it was not clear whether the intervention was not powerful or whether the practitioner-patient interactions diffused the effects of an otherwise powerful intervention. Therefore, a second study with the same design was carried out in a controlled laboratory setting with 61 university students who believed they were in the adaptation phase of an experimental stress protocol. The subjects did not interact with the experimenter, who provided only the initial feedback, via intercom. The findings replicated those of study 1: type of feedback had no significant effect on subsequent blood pressure levels, and all types of feedback prevented cardiovascular adaptation. We recommend that patients be allowed to rest alone for at least 10 minutes before blood pressure is measured. Our findings suggest that practitioners need not be concerned about telling normotensive or borderline hypertensive patients that their blood pressure is elevated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2766180      PMCID: PMC1451384     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  12 in total

1.  Expectancy and type of activity: effects on pre-stress cardiovascular adaptation.

Authors:  W Linden; J Frankish
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Alerting reaction and rise in blood pressure during measurement by physician and nurse.

Authors:  G Mancia; G Parati; G Pomidossi; G Grassi; R Casadei; A Zanchetti
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Lack of comparability of two automated blood pressure monitors in a hypertensive population.

Authors:  W Linden; J M Wright
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 0.825

4.  Comparative accuracy of two new electronic devices for the noninvasive determination of blood pressure.

Authors:  W Linden; B Zimmermann
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1984-06

5.  Information giving in medical care.

Authors:  H Waitzkin
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1985-06

6.  Emotional effects of false autonomic feedback.

Authors:  B Parkinson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Patient exposition and provider explanation in routine interviews and hypertensive patients' blood pressure control.

Authors:  J E Orth; W B Stiles; L Scherwitz; D Hennrikus; C Vallbona
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Relationship of physicians' nonverbal communication skill to patient satisfaction, appointment noncompliance, and physician workload.

Authors:  M R DiMatteo; R D Hays; L M Prince
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  The prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressures.

Authors:  D Perloff; M Sokolow; R Cowan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Noninvasive estimation of central aortic pressure using the oscillometric method for analyzing systemic artery pulsatile blood flow: comparative study of indirect systolic, diastolic, and mean brachial artery pressure with simultaneous direct ascending aortic pressure measurements.

Authors:  K M Borow; J W Newburger
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 4.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.