Literature DB >> 7072592

Noninvasive estimation of central aortic pressure using the oscillometric method for analyzing systemic artery pulsatile blood flow: comparative study of indirect systolic, diastolic, and mean brachial artery pressure with simultaneous direct ascending aortic pressure measurements.

K M Borow, J W Newburger.   

Abstract

Brachial artery pressures determined by the oscillometric method were compared with simultaneous central aortic (Ao) pressure measurements in 30 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Three simultaneous oscillometric and central Ao pressure readings were obtained in each patient. Central Ao pressures ranged widely for systolic (SP) (98 to 177 mm Hg), diastolic (DP) (41 to 97 mm Hg), and mean (MP) (60 to 120 mm Hg) pressure values. The mean percent errors (pressure difference divided by central Ao pressure) and "within subject" standard deviation were 1% and 3% for SP, 2% and 4% for DP, and -3% and 7% for MP. The percent error in oscillometric SP and DP estimates was not significantly influenced by cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance, heart rate, body surface area, or left ventricular ejection fraction. The oscillometric method provides accurate, reproducible, and convenient estimates of central Ao SP and DP and may be particularly useful when indirect blood pressure measurements are required for the noninvasive assessment of left ventricular function in patients without aortic stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7072592     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(82)90403-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  50 in total

Review 1.  Pulse wave analysis.

Authors:  M F O'Rourke; A Pauca; X J Jiang
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Accuracy of four indirect methods of blood pressure measurement, with hemodynamic correlations.

Authors:  G P Gravlee; J K Brockschmidt
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1990-10

Review 3.  Noninvasive studies of central aortic pressure.

Authors:  Michael F O'Rourke; Audrey Adji
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Oscillometric blood pressure standards for children.

Authors:  M K Park; S W Menard; J Schoolfield
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Standard algorithm of blood-pressure measurement by the oscillometric method.

Authors:  A Sapiński
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Blood pressure monitoring: automated oscillometric devices.

Authors:  M Ramsey
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1991-01

7.  Use of a neonatal blood pressure cuff to monitor blood pressure in the adult finger--comparison with a standard adult arm cuff.

Authors:  S Q Khan; J M Wardlaw; R Davenport; J Slattery; S Lewis
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  To eat or not to eat: affective and physiological mechanisms in the stress-eating relationship.

Authors:  T Rutledge; W Linden
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1998-06

9.  Noninvasive measurement of aortic pressure waveform by ultrasound.

Authors:  H Watanabe; M Kawai; T Sibata; M Hara; H Furuhata; S Mochizuki
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Hyperglycemia and arterial stiffness: the Atherosclerosis Risk in the Communities study.

Authors:  Jonathan Rubin; Vijay Nambi; Lloyd E Chambless; Michael W Steffes; Stephen P Juraschek; Josef Coresh; A Richey Sharrett; Elizabeth Selvin
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 5.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.