| Literature DB >> 27661084 |
Zhigang Hu1,2,3, Xiaoying Jing2, Jie Liu2, Mei Li2, Yan Ye2, Yu Chen1,3.
Abstract
The autoimmune disease antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), along with anti-β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) antibodies and lupus anticoagulant (LA). In this study, we developed a time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (TRFIA) system for simultaneous quantification of aCL IgG and IgM. A 96-well microtiter plate precoated with the complex of cardiolipin from bovine heart and bovine β2GPI was incubated with the anticardiolipin IgG and IgM standard substance or serum, and the conjugate of Eu3+-labeled anti-human IgG and Sm3+-labeled anti-human IgM was pipetted to the wells to form a tipical double-antibody-sandwich immunoreactions; finally the fluorescent intensity of Eu3+ and Sm3+ was detected to reflect the quantity of anticardiolipin IgG and IgM. This assay showed a good relationship between fluorescence intensities and the concentration of anticardiolipin antibody(aCL) IgG and IgM, with a low-end sensitivity of 0.1 U/ml for IgG and 0.1 U/ml for IgM, respectively. The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV) of the calibrators was 3.0% and 4.51% for IgG, and 2.76% and 4.45% for IgM. The average recovery was 100.38% for aCL IgG and 100.45% for aCL IgM. For serum samples, the results of our method showed a good correlation with those obtained with ELISA kit. Simultaneous detection of aCL-IgG and aCL-IgM in the same reaction well can optimize assay performance by avoiding potential influence of different reaction conditions-timing, and well-to-well difference in concentration and characteristics of cardiolipin antigen. The results of a combo aCL-IgG and aCL-IgM assay for the same sample are more consistent and more reliable. This dual-label time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay is sensitive for detecting aCL IgG and IgM across a wide concentration range with stable reagents and may assist in the clinical diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27661084 PMCID: PMC5035058 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163682
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Schematic illustration of the dual-labeling TRFIA for simultaneous detection of aCL IgG and IgM.
First, pipette 100μl/well pretreated standard substance or serum to microtiter plate that precoated with aCL antigen, and incubated the plate with shaking for 30 min at 25°C. A washing step removes unbound and unspecifically bound serum or plasma components. Second, added 100μl conjugate of buffer diluted Eu3+-labeled anti-human IgG and buffer diluted Sm3+-labeled anti-human IgM into each well, and incubated with shaking for 30min at 25°C. A second washing step removes unbound conjugate. Then, 200μl enhancement solution was pipette to each well and shaken for 5 min. Last, read the fluorescent intensity.
Fig 2The calibration curves for aCL IgG and IgM using proposed dual-labeling TRFIA.
Intra- and Inter-assay precision of dual-label assay for aCL IgM and aCL IgG in serum of controls.
It was analyzed by measuring three pools of mixed serum specimens with high, intermediate and low concentration of aCL IgM and IgG 25 times in one series (intra-assay) and in duplicate in ten different series.
| aCL IgM(U/ml) | aCL IgG(U/ml) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mean ± SD | CV (%) | mean ± SD | CV (%) | |
| High | ||||
| Intra-batch(n = 25) | 211.5±2.78 | 1.31 | 249.2±2.99 | 1.2 |
| Inter-batch(n = 10) | 210.9±4.83 | 2.29 | 249.2±5.64 | 2.26 |
| Intermediate | ||||
| Intra-batch(n = 25) | 71.53±2.02 | 2.82 | 82.77±2.63 | 3.18 |
| Inter-batch(n = 10) | 71.7±2.92 | 4.08 | 82.06±3.23 | 3.93 |
| Low | ||||
| Intra-batch(n = 25) | 14.46±0.60 | 4.14 | 15.62±0.72 | 4.61 |
| Inter-batch(n = 10) | 14.7±1.02 | 6.97 | 15.77±1.16 | 7.34 |
Recovery rate of dual-label assay for aCL IgG.
| Sample | Dilution | Observed(U/ml) | Expected(U/ml) | O/E (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1:100 | 167.5 | ||
| 1:200 | 84.65 | 83.75 | 101.07 | |
| 1:400 | 42.26 | 41.88 | 100.91 | |
| 1:800 | 20.23 | 20.94 | 96.61 | |
| 2 | 1:100 | 73.6 | ||
| 1:200 | 35.24 | 36.8 | 95.76 | |
| 1:400 | 19.53 | 18.4 | 106.14 | |
| 1:800 | 8.75 | 9.2 | 95.11 | |
| 3 | 1:100 | 94.7 | ||
| 1:200 | 46.17 | 47.35 | 97.51 | |
| 1:400 | 24.76 | 23.68 | 104.56 | |
| 1:800 | 12.53 | 11.84 | 105.83 |
Recovery rate of dual-label assay for aCL IgM.
| Sample | Dilution | Observed(U/ml) | Expected(U/ml) | O/E (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1:100 | 157.6 | ||
| 1:200 | 81.25 | 78.8 | 103.11 | |
| 1:400 | 37.84 | 39.4 | 96.04 | |
| 1:800 | 19.12 | 19.7 | 97.06 | |
| 2 | 1:100 | 103.4 | ||
| 1:200 | 50.12 | 51.7 | 96.94 | |
| 1:400 | 27.54 | 25.85 | 106.54 | |
| 1:800 | 13.41 | 12.93 | 103.71 | |
| 3 | 1:100 | 75.5 | ||
| 1:200 | 38.52 | 37.75 | 102.04 | |
| 1:400 | 18.15 | 18.88 | 96.13 | |
| 1:800 | 9.67 | 9.44 | 102.44 |
Fig 3Correlation between ELISA and dual-label assay of aCL IgG (Fig 3a) and IgM (Fig 3b) in human sera (n = 52).
Fig 4The comparison of liner range between ELISA and dual-label TRFIA for the detection of aCL IgG (Fig 4a) and IgM (Fig 4b), respectively.
Clinical positive rate.
| Case number | ACA-IgG | ACA-IgM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive number | Positive rate(%) | Positive number | Positive rate(%) | ||
| scleroderma | 24 | 4 | 16.67 | 1 | 4.17 |
| Nephritic syndrome | 36 | 1 | 2.78 | 4 | 11.11 |
| Ankylosing spondylitis | 14 | 1 | 7.14 | 2 | 14.29 |
| Cerebral infarction | 117 | 4 | 3.42 | 4 | 3.42 |
| Lupus nephritis | 33 | 5 | 15.15 | 9 | 27.27 |
| Sicca syndrome | 63 | 3 | 4.76 | 2 | 3.17 |
| Systemic lupus erythematosus | 153 | 12 | 7.84 | 13 | 8.5 |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | 70 | 6 | 8.57 | 7 | 10 |
| total | 510 | 34 | 6.67 | 42 | 8.24 |
The strength and weakness of the dual-label TRFIA.
| Strength | Weakness | |
|---|---|---|
| Detection range is wide | Need special instruments | |
| TRFIA | Detection objects are 2 kinds | |
| Markers are stable and environmental protection | ||
| Signal results is stable in a long time |