| Literature DB >> 27660702 |
Laura Maccarana1, Mirko Cattani1, Franco Tagliapietra2, Lucia Bailoni1, Stefano Schiavon2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Modification of chemical composition of diets fed to dairy cows might be a good strategy to reduce methane (CH4) production in the rumen. Notable reductions of CH4 production compared to conventional high-roughages rations were more frequently observed for very concentrated diets or when fat supplements were used. In these cases, the reduction in the gas emission was mainly a consequence of an overall impairment of rumen function with a reduction of fiber digestibility. These strategies do not always comply with feeding standards used in intensive dairy farms and they are usually not applied owing to the risks of negative health and economic consequences. Thus, the present study evaluated the effects of seven commercial diets with contents of neutral detergent fiber (NDF), protein and lipids ranging 325 to 435 g/kg DM, 115 to 194 g/kg DM, and 26 to 61 g/kg DM, respectively, on in vitro degradability, gas (GP), and CH4 production.Entities:
Keywords: Dairy cows; Dietary manipulation; Gas production; In vitro techniques; Methane production
Year: 2016 PMID: 27660702 PMCID: PMC5026773 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-016-0109-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Biotechnol ISSN: 1674-9782
Feed ingredients, chemical composition and gross energy content of seven diets
| Reference | Low NDF | High NDF | Low CP | High CP | Low Lipid | High Lipid | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ingredients, g/kg DM | |||||||
| Corn silage | 351 | 430 | – | 375 | 281 | 351 | 351 |
| Alfalfa hay | 89 | 23 | 134 | 66 | 156 | 89 | 89 |
| Ryegrass hay | 47 | – | 231 | 43 | 52 | 47 | 56 |
| Meadow hay | 47 | – | 227 | 47 | 52 | 47 | 60 |
| Corn grain | 205 | 228 | 152 | 258 | 147 | 218 | 160 |
| Barley grain | 119 | 171 | 92 | 160 | 90 | 122 | 100 |
| Soybean meal, (sol. extr., 44) | 113 | 119 | 126 | 27 | 188 | 126 | 18 |
| Whole soybean seeds, cracked | – | – | – | – | – | – | 68 |
| Extruded soybean seeds | – | – | – | – | – | – | 68 |
| Extruded flaxseed seeds | 29 | 29 | 38 | 24 | 34 | – | 29 |
| Chemical composition, g/kg DM | |||||||
| Crude protein (CP) | 158 | 152 | 161 | 115 | 194 | 161 | 158 |
| Starch | 273 | 273 | 100 | 332 | 176 | 265 | 233 |
| NDF | 361 | 325 | 435 | 358 | 357 | 359 | 360 |
| Hemicellulose | 169 | 171 | 189 | 172 | 158 | 171 | 169 |
| ADF | 192 | 154 | 246 | 186 | 199 | 188 | 191 |
| Cellulose | 163 | 134 | 203 | 160 | 167 | 163 | 163 |
| Lignin(sa) | 29 | 20 | 43 | 26 | 32 | 25 | 28 |
| NFCa | 395 | 443 | 302 | 446 | 357 | 402 | 367 |
| Ether extract | 33 | 34 | 38 | 34 | 34 | 26 | 61 |
| Ash | 53 | 46 | 64 | 47 | 58 | 52 | 54 |
| Gross energy, MJ/kg DMb | 16.8 | 16.9 | 17.3 | 16.8 | 17.3 | 16.5 | 16.7 |
a NFC Not Fiber Carbohydrates computed as 100 - NDF - CP - EE - Ash
bMeasured by a bomb calorimeter method [16]
Effect of diets and incubation time on pH, ammonia N concentration, volatile fatty acid production (VFA) and molar proportions of acetate, propionate, butyrate and other VFA
| pH | Ammonia N, mg/L | VFA, mmoL/L | Acetate (Ac), % VFA | Propionate (Pr), % VFA | Ac:Pr | Butyrate, % VFA | Other VFA, % VFA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diet | ||||||||
| Reference | 6.87 | 202 | 5.08 | 56.1 | 23.5 | 2.40 | 16.0 | 4.47 |
| Low NDF | 6.88 | 192 | 5.37 | 55.8 | 23.7 | 2.36 | 16.2 | 4.29 |
| High NDF | 6.90 | 223A | 4.44 | 58.5A | 23.1 | 2.53 | 13.3B | 4.26B |
| Low CP | 6.85 | 171 | 5.06 | 56.0 | 24.3 | 2.31 | 16.1 | 3.71B |
| High CP | 6.87 | 222A | 4.89 | 57.2 | 22.8 | 2.51 | 14.6 | 4.85A |
| Low lipid | 6.87 | 207 | 4.96 | 56.4 | 23.7 | 2.39 | 15.5 | 4.26B |
| High lipid | 6.90 | 197 | 4.99 | 56.7 | 23.5 | 2.41 | 15.4 | 4.36 |
| SEM | 0.043 | 28.5 | 0.231 | 0.25 | 0.64 | 0.062 | 0.91 | 0.158 |
|
| 0.46 | 0.008 | 0.25 | <0.001 | 0.06 | 0.001 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
|
| ||||||||
| Low vs High NDF | 0.99 | 0.44 | 0.23 | <0.001 | 0.99 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.99 |
| Low vs High CP | 0.99 | 0.014 | 0.99 | 0.048 | 0.048 | <0.001 | 0.99 | <0.001 |
| Low vs High lipid | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.65 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| Incubation time | ||||||||
| 24 h | 6.95 | 202 | 4.47 | 57.2 | 22.9 | 2.50 | 15.8 | 3.87 |
| 48 h | 6.80 | 202 | 5.47 | 56.1 | 24.1 | 2.33 | 14.7 | 4.76 |
| SEM | 0.055 | 38.7 | 0.123 | 0.13 | 0.82 | 0.077 | 1.15 | 0.201 |
|
| 0.31 | 0.99 | 0.029 | 0.026 | 0.39 | 0.26 | 0.58 | 0.09 |
| RMSE | 0.032 | 17.5 | 0.462 | 0.49 | 0.60 | 0.112 | 0.87 | 0.147 |
Values with different superscripts within column are significantly (P < 0.05) higher (A) or lower (B) compared to the reference diet (containing 361, 158, and 33 g/kg DM of NDF, CP, and lipids)
Low NDF low NDF diet (325 g/kg DM); High NDF high NDF diet (435 g/kg DM), Low CP low protein diet (CP, 115 g/kg DM), High CP high protein diet (CP, 194 g/kg DM), Low lipid low lipid diet (EE, 26 g/kg DM), High lipid high lipid diet (EE, 61 g/kg DM)
Effects of diets and incubation time on in vitro degradability of NDF (NDFd) and of true DM (TDMd), gas production (GP) and methane (CH4) production, and predicted values of GP and CH4 production
| Degradability | Actual GP, ml per: | Actual CH4 mL per | Predicted GP | Predicted CH4 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDFd, g/kg NDF | TDMd, g/kg DM | g DM | g TDMd | g DM | g dNDF | g TDMd | 100 mL GP | mL/g DM | mL/g DM | |
| Diet | ||||||||||
| Reference | 567 | 840 | 274 | 325 | 34.2 | 168 | 40.8 | 12.5 | 244 | 38.8 |
| Low NDF | 612A | 872A | 288A | 331 | 34.4 | 174 | 39.3 | 11.9 | 250 | 39.6 |
| High NDF | 480B | 767B | 228B | 300B | 30.8B | 151B | 39.9 | 13.5A | 220 | 35.9 |
| Low CP | 545 | 835 | 277 | 333 | 33.4 | 169 | 39.9 | 12.0 | 242 | 38.0 |
| High CP | 542 | 831 | 255B | 310 | 34.0 | 176 | 41.0 | 13.3A | 234 | 37.8 |
| Low lipid | 583 | 845 | 265 | 315 | 33.1 | 159 | 39.0 | 12.3 | 251 | 37.2 |
| High lipid | 531 | 826 | 253B | 304B | 32.2B | 169 | 38.8 | 12.5 | 238 | 37.9 |
| SEM | 10.3 | 4.2 | 5.6 | 7.2 | 0.53 | 3.4 | 0.63 | 0.40 | 10.9 | 2.09 |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.025 | <0.001 | 0.33 | 0.70 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Low vs High NDF | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.99 | <0.001 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| Low vs High CP | 0.99 | 0.99 | <0.001 | 0.009 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | <0.001 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| Low vs High lipid | 0.003 | 0.028 | 0.017 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| Incubation time | ||||||||||
| 24 h | 472 | 801 | 250 | 314 | 29.6 | 172 | 37.0 | 11.9 | 214 | 34.9 |
| 48 h | 631 | 860 | 276 | 320 | 36.7 | 161 | 42.6 | 13.2 | 260 | 41.5 |
| SEM | 10.5 | 3.5 | 7.4 | 8.8 | 0.59 | 1.8 | 0.66 | 0.54 | 7.6 | 1.69 |
|
| 0.009 | 0.007 | 0.14 | 0.69 | 0.014 | 0.046 | 0.027 | 0.22 | 0.06 | 0.12 |
| RMSE | 15.5 | 7.2 | 4.0 | 7.6 | 0.69 | 3.2 | 0.94 | 0.25 | 21.9 | 3.78 |
Values with different superscripts within column are significantly (P < 0.05) higher (A) or lower (B) compared to the reference diet (containing 361, 158, and 33 g/kg DM of NDF, CP, and lipids)
Low NDF low NDF diet (325 g/kg DM), High NDF high NDF diet (435 g/kg DM), Low CP low protein diet (CP, 115 g/kg DM), High CP high protein diet (CP, 194 g/kg DM), Low lipid low lipid diet (EE, 26 g/kg DM), High lipid high lipid diet (EE, 61 g/kg DM)