| Literature DB >> 27659737 |
Vassilios S Vassiliou1,2, Ee Ling Heng3,4, Peter D Gatehouse3,4, Jacqueline Donovan5, Claire E Raphael3,4, Shivraman Giri6, Sonya V Babu-Narayan3,4, Michael A Gatzoulis3,4, Dudley J Pennell3,4, Sanjay K Prasad3,4, David N Firmin3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) phantoms are routinely used for quality assurance in MRI centres; however their long term stability for verification of myocardial T1/ extracellular volume fraction (ECV) mapping has never been investigated.Entities:
Keywords: Agarose; Nickel; Phantoms; Stability; T1 mapping
Year: 2016 PMID: 27659737 PMCID: PMC5034463 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-016-0275-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Fig. 1Title: A 60mls narrow neck bottle used. Legend: The 60mls narrow-neck bottles used (Fisherbrand TM Clear Soda Lime Glass Boston Round Narrow Mouth Bottles with Polyvinyl Cap) to minimise gel-to-environment exposure by reducing the contact surface area. These were considered more likely to deliver stability than thin-wall tubes with poorly-fitting broad caps
Final relative concentrations of Nickel ion (Ni2+) and Agarose required to mimic native and late-Gd human blood and myocardium T1 and T2 values
| Nickel (mM) | Agarose (%) | T1 (ms) | T2 (ms) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixture A | 0.90 | 2.10 | 1000 | 55 |
| Mixture B | 0.48 | 0.45 | 1500 | 225 |
| Mixture C | 2.35 | 2.50 | 510 | 44 |
| Mixture D | 3.70 | 0.45 | 365 | 125 |
Fig. 2Title: Post processing T1 and T2 images. Each phantom mixture was included twice giving a total of four different mixtures. Legend: Panel a is the original inversion recovery image, panel b is the spin echo magnitude image. Panels c and d represent the final maps; panel C is the T1 map and panel D is the T2 map. The ROI mean values were taken well within the phantoms away from edge-ringing artefacts such as Gibbs artefact [26] using CMR Tools
Fig. 3Title: The phantom arrangement during the water bath. Legend: Image showing the phantoms in the water bath, the mercury thermometer (arrow) stabilised in the water bath and the preparation inside the MRI scanner
Showing the variation during a 52 week period of the Phantom unadjusted T1 and T2 values and ECV using an 11-cycle 8-image MOLLI native (pre-Gd) 5(3)3 and post-Gd 4(1)3(1)2. Two phantoms for each T1 and T2 mixture were installed in the box. The value used for analysis represents the average of the two. The phantom ECV was calculated from the myocardial and blood native and post-Gd phantom T1 values using a haematocrit of 0.425. This was a chosen value representing a typical adult human haematocrit
| T1 | T2 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (ms) | SD | CoV (%) | Mean (ms) | SD | CoV (%) | Mean (ms) | SD | CoV (%) | |
| High resolution (75 bpm) | Low resolution (100 bpm) | Spin-echo protocol | |||||||
| Native myocardium | 971.8 | 12.6 | 1.3 | 971.8 | 13.6 | 1.4 | 56 | 1.3 | 2.2 |
| Native blood | 1578.8 | 56.4 | 3.6 | 1549.8 | 61.9 | 4.0 | 234 | 8.0 | 3.4 |
| Post Gd myocardium | 498.3 | 5.1 | 1.0 | 497.6 | 13.5 | 1.4 | 48 | 0.9 | 1.9 |
| Post Gd blood | 371.9 | 6.4 | 1.7 | 371.8 | 6.5 | 1.8 | 149 | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| ECV | 27.4 % | 0.9 | 3.2 | 27.6 % | 0.9 | 3.1 | |||
Showing the overall relative changes in the various T1 parameters over a 12 month period. Independently of method used, all the parameters showed a change of <10 %
| Method 1 (%) | Method 2 (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Native blood / ms | 9.0 | 7.8 |
| Native myocardium / ms | 3.6 | 0.5 |
| Post Gd myocardium / ms | 2.9 | 1.9 |
| Post Gd blood / ms | 5.0 | 3.5 |
| ECV / % | 8.3 | 5.3 |
Fig. 4Title: Longitudinal imaging for T1 values and variation in temperature. Legend: Panel a longitudinal stability without temperature correction for native and post contrast myocardial and blood phantom T1 values. The phantoms corresponding to native blood T1 values showed a slow drift, whist the remaining phantoms corresponding to native myocardium and post-contrast blood and myocardium remained relatively stable. Panel b weekly temperature variation of the MRI room. Panel c fusing the individual variables from panel a , and a haematocrit of 0.425 a Phantom ECV was calculated
Fig. 5Title: Temperature adjusted T1 values. Legend: Longitudinal follow-up showing adjusted values for T1 (panel a) and ECV (panel b) incorporating the small temperature variation. The overall results however, of a small drift in the native blood T1 phantoms remained unchanged
Fig. 6Title: T1 variation with temperature. Legend: Effect of temperature variation on native and post-Gd myocardial and blood T1. This effect appears to predominantly affect the longer T1 values
Fig. 7Title: ECV change with heart rate variation. Legend: Graph demonstrating the linear relationship of between HR change and change in ECV. This change was overall small with a 0.13 % absolute increase per 10 heart beat increase
Fig. 8Title: Change in T1 values with heart rate variation. Legend: The effect of heart rate variation in phantoms modeling native and post-Gd myocardium and blood