Literature DB >> 27659350

Comparison Over Time of Vault in Chinese Eyes Receiving Implantable Contact Lenses With or Without a Central Hole.

Xinfang Cao1, Weiliang Wu2, Yang Wang1, Chen Xie1, Ye Shen3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the longitudinal vault changes after implantation of a posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) (Visian implantable contact lens) with (ICL V4c) and without (ICL V4) a central artificial hole for moderate to high myopia in Chinese eyes.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: This study comprised 78 eyes implanted with the ICL V4c model and 82 eyes implanted with the ICL V4 model at our department by the same surgeon. The time course of the postoperative pIOL vault changes was quantitatively assessed using ultrasound biomicroscopy over 6 months.
RESULTS: There was a trend toward a decrease in all measures of central vault, peripheral vault, and the endothelium-anterior pIOL distance for both central hole pIOL and conventional pIOL over time, although the variance was not statistically significant (all P > .05). There were no significant between-group differences in the amount of the pIOL central vault, peripheral vault, or the endothelium-anterior pIOL distance at any time point after surgery (all P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The time course of the central hole pIOL vault changes is essentially equivalent to that of the conventional pIOL vault, suggesting that the presence of the central hole did not significantly affect the pIOL position.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27659350     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  6 in total

1.  Full-vision maintenance in extra-high myopia from implantable collamer lens to trifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Shu-Yang Chen; Chen Xie; Yang Wang; Ye Shen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Inter-eye and postoperative prediction of vault after implantation of EVO + Visian phakic implantable collamer lens.

Authors:  Elena Martínez-Plaza; Alberto López-Miguel; Alberto López-de la Rosa; Miguel J Maldonado
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 2.029

3.  Buffering zone of implantable Collamer lens sizing in V4c.

Authors:  Seung Wan Nam; Dong Hui Lim; Joo Hyun; Eui-Sang Chung; Tae-Young Chung
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Safety and anterior chamber structure of evolution implantable Collamer lens implantation with short white-to-white corneal diameters.

Authors:  Xun Chen; Fang Chen; Xuanqi Wang; Yilin Xu; Mingrui Cheng; Tian Han; Xiaoying Wang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-17

5.  Factors leading to realignment or exchange after implantable collamer lens implantation in 10 258 eyes.

Authors:  Ruoyan Wei; Meiyan Li; Aruma Aruma; Michael C Knorz; Dong Yang; Yongfu Yu; Xiaoying Wang; Joanne Choi; Peijun Yao; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Comparison of anterior chamber angle changes following phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole implantation for moderate to high myopic eyes.

Authors:  Tian'an Zhou; Hui Jiang; Yang Wang; Chen Xie; Jianhua Xia; Ye Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.