S Sho1, M Yilma1, M W Yeh1, M Livhits1, J X Wu1, J K Hoang2, A R Sepahdari3. 1. From the Department of Surgery (S.S., M.Y., M.W.Y., M.L., J.X.W.), Section of Endocrine Surgery. 2. Department of Radiology (J.K.H.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 3. Department of Radiological Sciences (A.R.S.), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California ali.sepahdari@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with multigland primary hyperparathyroidism are at higher risk for missed lesions on imaging and failed parathyroidectomy. The purpose of this study was to prospectively validate the ability of previously derived predictive score systems, the composite multigland disease score, and the multiphase multidetector contrast-enhanced CT (4D-CT) composite multigland disease score, to identify patients with a high likelihood of multigland disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study of 71 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent 4D-CT and successful parathyroidectomy. The size and number of lesions identified on 4D-CT, serum calcium levels, and parathyroid hormone levels were collected. A composite multigland disease score was calculated from 4D-CT imaging findings and the Wisconsin Index (the product of the serum calcium and parathyroid hormone levels). A 4D-CT multigland disease score was obtained by using the CT data alone. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients with multigland disease were compared with 43 patients with single-gland disease. Patients with multigland disease had a significantly smaller lesion size (P < .01) and a higher likelihood of having either ≥2 or 0 lesions identified on 4D-CT (P < .01). Composite multigland disease scores of ≥4, ≥5, and 6 had specificities of 72%, 86%, and 100% for multigland disease, respectively. 4D-CT multigland disease scores of ≥3 and 4 had specificities of 74% and 88%. CONCLUSIONS: Predictive scoring systems based on 4D-CT data, with or without laboratory data, were able to identify a subgroup of patients with a high likelihood of multigland disease in a prospectively accrued population of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. These scoring systems can aid in surgical planning.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Patients with multigland primary hyperparathyroidism are at higher risk for missed lesions on imaging and failed parathyroidectomy. The purpose of this study was to prospectively validate the ability of previously derived predictive score systems, the composite multigland disease score, and the multiphase multidetector contrast-enhanced CT (4D-CT) composite multigland disease score, to identify patients with a high likelihood of multigland disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study of 71 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent 4D-CT and successful parathyroidectomy. The size and number of lesions identified on 4D-CT, serum calcium levels, and parathyroid hormone levels were collected. A composite multigland disease score was calculated from 4D-CT imaging findings and the Wisconsin Index (the product of the serum calcium and parathyroid hormone levels). A 4D-CT multigland disease score was obtained by using the CT data alone. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients with multigland disease were compared with 43 patients with single-gland disease. Patients with multigland disease had a significantly smaller lesion size (P < .01) and a higher likelihood of having either ≥2 or 0 lesions identified on 4D-CT (P < .01). Composite multigland disease scores of ≥4, ≥5, and 6 had specificities of 72%, 86%, and 100% for multigland disease, respectively. 4D-CT multigland disease scores of ≥3 and 4 had specificities of 74% and 88%. CONCLUSIONS: Predictive scoring systems based on 4D-CT data, with or without laboratory data, were able to identify a subgroup of patients with a high likelihood of multigland disease in a prospectively accrued population of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. These scoring systems can aid in surgical planning.
Authors: Ali R Sepahdari; Michael W Yeh; David Rodrigues; Sarah N Khan; Avital Harari Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2013 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Steven E Rodgers; George J Hunter; Leena M Hamberg; Dawid Schellingerhout; David B Doherty; Gregory D Ayers; Suzanne E Shapiro; Beth S Edeiken; Mylene T Truong; Douglas B Evans; Jeffrey E Lee; Nancy D Perrier Journal: Surgery Date: 2006-10-02 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Allan Siperstein; Eren Berber; German F Barbosa; Michael Tsinberg; Andrew B Greene; Jamie Mitchell; Mira Milas Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Allan Siperstein; Eren Berber; Richard Mackey; Mohammed Alghoul; Kristin Wagner; Mira Milas Journal: Surgery Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Mario Serradilla-Martín; Ana Palomares-Cano; Miguel Cantalejo-Díaz; Mónica Mogollón-González; Esther Brea-Gómez; Nuria Victoria Muñoz-Pérez; Juan Ignacio Arcelus-Martínez; Jesús María Villar-Del-Moral Journal: Gland Surg Date: 2021-03
Authors: Steven Raeymaeckers; Yannick De Brucker; Tim Vanderhasselt; Nico Buls; Johan De Mey Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 1.930