Literature DB >> 27658275

Moral Agency, Moral Imagination, and Moral Community: Antidotes to Moral Distress.

Terri Traudt1, Joan Liaschenko2, Cynthia Peden-McAlpine3.   

Abstract

Moral distress has been covered extensively in the nursing literature and increasingly in the literature of other health professions. Cases that cause nurses' moral distress that are mentioned most frequently are those concerned with prolonging the dying process. Given the standard of aggressive treatment that is typical in intensive care units (ICUs), much of the existing moral distress research focuses on the experiences of critical care nurses. However, moral distress does not automatically occur in all end-of-life circumstances, nor does every critical care nurse suffer its damaging effects. What are the practices of these nurses? What specifically do they do to navigate around or through the distressing situations? The nursing literature is lacking an answer to these questions. This article reports a study that used narrative analysis to explore the reported practices of experienced critical care nurses who are skilled at and comfortable working with families and physicians regarding the withdrawal of aggressive treatment. A major finding was that these nurses did not report experiencing the damaging effects of moral distress as described in the nursing literature. The verbal communication and stated practices relevant to this finding are organized under three major themes: (1) moral agency, (2) moral imagination, and (3) moral community. Further, a total of eight subthemes are identified. The practices that constitute these themes and subthemes are further detailed and discussed in this article. Understanding these practices can help mitigate critical care nurses' moral distress. Copyright 2016 The Journal of Clinical Ethics. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27658275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Ethics        ISSN: 1046-7890


  8 in total

1.  Clinician distress in seriously ill patient care: A dimensional analysis.

Authors:  Anessa M Foxwell; Salimah H Meghani; Connie M Ulrich
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 2.874

2.  Ethical conflict and moral distress in veterinary practice: A survey of North American veterinarians.

Authors:  Lisa Moses; Monica J Malowney; Jon Wesley Boyd
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  What is "moral distress" in nursing? How, can and should we respond to it?

Authors:  Georgina Morley
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 4.  Strengthening Workplace Well-Being in Research Animal Facilities.

Authors:  Judy Murray; Cassondra Bauer; Nicole Vilminot; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-10-29

5.  Care for critically and terminally ill patients and moral distress of physicians and nurses in tertiary hospitals in South Korea: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Jiyeon Kang; Eun Kyung Choi; Minjeong Seo; Grace S Ahn; Hye Youn Park; Jinui Hong; Min Sun Kim; Bhumsuk Keam; Hye Yoon Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Codes of ethics for psychiatrists: past, present and prospect.

Authors:  Sidney Bloch; Felicity Kenn; Izaak Lim
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 10.592

Review 7.  Nurses' Experiences of their Ethical Responsibilities during Coronavirus Outbreaks: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Peter; Caroline Variath; Shan Mohammed; Mikaela Mitchell; Tieghan Killackey; Jane Maciver; Conor Chiasson
Journal:  Can J Nurs Res       Date:  2022-02-15

8.  Experiences of moral distress in a COVID-19 intensive care unit: A qualitative study of nurses and respiratory therapists in the United States.

Authors:  Sophie Trachtenberg; Tara Tehan; Sara Shostak; Colleen Snydeman; Mariah Lewis; Frederic Romain; Wendy Cadge; Mary Elizabeth McAuley; Cristina Matthews; Laura Lux; Robert Kacmarek; Katelyn Grone; Vivian Donahue; Julia Bandini; Ellen Robinson
Journal:  Nurs Inq       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 2.658

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.