Literature DB >> 20878833

Sexual functioning along the cancer continuum: focus group results from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®).

Kathryn E Flynn1, Diana D Jeffery, Francis J Keefe, Laura S Porter, Rebecca A Shelby, Maria R Fawzy, Tracy K Gosselin, Bryce B Reeve, Kevin P Weinfurt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cancer and treatments for cancer affect specific aspects of sexual functioning and intimacy; however, limited qualitative work has been done in diverse cancer populations. As part of an effort to improve measurement of self-reported sexual functioning, we explored the scope and importance of sexual functioning and intimacy to patients across cancer sites and along the continuum of care.
METHODS: We conducted 16 diagnosis- and sex-specific focus groups with patients recruited from the Duke University tumor registry and oncology/hematology clinics (N=109). A trained note taker produced field notes summarizing the discussions. An independent auditor verified field notes against written transcripts. The content of the discussions was analyzed for major themes by two independent coders.
RESULTS: Across all cancers, the most commonly discussed cancer- or treatment-related effects on sexual functioning and intimacy were fatigue, treatment-related hair loss, weight gain and organ loss or scarring. Additional barriers were unique to particular diagnoses, such as shortness of breath in lung cancer, gastrointestinal problems in colorectal cancers and incontinence in prostate cancer. Sexual functioning and intimacy were considered important to quality of life. While most effects of cancer were considered negative, many participants identified improvements to intimacy after cancer.
CONCLUSION: Overall evaluations of satisfaction with sex life did not always correspond to specific aspects of functioning (e.g. erectile dysfunction), presenting a challenge to researchers aiming to measure sexual functioning as an outcome. Health-care providers should not assume that level of sexual impairment determines sexual satisfaction and should explore cancer patients' sexual concerns directly.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20878833      PMCID: PMC3013236          DOI: 10.1002/pon.1738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  20 in total

1.  Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Ron D Hays; Jakob B Bjorner; Karon F Cook; Paul K Crane; Jeanne A Teresi; David Thissen; Dennis A Revicki; David J Weiss; Ronald K Hambleton; Honghu Liu; Richard Gershon; Steven P Reise; Jin-shei Lai; David Cella
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  The impact of cancer on sexual function: a controlled study.

Authors:  Hema Ananth; Louise Jones; Michael King; Adrian Tookman
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.762

3.  Dimensions of quality of life expressed by men treated for metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  J A Clark; N Wray; B Brody; C Ashton; B Giesler; H Watkins
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  The aftermath of breast cancer: an altered sexual self.

Authors:  M C Wilmoth
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.592

5.  Sexuality after treatment for early prostate cancer: exploring the meanings of "erectile dysfunction".

Authors:  B G Bokhour; J A Clark; T S Inui; R A Silliman; J A Talcott
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Assessing women's sexuality after cancer therapy: checking assumptions with the focus group technique.

Authors:  D W Bruner; C P Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.592

7.  Communicating about patient sexuality and intimacy after cancer: mismatched expectations and unmet needs.

Authors:  Amanda J Hordern; Annette F Street
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2007-03-05       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Evaluation of item candidates: the PROMIS qualitative item review.

Authors:  Darren A DeWalt; Nan Rothrock; Susan Yount; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Sexuality in palliative care: patient perspectives.

Authors:  Laurie Lemieux; Stefanie Kaiser; Jose Pereira; Lynn M Meadows
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.762

10.  Social problems in oncology.

Authors:  E P Wright; M A Kiely; P Lynch; A Cull; P J Selby
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-11-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  44 in total

1.  A single-arm clinical trial investigating the effectiveness of a non-hormonal, hyaluronic acid-based vaginal moisturizer in endometrial cancer survivors.

Authors:  Jeanne Carter; Shari Goldfarb; Raymond E Baser; Deborah J Goldfrank; Barbara Seidel; Lisania Milli; Sally Saban; Cara Stabile; Jocelyn Canty; Ginger J Gardner; Elizabeth L Jewell; Yukio Sonoda; Marisa A Kollmeier; Kaled M Alektiar
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Sexual health problems in French cancer survivors 2 years after diagnosis-the national VICAN survey.

Authors:  Ali Ben Charif; Anne-Déborah Bouhnik; Blandine Courbière; Dominique Rey; Marie Préau; Marc-Karim Bendiane; Patrick Peretti-Watel; Julien Mancini
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Assessing the invariance of a culturally competent multi-lingual unmet needs survey for immigrant and Australian-born cancer patients: a Rasch analysis.

Authors:  J A McGrane; P N Butow; M Sze; M Eisenbruch; D Goldstein; M T King
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Psychometric Evaluation of PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures in a Longitudinal Population-Based Cohort of Men With Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Mian Wang; Kevin Weinfurt; Kathryn E Flynn; Deborah S Usinger; Ronald C Chen
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  A manifesto on the preservation of sexual function in women and girls with cancer.

Authors:  Stacy Tessler Lindau; Emily M Abramsohn; Amber C Matthews
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Cancer negatively impacts on sexual function in adolescents and young adults: The AYA HOPE study.

Authors:  Lena Wettergren; Erin E Kent; Sandra A Mitchell; Brad Zebrack; Charles F Lynch; Mara B Rubenstein; Theresa H M Keegan; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Helen M Parsons; Ashley Wilder Smith
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Accuracy of 30-day recall for components of sexual function and the moderating effects of gender and mood.

Authors:  Kevin P Weinfurt; Li Lin; Carrie B Dombeck; Joan E Broderick; Denise C Snyder; Megan S Williams; Maria R Fawzy; Kathryn E Flynn
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Assessment of vulvar discomfort with sexual activity among women in the United States.

Authors:  Kathryn E Flynn; Jeanne Carter; Li Lin; Stacy T Lindau; Diana D Jeffery; Jennifer Barsky Reese; Bethanee J Schlosser; Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Stepped Skills: A team approach towards communication about sexuality and intimacy in cancer and palliative care.

Authors:  Hilde de Vocht; Amanda Hordern; Joy Notter; Harry van de Wiel
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2011-11-30

10.  Development of the NIH PROMIS ® Sexual Function and Satisfaction measures in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn E Flynn; Li Lin; Jill M Cyranowski; Bryce B Reeve; Jennifer Barsky Reese; Diana D Jeffery; Ashley Wilder Smith; Laura S Porter; Carrie B Dombeck; Deborah Watkins Bruner; Francis J Keefe; Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.