Literature DB >> 27657678

All your data (effectively) belong to us: data practices among direct-to-consumer genetic testing firms.

Linnea I Laestadius1, Jennifer R Rich1, Paul L Auer1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) has become a convenient method to help people to understand their genetic makeup. Owing in part to concerns regarding confidentiality, privacy, and secondary use of data, professional and government bodies created guidelines to promote transparency among these companies. Using a comprehensive and systematic approach, this study assessed DTC-GT company compliance with international transparency guidelines.
METHODS: A framework analysis was performed on 30 DTC-GT health and/or ancestry websites identified using a US-based online search strategy during the summer of 2015. A codebook was developed from a synthesis of relevant guidelines from seven DTC-GT guideline documents and applied to each website.
RESULTS: Although most companies met guidelines related to transparency regarding security protocols, storage procedures, and third-party disclosures, few met guidelines regarding sharing risks from data disclosures. Additionally, few companies disclosed how long data would be kept for services or research. Use of data for research was frequently mentioned only in privacy policies and terms of service documents, and only two-thirds of companies required an additional consent to use consumer data for health-related research.
CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that DTC-GT companies do not consistently meet international transparency guidelines related to confidentiality, privacy, and secondary use of data.Genet Med advance online publication 22 September 2016.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27657678     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  19 in total

Review 1.  Privacy challenges and research opportunities for genomic data sharing.

Authors:  Luca Bonomi; Yingxiang Huang; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Transparency of genetic testing services for 'health, wellness and lifestyle': analysis of online prepurchase information for UK consumers.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Hall; Rena Gertz; Joan Amato; Claudia Pagliari
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Public Attitudes Toward Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Grayson L Ruhl; James W Hazel; Ellen Wright Clayton; Bradley A Malin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

4.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the news: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Corey H Basch; Grace C Hillyer; Lalitha Samuel; Erela Datuowei; Betty Cohn
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-10-14

Review 5.  Considerations for developing regulations for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a scoping review using the 3-I framework.

Authors:  Alexandra Cernat; Naazish S Bashir; Wendy J Ungar
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-02-16

6.  WHY WE FEAR GENETIC INFORMANTS: USING GENETIC GENEALOGY TO CATCH SERIAL KILLERS.

Authors:  Teneille R Brown
Journal:  Columbia Sci Technol Law Rev       Date:  2019

7.  PAGEANT: personal access to genome and analysis of natural traits.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Zhi-Sheng Liang; Stefano Pallotti; Janice M Ranson; David J Llewellyn; Zhi-Jie Zheng; Daniel A King; Qiang Zhou; Houfeng Zheng; Valerio Napolioni
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Open sharing of genomic data: Who does it and why?

Authors:  Tobias Haeusermann; Bastian Greshake; Alessandro Blasimme; Darja Irdam; Martin Richards; Effy Vayena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Regulation of Internet-based Genetic Testing: Challenges for Australia and Other Jurisdictions.

Authors:  Jane Tiller; Paul Lacaze
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-02-15

10.  Medicine, market and communication: ethical considerations in regard to persuasive communication in direct-to-consumer genetic testing services.

Authors:  Manuel Schaper; Silke Schicktanz
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.