Literature DB >> 27657342

Second-line therapy after nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or after gemcitabine for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

E Gabriela Chiorean, Daniel D Von Hoff, Josep Tabernero, Robert El-Maraghi, Wen Wee Ma, Michele Reni, Marion Harris, Robert Whorf, Helen Liu, Jack Shiansong Li, Victoria Manax, Alfredo Romano, Brian Lu, David Goldstein.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27657342      PMCID: PMC5117797          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


× No keyword cloud information.
Correction to: British Journal of Cancer (2016) 115, 188–194. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.185; Published online 28 June 2016. Upon publication of the above paper in the British Journal of Cancer, the authors identified several errors in their manuscript and Supplementary Material. Table 3 contained minor rounding errors and was incorrectly formatted. The correct table has been reproduced below.
Table 3

Multivariate analyses of total OS, post-first-line OS, and survival time from the start of second-line therapy to death (OS2)

CovariateaHR (95% CI)P-value
Total OS (includes treated patients with or without a 2L therapy; n=741)
Treatment group (nab-P+Gem vs Gem alone)0.63 (0.54–0.74)<0.001
2L therapy (with vs without)0.50 (0.43–0.59)<0.001
NLR at baseline (⩽5 vs >5)0.59 (0.50–0.69)<0.001
KPS at baseline (70–80 vs 90–100)1.33 (1.13–1.55)<0.001
Presence of liver metastasis (yes vs no)1.50 (1.22–1.85)<0.001
CA19-9 level at baseline (continuous)1.16 (1.05–1.29)0.005
Age at baseline (<65 vs ⩾65 years)0.88 (0.75–1.02)0.089
Post-1L OS (includes treated patients with or without a 2L therapy; n=793)
Treatment group (nab-P+Gem vs Gem alone)0.73 (0.63–0.85)<0.001
2L therapy (with vs without)0.47 (0.40–0.54)<0.001
NLR at end of 1L (⩽5 vs >5)0.60 (0.52–0.70)<0.001
KPS at end of 1L  
 90–100 vs ⩽600.46 (0.37–0.57)<0.001
 70–80 vs ⩽600.57 (0.47–0.70)<0.001
PFS, months (⩾4.4 vs <4.4)b0.78 (0.67–0.91)0.002
Geographic region (North America vs others)0.86 (0.74–1.00)0.051
OS2 (only patients who received 2L therapy; n=346)
Number of metastatic sites1.15 (1.02–1.29)0.018
NLR at end of 1L (⩽5 vs >5)0.76 (0.60–0.97)0.027
KPS at end of 1L  
 90–100 vs ⩽600.53 (0.35–0.81)0.003
 70–80 vs ⩽600.66 (0.44–1.00)0.052

Abbreviations: CA19-9=carbohydrate antigen 19-9; Gem=gemcitabine; HR=hazard ratio; KPS=Karnofsky performance status; nab-P=nab-paclitaxel; NLR=neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PFS=progression-free survival; CI=confidence interval; OS=overall survival; 2L=second-line; 1L=first-line.

Covariates tested for each multivariate analysis are listed in the Materials and Methods section.

In this study, the median PFS for the entire intention-to-treat population was 4.4 months.

On page 5, the second sentence in the discussion section omitted a reference and contained a minor numerical error. The sentence should read: ‘Indeed, the median OS of patients in the nab-P+Gem group who received a 2L treatment was over 4 months longer than the median OS with nab-P+Gem in the ITT population (12.8 vs 8.7 months; Von Hoff ; Goldstein ) and over 6 months longer than the median OS with nab-P+Gem in patients who did not receive 2L therapy (12.8 vs 6.3 months).' Supplementary Figure 1 has been replaced in the original supplementary file list, with a number of values having been changed. The authors apologise for these oversights.
  2 in total

1.  nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer: long-term survival from a phase III trial.

Authors:  David Goldstein; Robert Hassan El-Maraghi; Pascal Hammel; Volker Heinemann; Volker Kunzmann; Javier Sastre; Werner Scheithauer; Salvatore Siena; Josep Tabernero; Luis Teixeira; Giampaolo Tortora; Jean-Luc Van Laethem; Rosemary Young; Darryl Neil Penenberg; Brian Lu; Alfredo Romano; Daniel D Von Hoff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine.

Authors:  Daniel D Von Hoff; Thomas Ervin; Francis P Arena; E Gabriela Chiorean; Jeffrey Infante; Malcolm Moore; Thomas Seay; Sergei A Tjulandin; Wen Wee Ma; Mansoor N Saleh; Marion Harris; Michele Reni; Scot Dowden; Daniel Laheru; Nathan Bahary; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Josep Tabernero; Manuel Hidalgo; David Goldstein; Eric Van Cutsem; Xinyu Wei; Jose Iglesias; Markus F Renschler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 91.245

  2 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Towards an optimal treatment algorithm for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA).

Authors:  M Uccello; M Moschetta; G Mak; T Alam; C Murias Henriquez; H-T Arkenau
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Combination Therapies and Drug Delivery Platforms in Combating Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Fan Lei; Xinyuan Xi; Surinder K Batra; Tatiana K Bronich
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 3.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Beyond first line, where are we?

Authors:  Sara Cherri; Silvia Noventa; Alberto Zaniboni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Performance status dynamics during treatment with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  E Gabriela Chiorean; Daniel Von Hoff; Yin Wan; Sandra Margunato-Debay; Marc Botteman; David Goldstein
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, a single institution experience.

Authors:  Danielle C Glassman; Randze L Palmaira; Christina M Covington; Avni M Desai; Geoffrey Y Ku; Jia Li; James J Harding; Anna M Varghese; Eileen M O'Reilly; Kenneth H Yu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Meta‑analysis of current chemotherapy regimens in advanced pancreatic cancer to prolong survival and reduce treatment‑associated toxicities.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Linli Chen; Jianping Yu; Yanmei Xu; Xiaohui Wang; Ziqian Zeng; Ning Liu; Fan Xu; Shu Yang
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.952

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.