Literature DB >> 27656870

Attentional capture by deviant sounds: A noncontingent form of auditory distraction?

François Vachon1, Katherine Labonté1, John E Marsh2.   

Abstract

The occurrence of an unexpected, infrequent sound in an otherwise homogeneous auditory background tends to disrupt the ongoing cognitive task. This "deviation effect" is typically explained in terms of attentional capture whereby the deviant sound draws attention away from the focal activity, regardless of the nature of this activity. Yet, there is theoretical and empirical evidence suggesting that the attention-capture mechanism underlying this form of distraction could rather be triggered in a task-contingent fashion. The present study aimed at determining whether the auditory deviation effect reflects the action of either a stimulus-driven or a task-contingent orienting mechanism. To do so, we conducted a systematic investigation whereby the impact of verbal deviants-a letter embedded in the repetition of another letter-and spatial deviants-a sound presented contralaterally to the other sounds-on verbal and spatial short-term memory (STM) was assessed. This study established that both verbal and spatial deviants can hinder both verbal and spatial order-reconstruction (Experiment 1) and missing-item tasks (Experiment 2). Such results demonstrate that the deviation effect reflects a general form of auditory distraction as interference took place both within and across domains and regardless of the processes engaged in the focal task. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27656870     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  13 in total

1.  The mechanisms of far transfer from cognitive training: specifying the role of distraction suppression.

Authors:  Annie Desmarais; François Vachon
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-03-29

2.  Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.

Authors:  Larissa Leist; Thomas Lachmann; Sabine J Schlittmeier; Markus Georgi; Maria Klatte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-10-03

3.  Cognitive Load Does Not Affect the Behavioral and Cognitive Foundations of Social Cooperation.

Authors:  Laura Mieth; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-31

4.  Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Laura Mieth; Jan Philipp Röer; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Auditory salience using natural soundscapes.

Authors:  Nicholas Huang; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell; François Vachon; Paul J Taylor; Robert W Hughes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Positive and negative mood states do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction in the serial-recall paradigm.

Authors:  Saskia Kaiser; Axel Buchner; Raoul Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Auditory salience using natural scenes: An online study.

Authors:  Sandeep Reddy Kothinti; Nicholas Huang; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Monetary incentives have only limited effects on auditory distraction: evidence for the automaticity of cross-modal attention capture.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Laura Mieth; Axel Buchner; Jan Philipp Röer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-12-19

10.  The metacognition of auditory distraction: Judgments about the effects of deviating and changing auditory distractors on cognitive performance.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Laura Mieth; Jan Philipp Röer; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.