| Literature DB >> 27656627 |
Yunus Turgay Erten1, Turker Sahinkaya1, Engin Dinc1, Bekir Eray Kilinc2, Bulent Bayraktar1, Mehmet Kurtoglu1.
Abstract
In this study, we explained the effects of compression garment and electrostimulation on athletes' recovery period by evaluating blood lactate and isokinetic peak torque parameters. Twenty volunteers (15.55± 0.51 yr) were included to study. At recovery period, blood samples was taken for lactate values at 0th, 3rd, 5th, 15th, 30th min. The isokinetic strength test was performed on right ankle at 15th min and on the left ankle at 30th min. The same protocol was performed for compression garment on 2 weeks and for electrostimulation on third weeks and results were compared. There wasn't any significant difference on blood lactate levels within groups. At women; there was not any significant difference on isokinetic peak torques within two groups. but at electro-stimulation usage we found significant increases on right plantar flexion (P<0.1), right dorsal flexion (RDF) (P<0.1) and left plantar flexion (LPF) (P<0.1) values compared to control measurements. At men; with compression garment usage, there was significant increase on LPF values compared to control measurements. At electrostimulation usage, we found significant increases on RDF (P<0.1) and left dorsal flexion (P<0.1) values compared to control measurements. During recovery, there is not any beneficial effect seen on blood lactate level within two groups. When compared to passive rest, compression garments and electrostimulation interventions effects on force generation capacity at recovery are statically significant. Also in terms of force generation capacity; usage of electrostimulation during 15 min and compression garments during 30 min were statically more significant.Entities:
Keywords: Compression garments; Electrostimulation; Muscle soreness; Recovery period of exercise
Year: 2016 PMID: 27656627 PMCID: PMC5031375 DOI: 10.12965/jer.1632632.316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exerc Rehabil ISSN: 2288-176X
Fig. 1Isokinetic test.
Blood lactat values (mmol/L)
| Recovery period (min) | Control | Garment | Electrositimulation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0th | 3.08±1.19 | 2.70±1.03 | 3.37±1.47 |
| 3th | 2.10±0.49 | 3.12±1.19 | 2.33±0.75 |
| 5th | 1.83±0.43 | 2.68±0.89 | 1.87±0.43 |
| 15th | 2.37±1.88 | 2.11±0.42 | 1.94±0.47 |
| 30th | 2.07±0.60 | 2.39±0.67 | 2.59±0.76 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
Comparison control group with garment group in isokinetic power (n=20)
| Voluntary contraction | Control | Garment | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RPF | |||
| Peak | 120 | 127.3 | 0.017 |
| %BW | 181.3 | 192.65 | 0.018 |
|
| |||
| RDF | |||
| Peak | 40.5 | 41.6 | 0.265 |
| %BW | 61.15 | 63.7 | 0.184 |
|
| |||
| LPF | |||
| Peak | 122 | 128.3 | 0.009 |
| %BW | 184.55 | 194.75 | 0.01 |
|
| |||
| LDF | |||
| Peak | 41.9 | 42.65 | 0.583 |
| %BW | 63.65 | 65.7 | 0.216 |
RPF, right plantar flexion maximal voluntary contraction; RDF, right dorsal flexion maximal voluntary contraction; LPF, left plantar flexion maximal voluntary contraction; LDF, left dorsal flexion maximal voluntary contraction; BW, body weight.
Comparison control group with electrostimulation group in isokinetic power (n=20)
| Voluntary contraction | Control | Garment | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RPF | |||
| Peak | 120 | 135.65 | 0.001 |
| %BW | 181.3 | 206.7 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| RDF | |||
| Peak | 40.5 | 42.85 | 0.016 |
| %BW | 61.15 | 65.35 | 0.004 |
|
| |||
| LPF | |||
| Peak | 122 | 136.65 | 0.001 |
| %BW | 184.55 | 208.2 | 0.001 |
|
| |||
| LDF | |||
| Peak | 41.9 | 43.05 | 0.367 |
| %BW | 63.65 | 65.35 | 0.391 |
RPF, right plantar flexion maximal voluntary contraction; RDF, right dorsal flexion maximal voluntary contraction; LPF, left plantar flexion maximal voluntary contraction; LDF, left dorsal flexion maximal voluntary contraction; BW, body weight.