Literature DB >> 17685701

Effects of different recovery interventions on anaerobic performances following preseason soccer training.

Antonio Tessitore1, Romain Meeusen, Cristina Cortis, Laura Capranica.   

Abstract

In the preseason soccer training, morning and afternoon training sessions often are scheduled daily. The high frequency of training sessions could place heavy strain on biological systems, and it is necessary to apply proper recovery strategies for improving the players' capability to regain an adequate working state for subsequent training units. However, the effect of recovery interventions following soccer training units is debatable, due to a lack of studies performed in field situations. The aim of this study was to examine, during a 21-day preseason soccer training, the most effective recovery intervention (i.e., passive, dry-aerobic exercises, water-aerobic exercises, electrostimulation) on anaerobic performances (i.e., squat jump, countermovement jump, bounce jumping, and 10-m sprint) and subjective ratings (i.e., perceived exertion and muscle pain), with the conditions before the intervention controlled and standardized. Twelve young (age: 18.1 +/- 1.2 years) elite soccer players participated. Data were collected on 4 occasions 2 days apart and at the same time of the day. Activity and dietary intake were replicated on each occasion. After baseline measurements, participants performed a standardized training during which their heart rates and ratings of perceived exertion were recorded. This was followed by a 20-minute recovery intervention. After a 5-hour rest, athletes' ratings of muscle pain were recorded prior to a second test session. There were no significant differences in exercise intensities and baseline anaerobic performances. Significantly (p < 0.01) better performances were observed in the afternoon. Although no main effect of recovery intervention was observed on anaerobic performances, dry-aerobic exercises (0.6 +/- 0.9) and electrostimulation (0.6 +/- 1.2) were more beneficial (p < 0.01) than water-aerobic exercises (2.1 +/- 1.1) and passive rest (2.1 +/- 1.7) for reducing muscle pain, which could affect the player's working ability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17685701     DOI: 10.1519/R-20386.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  19 in total

1.  The physiological effects of low-intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on short-term recovery from supra-maximal exercise bouts in male triathletes.

Authors:  J K Malone; G F Coughlan; L Crowe; G C Gissane; B Caulfield
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  The Transition Period in Soccer: A Window of Opportunity.

Authors:  Joao Renato Silva; Joao Brito; Richard Akenhead; George P Nassis
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Comparison of active and electrostimulated recovery strategies after fatiguing exercise.

Authors:  Marc Vanderthommen; Souleyma Makrof; Christophe Demoulin
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 4.  Does electrical stimulation enhance post-exercise performance recovery?

Authors:  Nicolas Babault; Carole Cometti; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Gaëlle Deley
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Comparison of recovery strategies on maximal force-generating capacity and electromyographic activity level of the knee extensor muscles.

Authors:  Nidhal Zarrouk; Haithem Rebai; Abdelmoneem Yahia; Nizar Souissi; François Hug; Mohamed Dogui
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation via the peroneal nerve is superior to graduated compression socks in reducing perceived muscle soreness following intense intermittent endurance exercise.

Authors:  Richard A Ferguson; Matthew J Dodd; Victoria R Paley
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Water immersion recovery for athletes: effect on exercise performance and practical recommendations.

Authors:  Nathan G Versey; Shona L Halson; Brian T Dawson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Recovery in soccer : part ii-recovery strategies.

Authors:  Mathieu Nédélec; Alan McCall; Chris Carling; Franck Legall; Serge Berthoin; Gregory Dupont
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Comparison between cold water immersion therapy (CWIT) and light emitting diode therapy (LEDT) in short-term skeletal muscle recovery after high-intensity exercise in athletes--preliminary results.

Authors:  Ernesto Cesar Leal Junior; Vanessa de Godoi; José Luis Mancalossi; Rafael Paolo Rossi; Thiago De Marchi; Márcio Parente; Douglas Grosselli; Rafael Abeche Generosi; Maira Basso; Lucio Frigo; Shaiane Silva Tomazoni; Jan Magnus Bjordal; Rodrigo Alvaro Brandão Lopes-Martins
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  The effect of immediate post-training active and passive recovery interventions on anaerobic performance and lower limb flexibility in professional soccer players.

Authors:  Ezequiel Rey; Carlos Lago-Peñas; Luis Casáis; Joaquín Lago-Ballesteros
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.