| Literature DB >> 27656237 |
Jiaxing Tian1, Fengmei Lian2, Xiaotong Yu3, Yashan Cui4, Tianyu Zhao5, Yang Cao3, Xiaolin Tong2.
Abstract
Background. The study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal decoction in treating outpatients with T2DM. Methods. All patients enrolled received decoction for at least 6 months. The primary outcome was the control rate of HbA1c and the change in HbA1c. FPG, 2hPG, HOMA-IR, and HOMA-β were also collected and evaluated. Results. The control rates after treatment at months 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 60 were 45.07%, 52.78%, 47.22%, 45.83%, 50.00%, 57.14%, and 40.00%. Multiple linear regression showed the change of HbA1c has a significant relationship with the baseline HbA1c and duration of DM and BMI (p < 0.05). Both FPG and 2hPG levels significantly decreased compared to the baseline (p < 0.05). Chinese herbal decoction also improved islet cell function with decreased HOMA-IR and increased HOMA-β (p < 0.05). 19 and 4 subjects deactivated the antidiabetes drugs or insulin, respectively, after taking decoction. One subject developed DKD and one developed DPN, and another subject showed abnormal liver function which was irrelevant to decoction treatment. Conclusions. Chinese herbal decoction significantly enhanced the hypoglycemic action and had certain effect on protecting islet cell function. As a candidate diabetes therapy, it may reduce the use of antidiabetes drugs and slow the progression to diabetes complications.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27656237 PMCID: PMC5021493 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5473015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Characteristics of study subjects at baseline.
| Chinese herbal decoction ( | |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 50.54 ± 12.23 |
| Gender (M/F) | 59.86%/40.14% |
| Height (m) | 1.68 ± 0.08 |
| Weight (kg) | 72.00 ± 12.56 |
| Duration of diabetes (month) | 72.96 ± 63.45 |
| Duration of treatment (month) | 21.88 ± 18.05 |
| Times of therapy ( | 11.90 ± 7.77 |
| History of hypertension ( | 59 (41.55%) |
| History of dyslipidemia ( | 65 (45.77%) |
| History of fatty liver ( | 32 (22.54%) |
| History of hyperuricemia ( | 8 (5.63%) |
| Combined with insulin ( | 29 (20.42%) |
| Combined with metformin ( | 37 (26.06%) |
| Combined with repaglinide ( | 14 (9.86%) |
| Combined with gliclazide ( | 8 (5.63%) |
| Combined with glimepiride ( | 5 (3.52%) |
| Combined with acarbose ( | 24 (16.90%) |
| Combined with rosiglitazone ( | 4 (2.82%) |
| HbA1c (%) | 8.98 ± 2.02 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 9.96 ± 2.94 |
| 2hPG (mmol/L) | 14.07 ± 4.90 |
| CHO (mmol/L) | 5.43 ± 1.19 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.71 ± 2.72 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 3.17 ± 0.97 |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.26 ± 0.43 |
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 134.71 ± 20.51 |
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 83.94 ± 9.68 |
| UA ( | 315.81 ± 118.73 |
| ALT (U) | 37.42 ± 47.11 |
| AST (U) | 25.58 ± 14.75 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
Figure 1Subjects achieving HbA1c targets (a) and glycated hemoglobin (b) over time. ∗ < 0.05 and ∗∗ < 0.01.
Factors influencing HbA1c control of patients.
|
| SE | Standardized regression coefficients |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HbA1c at baseline | 0.165 | 0.020 | 0.562 | 8.226 | 0.000 |
| Duration of diabetes | 0.268 | 0.054 | 0.328 | 4.978 | 0.000 |
| BMI | 0.011 | 0.002 | 0.130 | 4.783 | 0.000 |
| Age | 0.113 | 1.583 | 0.116 | 0.151 | 0.063 |
Figure 2Fasting plasma glucose (a), 2-h postprandial glucose (b), fasting insulin (c), fasting C-peptide (d), HOMA insulin resistance (e), and β-cell function (f) over time. ∗ < 0.05 and ∗∗ < 0.01.
Figure 3Total cholesterol (a), triglycerides (b), low-density lipoprotein (c), high-density lipoprotein (d), systolic blood pressure (e), and diastolic blood pressure (f) over time. ∗ < 0.05 and ∗∗ < 0.01.