Literature DB >> 27655852

Factors Associated With the Increasing Rates of Discharges Directly Home From Intensive Care Units-A Direct From ICU Sent Home Study.

Vincent I Lau1, Fran A Priestap1, Joyce N H Lam1, Ian M Ball1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between rates of discharge directly to home (DDH) from the intensive care unit (ICU) and bed availability (ward and ICU). Also to identify patient characteristics that make them candidates for safe DDH and describe transfer delay impact on length of stay (LOS).
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all adult patients who survived their stay in our medical-surgical-trauma ICU between April 2003 and March 2015.
RESULTS: Median age was 49 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 33.5-60.4), and the majority of the patients were males (54.8%). Median number of preexisting comorbidities was 5 (IQR: 2-7) diagnoses. Discharge directly to home increased from 28 (3.1% of all survivors) patients in 2003 to 120 (12.5%) patients in 2014. The mean annual rate of DDH was between 11% and 12% over the last 6 years. Approximately 62% (n = 397) of patients waited longer than 4 hours for a ward bed, with a median delay of 2.0 days (IQR: 0.5-4.7) before being DDH. There was an inverse correlation between ICU occupancy and DDH rates ( rP = -.55, P < .0001, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.36 to -0.69, R2 = .29). There was no correlation with ward occupancy and DDH rates ( rs = -.055, P = .64, 95% CI = -0.25 to 0.21).
CONCLUSIONS: The DDH rates have been increasing over time at our institution and were inversely correlated with ICU bed occupancy but were not associated with ward occupancy. The DDH patients are young, have few comorbidities on admission, and few discharge diagnoses, which are usually reversible single system problems with low disease burden. Transfers to the ward are delayed in a majority of cases, leading to increased ICU LOS and likely increased overall hospital LOS as well.

Entities:  

Keywords:  demographics; discharge; home; intensive care unit; length of stay; occupancy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27655852     DOI: 10.1177/0885066616668483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0885-0666            Impact factor:   3.510


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of the Safety of Discharging Select Patients Directly Home From the Intensive Care Unit: A Multicenter Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Henry T Stelfox; Andrea Soo; Daniel J Niven; Kirsten M Fiest; Hannah Wunsch; Kathryn M Rowan; Sean M Bagshaw
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Risk Factors for 1-Year Mortality and Hospital Utilization Patterns in Critical Care Survivors: A Retrospective, Observational, Population-Based Data Linkage Study.

Authors:  Tamas Szakmany; Angharad M Walters; Richard Pugh; Ceri Battle; Damon M Berridge; Ronan A Lyons
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 3.  Lessons learned and new directions regarding Discharge Direct from Adult Intensive Care Units Sent Home (DISH): A narrative review.

Authors:  John Basmaji; Vincent Lau; Joyce Lam; Fran Priestap; Ian M Ball
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2018-09-20

4.  Factors Affecting Discharge to Home of Medical Patients Treated in an Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Takayuki Shimogai; Kazuhiro P Izawa; Minoru Kawada; Akira Kuriyama
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Patient discharge from intensive care: an updated scoping review to identify tools and practices to inform high-quality care.

Authors:  Kara M Plotnikoff; Karla D Krewulak; Laura Hernández; Krista Spence; Nadine Foster; Shelly Longmore; Sharon E Straus; Daniel J Niven; Jeanna Parsons Leigh; Henry T Stelfox; Kirsten M Fiest
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.