Henry T Stelfox1,2,3,4, Andrea Soo1,4, Daniel J Niven1,2,3,4, Kirsten M Fiest1,2,3,5, Hannah Wunsch6,7, Kathryn M Rowan8, Sean M Bagshaw9,10. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 2. Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 3. O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 4. Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 5. Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 6. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 7. Department of Anesthesia and Interdisciplinary Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 8. Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC), London, England. 9. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 10. Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
Importance: The safety of discharging adult patients recovering from critical illness directly home from the intensive care unit (ICU) is unknown. Objective: To compare the health care utilization and clinical outcomes for ICU patients discharged directly home from the ICU with those of patients discharged home via the hospital ward. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective population-based cohort study of adult patients admitted to the ICU of 9 medical-surgical hospitals from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2016, with 1-year follow-up after hospital discharge. All adult ICU patients were discharged home alive from hospital, and the propensity score matched cohort (1:1) was based on patient characteristics, therapies received in the ICU, and hospital characteristics. Exposures: Patient disposition on discharge from the ICU: directly home vs home via the hospital ward. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was readmission to the hospital within 30 days of hospital discharge. The secondary outcomes were emergency department visit within 30 days and death within 1 year. Results: Among the 6732 patients included in the study, 2826 (42%) were female; median age, 56 years (interquartile range, 41-67 years); 922 (14%) were discharged directly home, with significant variation found between hospitals (range, 4.4%-44.0%). Compared with patients discharged home via the hospital ward, patients discharged directly home were younger (median age 47 vs 57 years; P < .001), more likely to be admitted with a diagnosis of overdose, substance withdrawal, seizures, or metabolic coma (32% [295] vs 10% [594]; P < .001), to have a lower severity of acute illness on ICU admission (median APACHE II score 15 vs 18; P < .001), and receive less than 48 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation (42% [389] vs 34% [1984]; P < .001). In the propensity score matched cohort (n = 1632), patients discharged directly home had similar length of ICU stay (median, 3.1 days vs 3.0 days; P = .42) but significantly shorter length of hospital stay (median, 3.3 days vs 9.2 days; P < .001) compared with patients discharged home via the hospital ward. There were no significant differences between patients discharged directly home or home via the hospital ward for readmission to the hospital (10% [n = 81] vs 11% [n = 92]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.64-1.20) or emergency department visit (25% [n = 200] vs 26% [n = 212]; HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.09) within 30 days of hospital discharge. Four percent of patients in both groups died within 1 year of hospital discharge (n = 31 and n = 34 in the discharged directly home and discharged home via the hospital ward groups, respectively) (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.60-1.35). Conclusions and Relevance: The discharge of select adult patients directly home from the ICU is common, and it is not associated with increased health care utilization or increased mortality.
Importance: The safety of discharging adult patients recovering from critical illness directly home from the intensive care unit (ICU) is unknown. Objective: To compare the health care utilization and clinical outcomes for ICU patients discharged directly home from the ICU with those of patients discharged home via the hospital ward. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective population-based cohort study of adult patients admitted to the ICU of 9 medical-surgical hospitals from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2016, with 1-year follow-up after hospital discharge. All adult ICU patients were discharged home alive from hospital, and the propensity score matched cohort (1:1) was based on patient characteristics, therapies received in the ICU, and hospital characteristics. Exposures: Patient disposition on discharge from the ICU: directly home vs home via the hospital ward. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was readmission to the hospital within 30 days of hospital discharge. The secondary outcomes were emergency department visit within 30 days and death within 1 year. Results: Among the 6732 patients included in the study, 2826 (42%) were female; median age, 56 years (interquartile range, 41-67 years); 922 (14%) were discharged directly home, with significant variation found between hospitals (range, 4.4%-44.0%). Compared with patients discharged home via the hospital ward, patients discharged directly home were younger (median age 47 vs 57 years; P < .001), more likely to be admitted with a diagnosis of overdose, substance withdrawal, seizures, or metabolic coma (32% [295] vs 10% [594]; P < .001), to have a lower severity of acute illness on ICU admission (median APACHE II score 15 vs 18; P < .001), and receive less than 48 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation (42% [389] vs 34% [1984]; P < .001). In the propensity score matched cohort (n = 1632), patients discharged directly home had similar length of ICU stay (median, 3.1 days vs 3.0 days; P = .42) but significantly shorter length of hospital stay (median, 3.3 days vs 9.2 days; P < .001) compared with patients discharged home via the hospital ward. There were no significant differences between patients discharged directly home or home via the hospital ward for readmission to the hospital (10% [n = 81] vs 11% [n = 92]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.64-1.20) or emergency department visit (25% [n = 200] vs 26% [n = 212]; HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.09) within 30 days of hospital discharge. Four percent of patients in both groups died within 1 year of hospital discharge (n = 31 and n = 34 in the discharged directly home and discharged home via the hospital ward groups, respectively) (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.60-1.35). Conclusions and Relevance: The discharge of select adult patients directly home from the ICU is common, and it is not associated with increased health care utilization or increased mortality.
Authors: Sanjay Chawla; Rhonda L D'Agostino; Stephen M Pastores; Raghukumar Thirumala; Natalie Kostelecky; Joanne F Chou; Howard T Thaler; Neil A Halpern Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2012-08-16 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Jason H Wasfy; Corwin Matthew Zigler; Christine Choirat; Yun Wang; Francesca Dominici; Robert W Yeh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2016-12-27 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Joyce Nga Hei Lam; Vincent I Lau; Fran A Priestap; John Basmaji; Ian M Ball Journal: J Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 3.510
Authors: Henry T Stelfox; Jeanna Parsons Leigh; Peter M Dodek; Alexis F Turgeon; Alan J Forster; Francois Lamontagne; Rob A Fowler; Andrea Soo; Sean M Bagshaw Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Nazir I Lone; Michael A Gillies; Catriona Haddow; Richard Dobbie; Kathryn M Rowan; Sarah H Wild; Gordon D Murray; Timothy S Walsh Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Samiha Mohsen; Stephana J Moss; Filipe Lucini; Karla D Krewulak; Henry T Stelfox; Daniel J Niven; Khara M Sauro; Kirsten M Fiest Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2022-08-26 Impact factor: 9.296
Authors: Sean M Bagshaw; Danny J Zuege; Henry T Stelfox; Dawn Opgenorth; Tracy Wasylak; Nancy Fraser; Thanh X Nguyen Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 9.296
Authors: Henry T Stelfox; Rebecca Brundin-Mather; Andrea Soo; Jeanna Parsons Leigh; Daniel J Niven; Kirsten M Fiest; Christopher James Doig; Danny J Zuege; Barry Kushner; Fiona Clement; Sharon E Straus; Deborah J Cook; Sean M Bagshaw; Khara M Sauro Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Sean M Bagshaw; Dat T Tran; Dawn Opgenorth; Xiaoming Wang; Danny J Zuege; Armann Ingolfsson; Henry T Stelfox; Nguyen X Thanh Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-08-03
Authors: Brianna K Rosgen; Kara M Plotnikoff; Karla D Krewulak; Anmol Shahid; Laura Hernandez; Bonnie G Sept; Jeanna Morrissey; Kristin Robertson; Nancy Fraser; Daniel J Niven; Sharon E Straus; Jeanna Parsons Leigh; Henry T Stelfox; Kirsten M Fiest Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-01-02 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Kara M Plotnikoff; Karla D Krewulak; Laura Hernández; Krista Spence; Nadine Foster; Shelly Longmore; Sharon E Straus; Daniel J Niven; Jeanna Parsons Leigh; Henry T Stelfox; Kirsten M Fiest Journal: Crit Care Date: 2021-12-17 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Kyla N Brown; Andrea Soo; Peter Faris; Scott B Patten; Kirsten M Fiest; Henry T Stelfox Journal: Crit Care Date: 2020-07-31 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Christina I Collins; Tasneem F Hasan; Lesia H Mooney; Jessica L Talbot; Amanda L Fouraker; Katherine F Nelson; MaryAnn Ohanian; Stephanie L Bonnett; Rabih G Tawk; Lisa M Nordan; David O Hodge; Robert S Kaplan; Benjamin L Thiemann; Meredith Karney; William D Freeman Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Date: 2020-06-05
Authors: Colin Casault; Andrea Soo; Chel Hee Lee; Philippe Couillard; Daniel Niven; Tom Stelfox; Kirsten Fiest Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 2.692