Literature DB >> 27655805

ANOVA model for network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data.

Victoria N Nyaga1,2, Marc Aerts2, Marc Arbyn1.   

Abstract

Procedures combining and summarising direct and indirect evidence from independent studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of different tests for the same disease are referred to network meta-analysis. Network meta-analysis provides a unified inference framework and uses the data more efficiently. Nonetheless, handling the inherent correlation between sensitivity and specificity continues to be a statistical challenge. We developed an arm-based hierarchical model which expresses the logit transformed sensitivity and specificity as the sum of fixed effects for test, correlated study-effects to model the inherent correlation between sensitivity and specificity and a random error associated with various tests evaluated in a given study. We present the accuracy of 11 tests used to triage women with minor cervical lesions to detect cervical precancer. Finally, we compare the results with those from a contrast-based model which expresses the linear predictor as a contrast to a comparator test. The proposed arm-based model is more appealing than the contrast-based model since the former permits more straightforward interpretation of the parameters, makes use of all available data yielding shorter credible intervals, and models more natural variance-covariance matrix structures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meta-analysis; arm-based; diagnostic tests; hierarchical model; network meta-analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27655805     DOI: 10.1177/0962280216669182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  21 in total

1.  Comparative diagnostic accuracy of respective nuclear imaging for suspected fracture-related infection: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qingyu Zhang; Jinlei Dong; Yelong Shen; Canhua Yun; Dongsheng Zhou; Fanxiao Liu
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Meta-Analysis Methods of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies.

Authors:  Niki Dimou; Pantelis Bagos
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Enamel Caries Detection and Diagnosis: An Analysis of Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  T Walsh; R Macey; D Ricketts; A Carrasco Labra; H Worthington; A J Sutton; S Freeman; A M Glenny; P Riley; J Clarkson; E Cerullo
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 4.  Detecting Rotator Cuff Tears: A Network Meta-analysis of 144 Diagnostic Studies.

Authors:  Fanxiao Liu; Jinlei Dong; Wun-Jer Shen; Qinglin Kang; Dongsheng Zhou; Fei Xiong
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-02-05

5.  National adoption of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy: the Italian VATS register evaluation.

Authors:  Duilio Divisi; Luca Bertolaccini; Mirko Barone; Dario Amore; Desideria Argnani; Gino Zaccagna; Piergiorgio Solli; Gaetano Di Rienzo; Carlo Curcio; Roberto Crisci
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of five common tumour biomarkers and CA19-9 for pancreatic cancer: a protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

Authors:  Long Ge; Bei Pan; Fujian Song; Jichun Ma; Dena Zeraatkar; Jianguo Zhou; Jinhui Tian
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  F-18 FDG PET, CT, and MRI for detecting the malignant potential in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

Authors:  Kongyuan Wei; Bei Pan; Huan Yang; Cuncun Lu; Long Ge; Nong Cao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  CT, MRI, and F-18 FDG PET for the detection of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Jinman Ni; Kongyuan Wei; Jinhui Tian; Shaobo Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing comparative test accuracy questions.

Authors:  Mariska M G Leeflang; Johannes B Reitsma
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2018-09-10

10.  Proteomic profiling and identification of significant markers from high-grade osteosarcoma after cryotherapy and irradiation.

Authors:  Rashmi Madda; Chao-Ming Chen; Jir-You Wang; Cheng-Fong Chen; Kuang-Yu Chao; Yu-Min Yang; Hsin-Yi Wu; Wei-Ming Chen; Po-Kuei Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.