Literature DB >> 27654046

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Fibular Motion After Fixation of Syndesmotic Injuries With a Screw or Suture-Button Construct.

Jeremy M LaMothe1, Josh R Baxter2, Conor Murphy3, Susannah Gilbert4, Bridget DeSandis5, Mark C Drakos6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Suture-button constructs are an alternative to screw fixation for syndesmotic injuries, and proponents advocate that suture-button constructs may allow physiological motion of the syndesmosis. Recent biomechanical data suggest that fibular instability with syndesmotic injuries is greatest in the sagittal plane, but the design of a suture-button construct, being a rope and 2 retention washers, is most effective along the axis of the rope (in the coronal plane). Some studies report that suture-button constructs are able to constrain fibular motion in the coronal plane, but the ability of a tightrope to constrain sagittal fibular motion is unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess fibular motion in response to an external rotation stress test in a syndesmotic injury model after fixation with a screw or suture-button constructs.
METHODS: Eleven fresh-frozen cadaver whole legs with intact tibia-fibula articulations were secured to a custom fixture. Fibular motion (coronal, sagittal, and rotational planes) in response to a 6.5-Nm external rotation moment applied to the foot was recorded with fluoroscopy and a high-resolution motion capture system. Measures were taken for the following syndesmotic conditions: intact, complete lateral injury, complete lateral and deltoid injury, repair with a tetracortical 4.0-mm screw, and repair with a suture button construct (Tightrope; Arthrex, Naples, FL) aimed from the lateral fibula to the anterior medial malleolus.
RESULTS: The suture-button construct allowed significantly more sagittal plane motion than the syndesmotic screw. Measurements acquired with mortise imaging did not detect differences between the intact, lateral injury, and 2 repair conditions. External rotation of the fibula was significantly increased in both injury conditions and was not restored to intact levels with the screw or the suture-button construct.
CONCLUSION: A single suture-button placed from the lateral fibula to the anterior medial malleolus was unable to replicate the motion observed in the intact specimen when subjected to an external rotation stress test and allowed significantly more posterior motion of the fibula than when fixed with a screw in simulated highly unstable injuries. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Fixation of a syndesmotic injury with a single suture-button construct did not restore physiological fibular motion, which may have implications for postoperative care and clinical outcomes.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle; injury; screw; suture-button construct; syndesmosis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27654046     DOI: 10.1177/1071100716666865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  10 in total

1.  Anatomic Syndesmotic and Deltoid Ligament Reconstruction with Flexible Implants: A Technique Description.

Authors:  Christina J Hajewski; Kyle Duchman; Jessica Goetz; John Femino
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

2.  Biomechanics comparison between endobutton fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for syndesmotic injury ankle fracture; a finite element analysis and cadaveric validation study.

Authors:  Papangkorn Meekaew; Permsak Paholpak; Taweechok Wisanuyotin; Winai Sirichativapee; Wilasinee Sirichativapee; Weerachai Kosuwon; Yuichi Kasai
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-05

3.  The arthroscopic syndesmotic assessment tool can differentiate between stable and unstable ankle syndesmoses.

Authors:  Bart Lubberts; Daniel Guss; Bryan G Vopat; Anne H Johnson; C Niek van Dijk; Hang Lee; Christopher W DiGiovanni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Biomechanics of the Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis: A Systematic Review of Cadaveric Studies.

Authors:  Pranav Khambete; Ethan Harlow; Jason Ina; Shana Miskovsky
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2021-06-04

5.  Hybrid Fixation Restores Tibiofibular Kinematics for Early Weightbearing After Syndesmotic Injury.

Authors:  Neel K Patel; Calvin Chan; Conor I Murphy; Richard E Debski; Volker Musahl; MaCalus V Hogan
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-09-09

6.  Sagittal instability with inversion is important to evaluate after syndesmosis injury and repair: a cadaveric robotic study.

Authors:  Neel K Patel; Conor I Murphy; Thomas R Pfeiffer; Jan-Hendrik Naendrup; Jason P Zlotnicki; Richard E Debski; MaCalus V Hogan; Volker Musahl
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2020-03-30

7.  Diagnostic capability of dynamic ultrasound evaluation of supination-external rotation ankle injuries: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Cara L Fisher; Tebyan Rabbani; Katelyn Johnson; Rustin Reeves; Addison Wood
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Syndesmotic malreduction may decrease fixation stability: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Lu Bai; Wentao Zhang; Siyao Guan; Jianxin Liu; Peng Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Four-Dimensional CT Analysis of Normal Syndesmotic Motion.

Authors:  Murray T Wong; Charmaine Wiens; Jeremy Lamothe; W Brent Edwards; Prism S Schneider
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.827

10.  Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Syndesmosis Repair Techniques With Suture Button Implants.

Authors:  Andrew S Parker; David P Beason; Jonathan S Slowik; Jefferson B Sabatini; Norman E Waldrop
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-10-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.