| Literature DB >> 27654003 |
Sheng-Jian Dong1, Xiao-Jun Cai2, Shu-Jin Li1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) based treatment is the standard therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), but the development of chemoresistance is inevitable. Increasing evidence shows that dysregulation of microRNAs (miRNAs) is involved in malignant transformation. Thus, it is imperative that we find new diagnostic and prognostic marker for chemotherapy in CRC. MATERIAL AND METHODS For clinical parameter analysis, 78 CRC tissues and adjacent normal tissues and 45 serum specimens from CRC patients were included in this study. For chemo-response analysis, 116 primary tissues were collected from the patients receiving first-line 5-FU treatment. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to detect microRNAs expression. RESULTS The expression of miR-429 was significantly increased in both serum and primary tissues from CRC patients, and enhanced miR-429 level was associated with tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and TNM stage. The diagnostic and prognostic values were also confirmed in CRC by using primary tissues. For patients receiving 5-FU-based treatment, miR-429 levels were significantly lower in responding group. The proportions of patients that did not experience response to therapy were higher in primary tumors with high miR-429 expression levels as compared with primary tumors with low miR-429 expression levels. Finally, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that miR-429 is an independent prognostic indicator for chemo-response to 5-FU therapy among CRC patients. CONCLUSIONS High level of miR-429 expression was correlated with enhanced malignant potential and poor prognosis of CRC patients. Furthermore, miR-429 could affect the chemo-sensitivity of CRC patients to 5-FU therapy and was associated with poor response to 5-FU-based chemotherapy in patients with CRC.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27654003 PMCID: PMC5036382 DOI: 10.12659/msm.900674
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1MiR-429 expression was significantly increased in CRC serum and primary tissues. (A) miR-429 expression was significantly increased in CRC primary tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues. (B) 60.3% (47 of 78) cases had at least 2-fold higher expression of miR-429 in the CRC tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues. (C) The expression of miR-429 was significantly increased in serum of CRC patients compared with healthy individuals.
Clinical characteristics of 78 patients and the expression of miR-429 in CRC tissues.
| Factors | Case | MiR-429 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.826 | ||
| Male | 49 | 4.81 (1.12–8.65) | |
| Female | 29 | 4.98 (1.24–7.87) | |
| Age(years) | 0.537 | ||
| <60 | 43 | 4.64 (1.24–6.77) | |
| ≥60 | 35 | 4.99 (1.26–7.71) | |
| Tumor size | 0.036 | ||
| <6 cm | 49 | 3.89 (1.24–7.23) | |
| ≥6 cm | 29 | 5.02 (2.26–8.98) | |
| Tumor location | 0.198 | ||
| Colon | 37 | 4.64 (1.45–7.46) | |
| Rectum | 41 | 5.05 (2.12–7.77) | |
| Differentiation | 0.218 | ||
| Well | 27 | 4.77 (1.45–6.65) | |
| Moderate | 33 | 4.56 (2.30–7.10) | |
| Poor | 18 | 5.32 (3.11–8.17) | |
| Local invasion | 0.063 | ||
| T1–T2 | 27 | 4.38 (1.12–7.65) | |
| T3–T4 | 51 | 4.99 (2.98–8.76) | |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.001 | ||
| No | 42 | 3.36 (1.26–7.38) | |
| Yes | 36 | 5.71 (3.31–8.78) | |
| Distant metastasis | 0.000 | ||
| No | 71 | 3.56 (1.38–7.02) | |
| Yes | 7 | 5.56 (2.99–8.98) | |
| TNM stage | |||
| I–II | 42 | 3.32 (1.26–6.15) | 0.000 |
| III–IV | 36 | 5.98 (2.78–8.43) | |
Clinical characteristics of 45 patients and the expression of miR-429 in CRC serum.
| Factors | Case | MiR-429 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.904 | ||
| Male | 32 | 4.21 (1.15–7.91) | |
| Female | 13 | 4.53 (1.26–8.01) | |
| Age(years) | 0.772 | ||
| <60 | 30 | 4.24 (2.11–7.12) | |
| ≥60 | 15 | 4.57 (1.01–7.87) | |
| Tumor size | 0.351 | ||
| <6 cm | 12 | 4.13 (1.24–7.23) | |
| ≥6 cm | 33 | 4.66 (2.12–8.32) | |
| Tumor location | 0.212 | ||
| Colon | 21 | 4.14 (1.35–8.46) | |
| Rectum | 24 | 4.78 (2.00–7.98) | |
| Differentiation | 0.373 | ||
| Well | 18 | 4.43 (2.11–7.55) | |
| Moderate | 17 | 4.37 (2.45–7.91) | |
| Poor | 10 | 4.98 (3.08–8.01) | |
| Local invasion | 0.084 | ||
| T1–T2 | 19 | 4.03 (2.01–7.12) | |
| T3–T4 | 26 | 4.76 (2.45–8.33) | |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.378 | ||
| No | 24 | 4.26 (2.08–7.56) | |
| Yes | 21 | 4.63 (2.48–7.55) | |
| Distant metastasis | 0.060 | ||
| No | 42 | 4.29 (1.34–6.99) | |
| Yes | 3 | 5.04 (2.11–8.54) | |
| TNM stage | |||
| I–II | 24 | 3.98 (1.10–6.72) | 0.034 |
| III–IV | 21 | 5.32 (2.48–8.39) | |
Figure 2The diagnostic and prognostic value of miR-429 in CRC tissues. ROC curve was drawn to exhibit the diagnostic capacity of miR-429 (A) and CEA (B). (C) miR-429 expression was negatively correlated with CEA in primary CRC tissues. (D) Patients with high expression of miR-429 were associated with shorter overall survival compared with patients with low expression.
Figure 3MiR-429 expression was associated with chemo-response to 5-FU-based treatment in CRC patients. (A) MiR-429 levels were significantly higher in non-responding group than in responding group among CRC patients receiving 5-FU-based chemotherapy. (B) No significant difference was found of miR-429 level among different 5-FU-based chemotherapy methods. (C) ROC curve was drawn to explore the capacity of miR-429 in distinguishing responding and non-responding patients receiving 5-FU-based treatment.
Figure 4MiR-429 is a prognostic factor in patients receiving 5-FU-based treatment. (A) The proportion of CRC patients not responding to 5-FU-based chemotherapy was significantly higher in the high miR-429 expressing group than in the low group. (B) Patients with high miR-429 expression were associated with short overall survival among CRC patients receiving 5-FU-based therapy.
Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model analysis for overall survival in CRC patients receiving 5-FU based treatment.
| Factors | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| RR | 95% CI | ||
| Gender | 0.999 | 0.498–2.003 | 0.998 |
| Age | 1.932 | 0.879–4.246 | 0.091 |
| Tumor location | 0.792 | 0.402–1.827 | 0.435 |
| Tumor size | 0.918 | 0.423–1.998 | 0.831 |
| Differentiation | 1.013 | 0.514–1.887 | 0.921 |
| Local invasion | 1.275 | 0.614–2.731 | 0.571 |
| Lymph node metastasis | 1.804 | 1.023–2.937 | 0.036 |
| Distant metastasis | 2.047 | 1.018–3.918 | 0.021 |
| TNM stage | 3.772 | 1.309–9.385 | 0.011 |
| MiR-429 expression | 2.296 | 1.105–4.528 | 0.027 |