Literature DB >> 2765291

Is breast self-examination predicted by knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, or sociodemographic characteristics?

S W Fletcher1, T M Morgan, M S O'Malley, J A Earp, D Degnan.   

Abstract

The relationship of women's sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs to breast self-examination (BSE) practice is not clear. We therefore studied these variables among older women at risk for developing breast cancer to determine which might be associated with the sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of BSE practice. We interviewed 300 women 40 to 68 years of age and measured BSE sensitivity and specificity using manufactured silicone breast models containing lumps. Of 54 variables and 10 scales examined univariately, six were associated with BSE sensitivity, one was negatively associated with specificity, and 10 were associated with frequency. No variable was associated with more than one component of BSE practice, and BSE frequency was not associated with BSE sensitivity or specificity. Using multivariate analysis, BSE sensitivity was best explained by type of employment, health interest, and perceived vulnerability to breast cancer, which accounted for approximately 16% of the variance. BSE frequency was best explained by intention to perform BSE, knowing how to perform BSE, using the correct method of BSE, self-confidence in the ability to perform BSE monthly, and self-confidence in the ability to find small lumps. These variables accounted for 27% of the variance. Sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs poorly predicted how accurately women practiced BSE but somewhat better predicted how often women practiced BSE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2765291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  7 in total

1.  Psychological distress, health beliefs, and frequency of breast self-examination.

Authors:  J Erblich; D H Bovbjerg; H B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2000-06

2.  How do women compare with internal medicine residents in breast lump detection? A study with silicone models.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; M S O'Malley; C A Pilgrim; J J Gonzalez
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Breast self-examination and survival from breast cancer: a prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  A Auvinen; L Elovainio; M Hakama
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Health Belief Model variables as predictors of screening mammography utilization.

Authors:  R B Hyman; S Baker; R Ephraim; A Moadel; J Philip
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1994-08

5.  Negative opinions about cancer screening and contraceptive measures by female emergency department patients.

Authors:  Roland C Merchant; Erin M Gee; Beth C Bock; Bruce M Becker; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2008-11-15

6.  Factors determining compliance with screening mammography.

Authors:  M D Beaulieu; F Béland; D Roy; M Falardeau; G Hébert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Putting the Focus Back on the Patient: How Privacy Concerns Affect Personal Health Information Sharing Intentions.

Authors:  Joana Gaia; Mohamed Abdelhamid; G Lawrence Sanders
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 5.428

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.