Literature DB >> 27652288

Total body irradiation must be delivered at high dose for efficient engraftment and tolerance in a rhesus stem cell gene therapy model.

Naoya Uchida1, R Patrick Weitzel1, Anna Shvygin1, Luke P Skala1, Lydia Raines1, Aylin C Bonifacino2, Allen E Krouse2, Mark E Metzger2, Robert E Donahue2, John F Tisdale1.   

Abstract

Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) is desirable for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) gene therapy applications. However, low gene marking was previously observed in gene therapy trials, suggesting that RIC might be insufficient for (i) opening niches for efficient engraftment and/or (ii) inducing immunological tolerance for transgene-encoded proteins. Therefore, we evaluated both engraftment and tolerance for gene-modified cells using our rhesus HSC gene therapy model following RIC. We investigated a dose de-escalation of total body irradiation (TBI) from our standard dose of 10Gy (10, 8, 6, and 4Gy), in which rhesus CD34(+) cells were transduced with a VSVG-pseudotyped chimeric HIV-1 vector encoding enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) (or enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)). At ~6 months after transplantation, higher-dose TBI resulted in higher gene marking with logarithmic regression in peripheral blood cells. We then evaluated immunological tolerance for gene-modified cells, and found that lower-dose TBI allowed vigorous anti-GFP antibody production with logarithmic regression, while no significant anti-VSVG antibody formation was observed among all TBI groups. These data suggest that higher-dose TBI improves both engraftment and immunological tolerance for gene-modified cells. Additional immunosuppression might be required in RIC to induce tolerance for transgene products. Our findings should be valuable for developing conditioning regimens for HSC gene therapy applications.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27652288      PMCID: PMC5022796          DOI: 10.1038/mtm.2016.59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev        ISSN: 2329-0501            Impact factor:   6.698


Introduction

Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC)-targeted gene therapy is potentially curative for various inherited diseases, and several groups have recently reported therapeutic benefit in gene therapy trials.[1-6] Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens in the autologous setting are desirable for HSC-targeted gene therapy, as immunologic barriers encountered in the allogeneic HSC transplantation setting are not present and the perceived need for immunosuppression is not required. In addition, conventional myeloablative conditioning may not be well tolerated for many desired applications, including severe immunodeficiency due to chronic infections and sickle cell disease (SCD) due to end organ damage. However, in previous gene therapy trials, low gene marking was reported in peripheral blood cells,[1-6] raising the question that RIC might be insufficient for efficient engraftment of gene-modified HSCs expressing neoantigens. Conditioning regimens are designed to promote hematopoietic stem cell engraftment by the cells administered over those cells that reside in the marrow space. The conditioning therapy contains two major effects: (i) myelosuppression to open the niche space for HSC engraftment; and (ii) immunosuppression to prevent graft rejection.[7] Traditionally, high-intensity myeloablative conditioning regimens have been used for allogenic transplantation applications, which carry a high risk of treatment related morbidity, and to a lesser extent, mortality. As such, high-intensity conditioning is less suitable for patients with potential and/or existing organ damage, including elder patients and adult SCD patients. In addition, conventional myeloablative conditioning is important to reduce/eliminate residual leukemia or lymphoma cells in patients with hematological malignancies; however, this additional goal is not relevant to gene therapy for nonmalignant diseases.[8] Recently, RIC regimens were developed to improve transplant-related mortality, and results in adult SCD patients demonstrate acceptable safety parameters.[9,10] We previously established an HSC-targeted gene therapy model in rhesus macaques with high gene marking in peripheral blood cells long-term after transplantation following a myeloablative dose of 10Gy total body irradiation (TBI).[11,12] This large animal model allows us to evaluate efficiency for gene marking in hematopoietic repopulating cells, immunological reactions to gene-modified cells, and safety (insertional mutagenesis) in various gene therapy settings during extended follow-up.[13-15] Using our rhesus gene therapy model, in the current study, we investigated dose de-escalation of TBI as means to evaluate RIC transplantation, and evaluated both engraftment and tolerance for gene-modified cells.

Results

Increasing doses of TBI result in higher marking levels in vivo in a rhesus gene therapy model

To evaluate whether RIC is insufficient for (i) opening niches for efficient engraftment and (ii) inducing immunological tolerance for transgenes, we evaluated both gene marking levels and immunological response in 20 rhesus macaques who received a dose de-escalation of TBI (10, 8, 6, and 4Gy) in an HSC-targeted gene therapy model (Figure 1a). The 10Gy TBI was previously established in our rhesus macaque model and allows stable, high-level gene marking in vivo years after transplantation, while in the current study, decreasing doses of TBI (8-4Gy) were used as RIC transplantation.[11-13,15] The mobilized rhesus CD34+ cells were transduced with a vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein (VSVG)-pseudotyped chimeric HIV-1 vector encoding enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) (or YFP), which allows us to efficiently transduce rhesus hematopoietic cells as well as human hematopoietic cells.[11,12,16] The transduced CD34+ cells were transplanted into autologous animals following 10-4Gy of TBI conditioning. We evaluated gene marking levels in vivo in peripheral blood ~6 months after transplantation, by quantifying the fraction of GFP (or YFP)-positive cells (%GFP) by flow cytometry and average vector copy number per cell (VCN) by real-time polymerase chain reaction.
Figure 1

Increasing doses of total body irradiation (TBI) results in higher marking levels in vivo in a rhesus gene therapy model. (a) To evaluate whether reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) is sufficient for hematopoietic stem cell-targeted gene therapy, we performed dose de-escalation of TBI (10, 8, 6, and 4Gy) in a rhesus gene therapy model. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and stem cell factor (SCF)-mobilized rhesus CD34+ cells were transduced with an enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) (or enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (YFP))-expressing lentiviral vector at multiplicity of infection (MOI) 50, and the transduced CD34+ cells were infused into rhesus macaques following various doses of TBI conditioning. At ~6 months after transplantation, we evaluated gene marking levels in granulocytes and lymphocytes, which were analyzed by GFP (or YFP) positive rates (%GFP) and vector copy numbers (VCNs). (b) A small aliquot of transduced CD34+ cells were cultured in vitro to evaluate transduction efficiency. We observed efficient transduction (%GFP) for transduced rhesus CD34+ cells in vitro among all TBI groups. (c) Increasing doses of TBI resulted in higher %GFP with logarithmic regression in both granulocytes and lymphocytes. (d) Similar positive logarithmic correlation was observed between TBI doses and VCNs in both granulocytes and lymphocytes. These data suggest that higher doses of TBI improve engraftment of gene-modified hematopoietic repopulating cells.

To confirm whether rhesus CD34+ cells were sufficiently transduced with lentiviral vectors, we cultured a small aliquot of transduced CD34+ cells and evaluated in vitro %GFP 3–4 days after transduction. Efficient transduction (22–71%) was observed for rhesus CD34+ cells among all TBI groups, and there was no correlation between TBI doses and in vitro %GFP (R2 = 0.05, P = 0.31) (Figure 1b). After RIC (8-4Gy TBI) and transplantation of transduced CD34+ cells, reductions in blood cell counts progressed more slowly in white blood cells, granulocytes, and lymphocytes, as compared to 10Gy TBI (Figure 2a,b,c). Predictably, we also observed a relatively faster recovery of hemoglobin concentrations and platelet counts in the RIC animals (Figure 2d,e). GFP-positive cells were initially observed in peripheral blood cells among all animals. In the animals receiving a myeloablative dose of 10Gy TBI conditioning, intermediate %GFP (22–25%) and VCNs (3.0–3.6) were observed in peripheral blood cells ~6 months after transplantation (Figure 1c,d). Increasing doses of TBI resulted in higher %GFP with logarithmic regression in both granulocytes (R2 = 0.64, P < 0.01) and lymphocytes (R2 = 0.67, P < 0.01) (Figure 1c). A similar positive correlation was observed between TBI doses and VCNs in both granulocytes (R2 = 0.54, P < 0.01) and lymphocytes (R2 = 0.52, P < 0.01) (Figure 1d). These data demonstrate that higher doses of TBI improve engraftment of gene-modified hematopoietic repopulating cells.
Figure 2

The blood cell counts were more mildly and slowly reduced in the reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) animals. (a,b,c) The milder and slower reduction of blood counts was observed in white blood cells, granulocytes, and lymphocytes among the RIC animals (8-4Gy total body irradiation (TBI)), as compared to 10Gy TBI. (d and e) We observed relatively faster recovery of hemoglobin concentrations and platelet counts after RIC transplantation.

Lower doses of TBI allow anti-GFP antibody production in a rhesus gene therapy model

At lower doses of TBI, we initially observed very high %GFP (89–97%) confined to the granulocyte fraction of peripheral blood cells at early time points (1–3 months) after transplantation, as compared to the lymphocyte fraction (P < 0.05 in 6-4Gy at ~3 months post-transplant) (Figure 3), suggesting an immunological response against GFP and subsequent phagocytosis.[13] To evaluate immunological tolerance for gene-modified cells, we measured both anti-GFP and anti-VSVG antibody titers using serum samples obtained ~6 months after transplantation. The animals receiving myeloablative conditioning of 10Gy TBI did not produce either anti-GFP or anti-VSVG antibodies after transplantation (Figure 4a,b). However, RIC transplantation at lower-dose TBI allowed for high-titer anti-GFP antibody production with logarithmic regression (R2 = 0.84, P < 0.01) (Figure 4a). No such effect on anti-VSVG antibody production was observed among all TBI groups (R2 = 0.003, P = 0.87) (Figure 4b). The background levels in no antigen-coated controls were detectable in only the lowest dilution of serum (1e2) for the anti-GFP antibody and undetectable for the anti-VSVG antibody. These data demonstrate that higher-dose TBI is important to induce immunological tolerance for transgene products in gene-modified cells in our rhesus gene therapy model.
Figure 3

Very high %GFP was initially observed in granulocytes ~3 months after lower-dose total body irradiation (TBI) conditioning. In lower doses of TBI conditioning animals (6-4Gy), we initially observed very high %GFP (close to 100%) specific for the granulocyte fraction of peripheral blood cells at ~3 months after transplantation (not in the lymphocyte fraction), suggesting immunological responses to GFP and subsequent phagocytosis.

Figure 4

Lower doses of total body irradiation (TBI) induces anti-GFP antibody production. (a) To evaluate immunological tolerance for gene-modified cells, we measured both anti-GFP and anti-vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein (VSVG) antibody titers in the transplanted rhesus macaques. Lower-dose TBI allowed anti-GFP antibody production with logarithmic regression. (b) No such effect on anti-VSVG antibody was observed among all TBI groups. The background levels in no antigen-coated controls were 1e2 for the anti-GFP antibody and undetectable for the anti-VSVG antibody. These data demonstrate that higher dose TBI is important to induce immunological tolerance for gene-modified cells in a rhesus transplantation model.

Discussion

In this study, we investigated de-escalating doses of TBI conditioning in our rhesus gene therapy model with lentiviral transduction, and demonstrated that high-dose TBI (10Gy) is important for both more efficient engraftment of gene-modified cells and induction of immunological tolerance for the transgene product (GFP). Previously, we demonstrated that immunologic tolerance can be induced at 10Gy TBI[17] and that at lower doses of TBI, residual CD4+ cells remain in immune tissues.[15] Utilizing RIC doses of TBI (8-4Gy), lower gene marking levels and high anti-GFP antibody production were observed with regression in the transplanted rhesus macaques. In developing conditioning therapies for HSC transplantation, myelosuppression is thought to be important to open stem cell niches in the bone marrow.[7] According to our current understanding, HSCs (and primitive progenitor cells) can attach to the stem cell niche, and through this attachment, HSCs maintain their properties of self-renewal and multipotency.[18] Once HSCs are released from the niche, HSCs start differentiation and progressively lose these features. Following RIC transplantation for gene therapy application, the gene-modified HSCs must therefore compete with remaining host HSCs (native, unmodified HSCs, which presumably retain their attachment to the HSC niche) in order to gain access to open niche for engraftment, much like musical chairs. In allogeneic HSC transplantation, the donor lymphocytes contained within or deriving from the graft can remove the remaining recipient HSCs from their niche through immunological mechanisms permitting donor HSC engraftment, which can be enhanced further by donor lymphocyte infusions.[7] This could in part explain the much higher level of myeloid engraftment (mean donor chimerism at 3.6 years of 86%) seen in our recipients of allogeneic HSC transplantation after low-dose TBI at 3Gy in conjunction with alemtuzumab and sirolimus in adults with SCD.[9] However, this mechanism for enhanced engraftment does not occur in the gene therapy setting, and both gene-modified HSCs and remaining unmodified host HSCs can remain stably in the niches, since autologous HSCs are used for gene modification and the gene-modified graft cells should immunologically recognize the remaining host HSCs as self. Additionally, whether lower-dose TBI, such as that used in our allogeneic clinical trials for SCD, would be sufficient for obtaining high-level engraftment if the immunologic barrier were overcome has not been answered in the current study. We observed consistently in our rhesus gene therapy model that higher doses of TBI resulted in more efficient engraftment of gene-modified cells. Therefore, sufficient myelosuppression to open HSC niches appears paradoxically more important for efficient engraftment in autologous gene-modified HSC transplantation, as compared to allogeneic HSC transplantation. In allogeneic HSC transplantation, immunosuppression is crucial to prevent immunological rejection, and additional immunosuppressive therapies are generally used to also reduce the risk of graft versus host disease.[7,8] In the gene therapy setting, immunosuppression has long been deemed unnecessary, since autologous HSCs are used for gene modification (lentiviral transduction). This certainly held true for the immunodeficiencies which were initially targeted for gene therapy applications.[6] However, we hypothesized that therapeutic transgene products and/or lentiviral components could induce immunological rejection from remaining host lymphocytes to gene-modified graft derived cells. In our rhesus gene therapy model, 10Gy TBI resulted in efficient engraftment with no antibody production to either GFP or the VSVG envelope, while lower doses of TBI (8-4Gy) indeed permitted high-titer anti-GFP antibody production at 6 and 4Gy, suggesting immunological rejection. At 8Gy TBI, long-term engraftment was observed. These data suggest that additional immunosuppression may be helpful to induce immunological tolerance for transgene products (GFP) to allow RIC in gene therapy applications targeting HSCs. On the other hand, gene therapy trials utilizing vectors that encode a protein to which the patient is already tolerant may not require such additional immunosuppression as we observed no immunologic reaction to viral vector components. The availability of an intravenous formulation of the long-utilized alkylating agent, busulfan, has made this drug an attractive agent for a RIC regimen for gene therapy.[1,2,5] In recent gene therapy trials for β-thalassemia and SCD,[3] a myeloablative dose of busulfan conditioning is used, and currently these trials are ongoing at several institutions. While TBI conditioning regimens are effective for both myelosuppression and immunosuppression, busulfan conditioning is predominantly myelosuppressive, with a relative sparing of the immune system. Theoretically, a myeloablative dose of busulfan conditioning should be sufficient to open niches, resulting in efficient engraftment of gene-modified cells, but this leaves the concern that additional immunosuppression should be added to the conditioning to induce immunological tolerance against a therapeutic β-globin transgene. On the other hand, SCD patients encode similar proteins, including sickle globin and δ-globin, which may confer immunologic tolerance for a therapeutic β-globin protein without additional immunosuppression. We have previously demonstrated that busulfan produces dose-dependent engraftment in the murine setting with a prolonged window for HSC infusion.[19] Furthermore, busulfan pharmacokinetics is predictable in the rhesus.[20,21] We have now begun further experiments to investigate whether additional immunosuppression will permit immunological tolerance for transgene products including highly immunogenic proteins such as GFP or proteins to which the animals are presumably tolerant such as β-globin or γ-globin following busulfan conditioning in our rhesus gene therapy model. After lower doses of TBI conditioning (6-4Gy), we observed very high %GFP (92.8 ± 9.4%) in the granulocyte fraction at ~3 months after transplantation. However, these GFP-positive cells had low VCNs (0.10 ± 0.14) and VCNs declined to undetectable levels (<1%) at ~6 months. These data suggest that the GFP is not vector-encoded in these cells, but that the GFP protein is phagocytized by these cells in the granulocyte fraction ~3 months after transplantation. We previously observed strong T-lymphocyte reactions to GFP-positive cells in vitro, in rhesus RIC transplantation,[13] suggesting that both humoral and cellular immune responses are involved in the GFP reaction. In summary, higher doses of TBI increased gene-marking levels in transplanted rhesus macaques, while lower doses of TBI permitted anti-GFP antibody production leading to graft rejection. Additional immunosuppressive therapy might be required in RIC to induce immunological tolerance for transgene products. Our findings should be valuable to consider conditioning regimens for clinical gene therapy.

Materials and Methods

Rhesus HSC-targeted gene therapy model with TBI dose de-escalation

We previously developed a chimeric HIV-1-based lentiviral vector (χHIV vector) system, in which the HIV-1 genomes were packaged into the simian immunodeficiency virus capsid to efficiently transduce rhesus hematopoietic cells as well as human cells.[11,12,16] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) and stem cell factor (Amgen)-mobilized rhesus CD34+ cells were transduced with VSVG-pseudotyped χHIV vectors encoding GFP (or YFP) at multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 50, and the transduced cells were transplanted into rhesus macaques following a dose de-escalation of TBI (10, 8, 6, and 4Gy).[11-13,15] The TBI conditioning was performed over two equal doses (2x5Gy, 2x4Gy, and 2x3Gy) except for 4Gy TBI (1x4Gy). The 10Gy TBI was known as a myeloablative dose, while the TBI doses decreased as RIC regimens (8-4Gy). At ~6 months after transplantation, we evaluated both %GFP in peripheral blood cells by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ), and the VCNs by real-time polymerase chain reaction, as previously described.[11,22] For the statistical analysis, animals transplanted in competitive repopulation assays were scored by doubling the %GFP and VCNs derived from the half of CD34+ cells transduced with the χHIV vector.

Evaluation of anti-GFP or anti-VSVG antibody production by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

We performed ELISA to quantitate anti-GFP or anti-VSVG antibodies in the rhesus serum ~6 months (2–10 months) after transplantation, as previously described.[13] Briefly, we coated a 96-well plate with a recombinant GFP protein (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) or a VSVG envelope protein produced in transfected 293T cells, and added serial dilutions of monkey serum into these wells. After incubation and washing, anti-monkey IgG secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) was added to detect GFP- or VSVG-bound immunoglobulin, and tetramethylbenzidine reaction signals were detected by absorbance at 450 nm.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the JMP 11 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The averages in various conditions were evaluated by Dunnett’s test (one-way analysis of variance for a control). Two averages were evaluated by the student’s t-test. Correlations were evaluated by R square in logarithmic regression and p values in correlation coefficient. A P value of <0.01 or <0.05 was deemed significant. Standard deviations were shown as error bars in all figures.
  22 in total

1.  Discordance in lymphoid tissue recovery following stem cell transplantation in rhesus macaques: an in vivo imaging study.

Authors:  Robert E Donahue; Sharat Srinivasula; Naoya Uchida; Insook Kim; Alexis St Claire; Gorka Duralde; Paula DeGrange; Marisa St Claire; Richard C Reba; Aylin C Bonifacino; Allen E Krouse; Mark E Metzger; Chang H Paik; H Clifford Lane; John F Tisdale; Michele Di Mascio
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  Stem cells and their niches.

Authors:  Kateri A Moore; Ihor R Lemischka
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Transfusion independence and HMGA2 activation after gene therapy of human β-thalassaemia.

Authors:  Marina Cavazzana-Calvo; Emmanuel Payen; Olivier Negre; Gary Wang; Kathleen Hehir; Floriane Fusil; Julian Down; Maria Denaro; Troy Brady; Karen Westerman; Resy Cavallesco; Beatrix Gillet-Legrand; Laure Caccavelli; Riccardo Sgarra; Leila Maouche-Chrétien; Françoise Bernaudin; Robert Girot; Ronald Dorazio; Geert-Jan Mulder; Axel Polack; Arthur Bank; Jean Soulier; Jérôme Larghero; Nabil Kabbara; Bruno Dalle; Bernard Gourmel; Gérard Socie; Stany Chrétien; Nathalie Cartier; Patrick Aubourg; Alain Fischer; Kenneth Cornetta; Frédéric Galacteros; Yves Beuzard; Eliane Gluckman; Frederick Bushman; Salima Hacein-Bey-Abina; Philippe Leboulch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Accelerated lymphocyte reconstitution and long-term recovery after transplantation of lentiviral-transduced rhesus CD34+ cells mobilized by G-CSF and plerixafor.

Authors:  Naoya Uchida; Aylin Bonifacino; Allen E Krouse; Mark E Metzger; Gyorgy Csako; Agnes Lee-Stroka; Ross M Fasano; Susan F Leitman; Joseph J Mattapallil; Matthew M Hsieh; John F Tisdale; Robert E Donahue
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Gene therapy for immunodeficiency due to adenosine deaminase deficiency.

Authors:  Alessandro Aiuti; Federica Cattaneo; Stefania Galimberti; Ulrike Benninghoff; Barbara Cassani; Luciano Callegaro; Samantha Scaramuzza; Grazia Andolfi; Massimiliano Mirolo; Immacolata Brigida; Antonella Tabucchi; Filippo Carlucci; Martha Eibl; Memet Aker; Shimon Slavin; Hamoud Al-Mousa; Abdulaziz Al Ghonaium; Alina Ferster; Andrea Duppenthaler; Luigi Notarangelo; Uwe Wintergerst; Rebecca H Buckley; Marco Bregni; Sarah Marktel; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Paolo Rossi; Fabio Ciceri; Roberto Miniero; Claudio Bordignon; Maria-Grazia Roncarolo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Correction of X-linked chronic granulomatous disease by gene therapy, augmented by insertional activation of MDS1-EVI1, PRDM16 or SETBP1.

Authors:  Marion G Ott; Manfred Schmidt; Kerstin Schwarzwaelder; Stefan Stein; Ulrich Siler; Ulrike Koehl; Hanno Glimm; Klaus Kühlcke; Andrea Schilz; Hana Kunkel; Sonja Naundorf; Andrea Brinkmann; Annette Deichmann; Marlene Fischer; Claudia Ball; Ingo Pilz; Cynthia Dunbar; Yang Du; Nancy A Jenkins; Neal G Copeland; Ursula Lüthi; Moustapha Hassan; Adrian J Thrasher; Dieter Hoelzer; Christof von Kalle; Reinhard Seger; Manuel Grez
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2006-04-02       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Nonmyeloablative HLA-matched sibling allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe sickle cell phenotype.

Authors:  Matthew M Hsieh; Courtney D Fitzhugh; R Patrick Weitzel; Mary E Link; Wynona A Coles; Xiongce Zhao; Griffin P Rodgers; Jonathan D Powell; John F Tisdale
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Conditioning regimens for hematopoietic cell transplantation: one size does not fit all.

Authors:  Boglarka Gyurkocza; Brenda M Sandmaier
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Correction of ADA-SCID by stem cell gene therapy combined with nonmyeloablative conditioning.

Authors:  Alessandro Aiuti; Shimon Slavin; Memet Aker; Francesca Ficara; Sara Deola; Alessandra Mortellaro; Shoshana Morecki; Grazia Andolfi; Antonella Tabucchi; Filippo Carlucci; Enrico Marinello; Federica Cattaneo; Sergio Vai; Paolo Servida; Roberto Miniero; Maria Grazia Roncarolo; Claudio Bordignon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Integration-specific In Vitro Evaluation of Lentivirally Transduced Rhesus CD34(+) Cells Correlates With In Vivo Vector Copy Number.

Authors:  Naoya Uchida; Molly E Evans; Matthew M Hsieh; Aylin C Bonifacino; Allen E Krouse; Mark E Metzger; Stephanie E Sellers; Cynthia E Dunbar; Robert E Donahue; John F Tisdale
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 10.183

View more
  6 in total

1.  Busulfan Combined with Immunosuppression Allows Efficient Engraftment of Gene-Modified Cells in a Rhesus Macaque Model.

Authors:  Naoya Uchida; Tina Nassehi; Claire M Drysdale; Jackson Gamer; Morgan Yapundich; Aylin C Bonifacino; Allen E Krouse; Nathaniel Linde; Matthew M Hsieh; Robert E Donahue; Cynthia E Dunbar; Leslie S Kean; John F Tisdale
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 2.  Hematopoietic Stem Cell Gene-Addition/Editing Therapy in Sickle Cell Disease.

Authors:  Paula Germino-Watnick; Malikiya Hinds; Anh Le; Rebecca Chu; Xiong Liu; Naoya Uchida
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 3.  Immunoresponse to Gene-Modified Hematopoietic Stem Cells.

Authors:  Claire M Drysdale; John F Tisdale; Naoya Uchida
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 6.698

4.  Systematic improvements in lentiviral transduction of primary human natural killer cells undergoing ex vivo expansion.

Authors:  David S J Allan; Mala Chakraborty; Giacomo C Waller; Michael J Hochman; Akkapon Poolcharoen; Robert N Reger; Richard W Childs
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 6.698

5.  Preclinical evaluation for engraftment of CD34+ cells gene-edited at the sickle cell disease locus in xenograft mouse and non-human primate models.

Authors:  Naoya Uchida; Linhong Li; Tina Nassehi; Claire M Drysdale; Morgan Yapundich; Jackson Gamer; Juan J Haro-Mora; Selami Demirci; Alexis Leonard; Aylin C Bonifacino; Allen E Krouse; N Seth Linde; Cornell Allen; Madhusudan V Peshwa; Suk See De Ravin; Robert E Donahue; Harry L Malech; John F Tisdale
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2021-04-20

Review 6.  Immunological barriers to haematopoietic stem cell gene therapy.

Authors:  Carsten T Charlesworth; Ian Hsu; Adam C Wilkinson; Hiromitsu Nakauchi
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 108.555

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.