OBJECTIVE: Gene transfer to hematopoietic stem cells has recently been demonstrated to benefit a small number of patients in whom a selective advantage is conferred upon genetically modified cells; however, in disorders where no such selective advantage is conferred, conditioning appears necessary to allow adequate engraftment. To decrease the toxicity profile, we sought to develop nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens and in this work, explored the use of intravenous busulfan in a large animal model. METHODS: Busulfan pharmacokinetics and toxicity were monitored in young rhesus macaques at two dosing levels (4 and 6 mg/kg). These doses were then employed to condition two animals at each dose level prior to autologous transplantation of genetically modified cells using our standard methods. RESULTS: Busulfan pharmacokinetic (PK) data showed the area under the curve (AUC), drug half-life, and drug clearance were consistent within each dose group and similar to those reported in children. Single doses of busulfan were well tolerated and produced dose-dependent myelosuppression, most notably in the neutrophil and platelet counts. Although marking levels reached over 1% early in one animal, the long-term marking was low but detectable at 0.01 to 0.001%. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that low-dose intravenous bolus infusion of busulfan is well tolerated, has dose-dependent effects on peripheral blood counts, and allows long-term engraftment of genetically modified cells, but at levels too low for most clinical disorders.
OBJECTIVE: Gene transfer to hematopoietic stem cells has recently been demonstrated to benefit a small number of patients in whom a selective advantage is conferred upon genetically modified cells; however, in disorders where no such selective advantage is conferred, conditioning appears necessary to allow adequate engraftment. To decrease the toxicity profile, we sought to develop nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens and in this work, explored the use of intravenous busulfan in a large animal model. METHODS:Busulfan pharmacokinetics and toxicity were monitored in young rhesus macaques at two dosing levels (4 and 6 mg/kg). These doses were then employed to condition two animals at each dose level prior to autologous transplantation of genetically modified cells using our standard methods. RESULTS:Busulfan pharmacokinetic (PK) data showed the area under the curve (AUC), drug half-life, and drug clearance were consistent within each dose group and similar to those reported in children. Single doses of busulfan were well tolerated and produced dose-dependent myelosuppression, most notably in the neutrophil and platelet counts. Although marking levels reached over 1% early in one animal, the long-term marking was low but detectable at 0.01 to 0.001%. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that low-dose intravenous bolus infusion of busulfan is well tolerated, has dose-dependent effects on peripheral blood counts, and allows long-term engraftment of genetically modified cells, but at levels too low for most clinical disorders.
Authors: H L Malech; P B Maples; N Whiting-Theobald; G F Linton; S Sekhsaria; S J Vowells; F Li; J A Miller; E DeCarlo; S M Holland; S F Leitman; C S Carter; R E Butz; E J Read; T A Fleisher; R D Schneiderman; D E Van Epps; S K Spratt; C A Maack; J A Rokovich; L K Cohen; J I Gallin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1997-10-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ashwin Kashyap; John Wingard; Pablo Cagnoni; Jones Roy; Stephan Tarantolo; Wendy Hu; Karl Blume; Joyce Niland; Joycelynne M Palmer; William Vaughan; Hugo Fernandez; Richard Champlin; Stephen Forman; Borje S Andersson Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2002 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: J Zwaveling; R G M Bredius; S C L M Cremers; L M Ball; A C Lankester; I M Teepe-Twiss; R M Egeler; J den Hartigh; J M Vossen Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Peiman Hematti; Sascha Tuchman; Andre Larochelle; Mark E Metzger; Robert E Donahue; John F Tisdale Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.277
Authors: Manuel Grez; Janine Reichenbach; Joachim Schwäble; Reinhard Seger; Mary C Dinauer; Adrian J Thrasher Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Els Verhoeyen; Francis Relouzat; Marie Cambot; Caroline Costa; Didier Nègre; Faézeh Legrand; Christophe Joubert; Roger Le Grand; François-Loïc Cosset; Philippe Leboulch; Anne Dubart-Kupperschmitt; Stephane Prost Journal: Hum Gene Ther Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 5.695
Authors: Elizabeth M Kang; Uimook Choi; Narda Theobald; Gilda Linton; Debra A Long Priel; Doug Kuhns; Harry L Malech Journal: Blood Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Brian P Hermann; Meena Sukhwani; Felicity Winkler; Julia N Pascarella; Karen A Peters; Yi Sheng; Hanna Valli; Mario Rodriguez; Mohamed Ezzelarab; Gina Dargo; Kim Peterson; Keith Masterson; Cathy Ramsey; Thea Ward; Maura Lienesch; Angie Volk; David K Cooper; Angus W Thomson; Joseph E Kiss; Maria Cecilia T Penedo; Gerald P Schatten; Shoukhrat Mitalipov; Kyle E Orwig Journal: Cell Stem Cell Date: 2012-11-02 Impact factor: 24.633
Authors: Matthew M Hsieh; Saskia Langemeijer; Aisha Wynter; Oswald A Phang; Elizabeth M Kang; John F Tisdale Journal: Exp Hematol Date: 2007-07-09 Impact factor: 3.084