Literature DB >> 27651857

The complete genome sequences of sulfur-oxidizing Gammaproteobacteria Sulfurifustis variabilis skN76(T) and Sulfuricaulis limicola HA5(T).

Kazuhiro Umezawa1, Tomohiro Watanabe1, Aya Miura1, Hisaya Kojima1, Manabu Fukui1.   

Abstract

Sulfurifustis variabilis and Sulfuricaulis limicola are autotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria belonging to the family Acidiferrobacteraceae in the order Acidiferrobacterales. The type strains of these species, strain skN76(T) and strain HA5(T), were isolated from lakes in Japan. Here we describe the complete genome sequences of Sulfurifustis variabilis skN76(T) and Sulfuricaulis limicola HA5(T). The genome of Sulfurifustis variabilis skN76(T) consists of one circular chromosome with size of 4.0 Mbp including 3864 protein-coding sequences. The genome of Sulfuricaulis limicola HA5(T) is 2.9 Mbp chromosome with 2763 protein-coding sequences. In both genomes, 46 transfer RNA-coding genes and one ribosomal RNA operon were identified. In the genomes, redundancies of the genes involved in sulfur oxidation and inorganic carbon fixation pathways were observed. This is the first report to show the complete genome sequences of bacteria belonging to the order Acidiferrobacterales in the class Gammaproteobacteria.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acidiferrobacteraceae; Acidiferrobacterales; Bacteria; Gram-negative; Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria

Year:  2016        PMID: 27651857      PMCID: PMC5024460          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-016-0196-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

skN76T and HA5T are gammaproteobacterial sulfur-oxidizing bacteria isolated from sediments of Lake Mizugaki and Lake Harutori, respectively [1, 2]. They both belong to the family in the order . In this order, only three species have been isolated in pure culture. They are all chemolithoautotrophs and can grow by oxidation of inorganic sulfur compounds. and are neutrophilic, whereas the other species, , is acidophilic [3]. Taxonomy of has been revised several times, and the family and order were recently established to accommodate the species [1, 3–5]. The members of the family have been frequently detected in various environments as gene sequences [2, 3, 6]. Here we show the complete genome sequences of skN76T and HA5T as the first genomes of the order .

Organism information

Classification and features

The cells of skN76T are rod-shaped or filamentous form with varying length, and 0.3–0.5 μm in width (Fig. 1a, Table 1). The cells of HA5T are rod-shaped, 1.2–6.0 μm in length and 0.3–0.5 μm in width (Fig. 1b, Table 1). They are both Gram-stain-negative. and belong to the family within the class (Fig. 2). They both utilized thiosulfate, tetrathionate and elemental sulfur as electron donors for chemolithoautotrophic growth under aerobic conditions [1, 2].
Fig. 1

Phase-contrast micrographs of Sulfurifustis variabilis skN76T (a) and Sulfuricaulis limicola HA5T (b), grown with thiosulfate at 45 and 28 °C, respectively. Bars, 5 μm

Table 1

Classification and general features of Sulfurifustis variabilis skN76T and Sulfuricaulis limicola HA5T according to MIGS recommendations

MIGS IDProperty Sulfurifustis variabilis skN76T Sulfuricaulis limicola HA5T
TermEvidence code a TermEvidence code a
ClassificationDomain Bacteria TAS [23]Domain Bacteria TAS [23]
Phylum Proteobacteria TAS [24]Phylum Proteobacteria TAS [24]
Class Gammaproteobacteria TAS [25]Class Gammaproteobacteria TAS [25]
Order Acidiferrobacterales TAS [1]Order Acidiferrobacterales TAS [1]
Family Acidiferrobacteraceae TAS [1]Family Acidiferrobacteraceae TAS [1]
Genus Sulfurifustis TAS [1]Genus Sulfuricaulis TAS [2]
Species Sulfurifustis variabilis TAS [1]Species Sulfuricaulis limicola TAS [2]
Type strain skN76Type strain HA5
Gram stainnegativeTAS [1]negativeTAS [2]
Cell shaperod or filamentsTAS [1]rodTAS [2]
MotilitymotileTAS [1]not reported
Sporulationnot reportednot reported
Temperature range28–46 °CTAS [1]8–37 °CTAS [2]
Optimum temperature42–45 °CTAS [1]28–32 °CTAS [2]
pH range; Optimum6.3–8.9; 6.8–8.2TAS [1]6.1–9.2; unknownTAS [2]
Carbon sourcebicarbonateTAS [1]bicarbonateTAS [2]
MIGS-6HabitatSediment of a lakeTAS [1]Sediment of a lakeTAS [2]
MIGS-6.3Salinity<2.6 % NaCl (w/v)TAS [1]<1.2 % NaCl (w/v)TAS [2]
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementaerobicTAS [1]aerobicTAS [2]
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipfree-livingTAS [1]free-livingTAS [2]
MIGS-14Pathogenicitynon-pathogenNASnon-pathogenNAS
MIGS-4Geographic locationLake Mizugaki, JapanTAS [1]Lake Harutori, JapanTAS [2]
MIGS-5Sample collectionNovember 30, 2010NASApril 26, 2012NAS
MIGS-4.1Latitude35°51.5′ NTAS [26]42°58.4′ NNAS
MIGS-4.2Longitude138°30.0′ ETAS [26]144°23.9′ ENAS
MIGS-4.4Altitudenot reportednot reported

a Evidence codes–IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree showing the relationships of Sulfurifustis variabilis skN76T and Sulfuricaulis limicola HA5T with other members of the class Gammaproteobacteria based on 16S rRNA gene sequences aligned by using CLUSTAL W. Desulfatitalea tepidiphila S28bFT was used as an outgroup. This tree was reconstructed using 1412 sites with the neighbor-joining method by using MEGA6 [27]. Percentage values of 1000 bootstrap resamplings are shown at nodes; values below 50 % were not shown

Phase-contrast micrographs of Sulfurifustis variabilis skN76T (a) and Sulfuricaulis limicola HA5T (b), grown with thiosulfate at 45 and 28 °C, respectively. Bars, 5 μm Classification and general features of Sulfurifustis variabilis skN76T and Sulfuricaulis limicola HA5T according to MIGS recommendations a Evidence codes–IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project Phylogenetic tree showing the relationships of Sulfurifustis variabilis skN76T and Sulfuricaulis limicola HA5T with other members of the class Gammaproteobacteria based on 16S rRNA gene sequences aligned by using CLUSTAL W. Desulfatitalea tepidiphila S28bFT was used as an outgroup. This tree was reconstructed using 1412 sites with the neighbor-joining method by using MEGA6 [27]. Percentage values of 1000 bootstrap resamplings are shown at nodes; values below 50 % were not shown

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

variabillis skN76T and HA5T were selected for sequencing as representatives of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria belonging to the order , to reveal characteristics of their genomes. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Project information

MIGS IDProperty Sulfurifustis variabilis skN76T Sulfuricaulis limicola HA5T
TermTerm
MIGS 31Finishing qualityCompletedCompleted
MIGS-28Libraries used15–20 kb SMRTbellTM library10–20 kb SMRTbellTM library
MIGS 29Sequencing platformsPacBio RS IIPacBio RS II
MIGS 31.2Fold coverage210 ×142 ×
MIGS 30AssemblersRS_HGAP Assembly.2RS_HGAP Assembly.3
MIGS 32Gene calling methodMicrobial Genome Annotation PipelineMicrobial Genome Annotation Pipeline
Locus TagSVASCL
Genbank IDAP014936AP014879
GenBank Date of ReleaseJuly 29, 2016July 29, 2016
BIOPROJECTPRJDB4108PRJDB3927
MIGS 13Source Material IdentifierDSM 100313DSM 100373
Project relevanceEnvironmentalEnvironmental
Project information

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

skN76T and HA5T were grown with 20 mM thiosulfate as an energy source in a bicarbonate-buffered medium previously described [1], at 45 and 28 °C, respectively. Genomic DNA samples were prepared by using Wizard® genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) from approximately 0.2 ml (skN76) or 0.1 ml (HA5) of cell pellets. Amounts of the obtained DNA assessed by spectrophotometry were ca. 270 μg (skN76) and 90 μg (HA5) respectively, and the UV absorption ratio of 260/280 nm was greater than 1.8 in both samples.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genomic DNA was sheared into approximately 20 kb using g-TUBE (Covaris, Inc., Woburn, MA, USA). The SMRTbellTM templates were prepared from the fragments using SMRTbellTM Template Prep Kit 1.0 (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA). The size-selected libraries for sequencing were prepared by using BluePippin (Sage Science, Baverly, MA, USA). The libraries were sequenced on a PacBio RS II instrument (Pacific Biosciences) with P6-C4 chemistry (for variabillis skN76T) or P5-C3 chemistry (for HA5T). De novo assembly was performed by using RS_HGAP Assembly.3 (for variabillis skN76T) or RS_HGAP Assembly.2 (for HA5T), implemented within the SMRT Analysis v2.3 (Pacific Biosciences) software environment. By assembling 79,017 subreads (837,333,548 bp) of variabillis skN76T, two contigs with the lengths of ca. 4.0 Mbp and ca. 5.4 kbp were obtained. The shorter one was identical to a partial sequence of the larger one, and a circular chromosome was manually constructed from the larger contig by finding self-overlapping regions using the in silico Molecular Cloning (R) Genomic Edition (In Silico Biology, Inc., Yokohama, Japan) application. As for HA5T, a single contig (ca. 2.9 Mbp) was obtained by assembling 61,565 subreads (409,124,339 bp), and circular chromosome was manually constructed in the same manner.

Genome annotation

The genomes were annotated automatically using the Microbial Genome Annotation Pipeline [7]. Further manual annotation of the predicted protein-coding sequences was performed on the basis of BLASTP searches against the NCBI nonredundant database. CDSs were annotated as hypothetical protein-coding genes when they met any of the following four criteria in the top hit of the BLASTP analysis: (1) E-value >1e-8, (2) length coverage <60 % against query sequence (3) sequence identity <30 % or (4) function of the hit was unidentified. The WebMGA server was used to assign the genes to Clusters of Ortholog Groups and Protein family domains [8-11]. The Phobius server was used to predict signal peptides and transmembrane helices [12]. Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat loci were detected using CRISPRfinder [13].

Genome properties

The basic statistics of the genomes are shown in Table 3. Both genomes contained 46 tRNA genes and one rRNA operon. The genome size of variabillis skN76T was approximately 1.4 times larger than that of HA5T. CRISPR loci were found only in the genome of variabillis skN76T (Table 3). The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome statistics of Sulfurifustis variabilis skN76T and Sulfuricaulis limicola HA5T

Attribute Sulfurifustis variabilis skN76T Sulfuricaulis limicola HA5T
Value% of TotalValue% of Total
Genome size (bp)3,958,814100.002,864,672100.00
DNA coding (bp)3,565,56790.062,567,49389.63
DNA G + C (bp)2,670,56667.461,759,55761.42
DNA scaffolds1100.001100.00
Total genes3913100.002812100.00
Protein coding genes386498.75276398.26
RNA genes491.25491.74
Pseudo genesunknownunknown
Genes in internal clustersunknownunknown
Genes with function prediction293075.83203673.69
Genes assigned to COGs292175.60216578.36
Genes with Pfam domains297076.86220879.91
Genes with signal peptides89323.1156220.34
Genes with transmembrane helices84521.8762222.51
CRISPR repeats60
Table 4

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories

Code Sulfurifustis variabilis skN76T Sulfuricaulis limicola HA5T Description
Value%ageValue%age
J1644.241595.75Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A50.1320.07RNA processing and modification
K1914.941304.71Transcription
L1543.991174.23Replication, recombination and repair
B10.0310.04Chromatin structure and dynamics
D360.93311.12Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning
V431.11291.05Defense mechanisms
T2837.322187.89Signal transduction mechanisms
M2656.862107.60Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N661.71642.32Cell motility
U1233.18983.55Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O1854.791425.14Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C2656.861926.95Energy production and conversion
G1483.831013.66Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E2015.201505.43Amino acid transport and metabolism
F631.63592.14Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1674.321294.67Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I902.33652.35Lipid transport and metabolism
P1894.891274.60Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q561.45351.27Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R39410.202478.94General function prediction only
S3468.952308.32Function unknown
-94324.4059821.64Not in COGs
Genome statistics of Sulfurifustis variabilis skN76T and Sulfuricaulis limicola HA5T Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories

Insights from the genome sequences

In both the genomes of variabillis skN76T and HA5T, genes involved in the sulfur oxidation pathway were identified. The genomes of both strains contain genes of the DSR system related to the oxidation of elemental sulfur to sulfite [14, 15]. They contain a dsr gene cluster of identical composition, dsrABEFHCMKLJOPNR (SVA_1954-1967, SCL_1274-1261). There are some dsr genes outside of the gene cluster, dsrAB (SVA_0258-0259, SCL_0256-0257), dsrS (SVA_2921, SCL_0781) and dsrC (SVA_0281, SVA_0284, SVA_0358, SVA_0917, SVA_0969, SVA_1205, SVA_1793, SVA_1949, SVA_2832, SVA_3655; SCL_0275, SCL_0524, SCL_0785, SCL_1279, SCL_1423, SCL_2646). As genes encoding proteins involved in oxidation of sulfite to sulfate in the cytoplasm, both genomes contain two copies of the aprAB genes encoding an adenosine-5’-phosphosulphate reductase (SVA_2607-2608, SVA_3565-3564; SCL_0600-0601, SCL_2474-2473), along with the sat gene encoding a sulfate adenylyltransferase (SVA_3563, SCL_2472) and the aprM gene (SVA_2609, SCL_0602). In addition, the genome of HA5T contains the hdrAACB genes encoding a Hdr (SCL_2523-2520), but that of valiabilis skN76T does not. The AprM and Hdr complex are thought to have similar function that interacts with the adenosine-5’-phosphosulphate reductase [16-18]. The genomes also contain the soeABC genes (SVA_2734, SVA_2736-2737; SCL_0523-0521), encoding a membrane-bound polysulfide reductase-like iron-sulfur molybdoprotein, which is suspected to be involved in sulfite oxidation in the cytoplasm [19]. Further, the genome of valiabilis skN76T contains the sorAB genes (SVA_1391-1390) related to the direct oxidation of sulfite to sulfate in the periplasm [20]. For thiosulfate oxidation, both genomes contain the soxXYZAB gene cluster (SVA_2999-3003, SCL_2229-2233). Although sulfide oxidation by these bacteria has not been demonstrated, genes related to sulfide oxidation were identified; the fccAB (soxEF) genes encoding a flavocytochrome c/sulfide dehydrogenase (SVA_0067-0066, SVA_3594-3595; SCL_0078-0077) and the sqr gene encoding a sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase (SVA_1781, SVA_2675, SVA3205). variabillis skN76T and HA5T are autotrophic bacteria. They both have two copies of the rbcL and rbcS genes, encoding large and small subunits of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (SVA_3460-3459, SVA_3471-3470; SCL_2417-2416, SCL_2425-2424), which is the key enzyme in the Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle to catalyze inorganic carbon fixation. The two copies of RuBisCO in each genome are phylogenetically distinct, and belong to lineages referred to as green-like form IA and red-like form IC (Fig. 3) [21]. In the form IC RuBisCO coded by rbcL gene (SVA_3460, SCL_2417), variabillis skN76T and HA5T have six-amino-acid inserts at the same position where a similar insert was reported from sp. 40KI [22]. There are two other RuBisCO sequences which have six-amino-acid inserts at the same position, and these sequences with inserts formed a monophyletic cluster in the tree of RuBisCO (Fig. 3). In general, RuBisCO of form IA and IC have different properties which are thought to be advantageous to fix inorganic carbon under different concentrations of carbon dioxide and/or oxygen [21]. Possession of the genes for these two distinct RuBisCO forms may be beneficial to cope with changing environmental conditions, or to thrive in various types of ecosystems.
Fig. 3

Neighbor-joining tree showing the phylogenetic positions of RuBisCO amino acid sequences coded in the genomes of Sulfurifustis variabilis skN76T and Sulfuricaulis limicola HA5T. The sequences aligned by using CLUSTAL W. This tree was reconstructed using 421 sites with MEGA6 [27]. Percentage values of 1000 bootstrap resamplings are shown at nodes; values below 50 % were not shown. The sequences shown in box have six-amino-acid inserts at the same position

Neighbor-joining tree showing the phylogenetic positions of RuBisCO amino acid sequences coded in the genomes of Sulfurifustis variabilis skN76T and Sulfuricaulis limicola HA5T. The sequences aligned by using CLUSTAL W. This tree was reconstructed using 421 sites with MEGA6 [27]. Percentage values of 1000 bootstrap resamplings are shown at nodes; values below 50 % were not shown. The sequences shown in box have six-amino-acid inserts at the same position

Conclusion

This is the first report on complete genome sequences of bacteria belonging to the order . The genome analysis of variabillis skN76T and HA5T revealed that they have similar sets of genes involved in sulfur oxidation pathways. In the both genomes, redundancies of the genes for sulfur oxidation and inorganic carbon fixation were observed, as represented by multiple copies of dsrAB, aprAB and rbcLS. Such redundancies may provide physiological flexibility to the chemolithotrophic sulfur oxidizers which are fully depending on these functions to obtain energy and carbon source for growth.
  23 in total

1.  Sulfuricaulis limicola gen. nov., sp. nov., a sulfur oxidizer isolated from a lake.

Authors:  Hisaya Kojima; Tomohiro Watanabe; Manabu Fukui
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.747

2.  MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Glen Stecher; Daniel Peterson; Alan Filipski; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Phylogeny and functional expression of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase from the autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacterium Nitrosospira sp. isolate 40KI.

Authors:  Janne B Utåker; Kjell Andersen; Agot Aakra; Birgitte Moen; Ingolf F Nes
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Novel genes of the dsr gene cluster and evidence for close interaction of Dsr proteins during sulfur oxidation in the phototrophic sulfur bacterium Allochromatium vinosum.

Authors:  Christiane Dahl; Sabine Engels; Andrea S Pott-Sperling; Andrea Schulte; Johannes Sander; Yvonne Lübbe; Oliver Deuster; Daniel C Brune
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Reclassification of some species of Thiobacillus to the newly designated genera Acidithiobacillus gen. nov., Halothiobacillus gen. nov. and Thermithiobacillus gen. nov.

Authors:  D P Kelly; A P Wood
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  The Pfam protein families database.

Authors:  Robert D Finn; Jaina Mistry; John Tate; Penny Coggill; Andreas Heger; Joanne E Pollington; O Luke Gavin; Prasad Gunasekaran; Goran Ceric; Kristoffer Forslund; Liisa Holm; Erik L L Sonnhammer; Sean R Eddy; Alex Bateman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Sulfurifustis variabilis gen. nov., sp. nov., a sulfur oxidizer isolated from a lake, and proposal of Acidiferrobacteraceae fam. nov. and Acidiferrobacterales ord. nov.

Authors:  Hisaya Kojima; Arisa Shinohara; Manabu Fukui
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Molecular analysis of the distribution and phylogeny of dissimilatory adenosine-5'-phosphosulfate reductase-encoding genes (aprBA) among sulfur-oxidizing prokaryotes.

Authors:  Birte Meyer; Jan Kuever
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 9.  Multiple Rubisco forms in proteobacteria: their functional significance in relation to CO2 acquisition by the CBB cycle.

Authors:  Murray Ronald Badger; Emily Jane Bek
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 6.992

10.  Ubiquitous Gammaproteobacteria dominate dark carbon fixation in coastal sediments.

Authors:  Stefan Dyksma; Kerstin Bischof; Bernhard M Fuchs; Katy Hoffmann; Dimitri Meier; Anke Meyerdierks; Petra Pjevac; David Probandt; Michael Richter; Ramunas Stepanauskas; Marc Mußmann
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 10.302

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The life sulfuric: microbial ecology of sulfur cycling in marine sediments.

Authors:  Kenneth Wasmund; Marc Mußmann; Alexander Loy
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.541

2.  Genomes of Neutrophilic Sulfur-Oxidizing Chemolithoautotrophs Representing 9 Proteobacterial Species From 8 Genera.

Authors:  Tomohiro Watanabe; Hisaya Kojima; Kazuhiro Umezawa; Chiaki Hori; Taichi E Takasuka; Yukako Kato; Manabu Fukui
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Arsenite Oxidation by a Newly Isolated Betaproteobacterium Possessing arx Genes and Diversity of the arx Gene Cluster in Bacterial Genomes.

Authors:  Melody Cabrera Ospino; Hisaya Kojima; Manabu Fukui
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Geomicrobiology of a seawater-influenced active sulfuric acid cave.

Authors:  Ilenia M D'Angeli; Daniele Ghezzi; Stefan Leuko; Andrea Firrincieli; Mario Parise; Adriano Fiorucci; Bartolomeo Vigna; Rosangela Addesso; Daniela Baldantoni; Cristina Carbone; Ana Zelia Miller; Valme Jurado; Cesareo Saiz-Jimenez; Jo De Waele; Martina Cappelletti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Integrative Assessments on Molecular Taxonomy of Acidiferrobacter thiooxydans ZJ and Its Environmental Adaptation Based on Mobile Genetic Elements.

Authors:  Liyuan Ma; Weiyi Yang; Shanshan Huang; Rui Liu; Huiying Li; Xinping Huang; Junming Xiong; Xueduan Liu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.